• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鲨鱼两性体型差异的起源与驱动因素。

The origins and drivers of sexual size dimorphism in sharks.

作者信息

Gayford Joel H, Sternes Phillip C

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London London UK.

Shark Measurements London UK.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 17;14(3):e11163. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11163. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.11163
PMID:38500855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10944705/
Abstract

While sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is abundant in nature, there is huge variation in both the intensity and direction of SSD. SSD results from a combination of sexual selection for large male size, fecundity selection for large female size and ecological selection for either. In most vertebrates, it is variation in the intensity of male-male competition that primarily underlies variation in SSD. In this study, we test four hypotheses regarding the adaptive value of SSD in sharks-considering the potential for each of fecundity, sexual, ecological selection and reproductive mode as the primary driver of variation in SSD between species. We also estimate past macroevolutionary shifts in SSD direction/intensity through shark phylogeny. We were unable to find evidence of significant SSD in early sharks and hypothesise that SSD is a derived state in this clade, that has evolved independently of SSD observed in other vertebrates. Moreover, there is no significant relationship between SSD and fecundity, testes mass or oceanic depth in sharks. However, there is evidence to support previous speculation that reproductive mode is an important determinant of interspecific variation in SSD in sharks. This is significant as in most vertebrates sexual selection is thought to be the primary driver of SSD trends, with evidence for the role of fecundity selection in other clades being inconsistent at best. While the phylogenetic distribution of SSD among sharks is superficially similar to that observed in other vertebrate clades, the relative importance of selective pressures underlying its evolution appears to differ.

摘要

虽然两性体型差异(SSD)在自然界中很常见,但SSD的强度和方向存在巨大差异。SSD是由对大型雄性体型的性选择、对大型雌性体型的繁殖力选择以及对两者的生态选择共同作用的结果。在大多数脊椎动物中,雄性间竞争强度的差异是SSD差异的主要基础。在本研究中,我们检验了关于鲨鱼中SSD适应性价值的四个假设——将繁殖力、性选择、生态选择和繁殖模式中的每一个作为物种间SSD差异的主要驱动因素的可能性。我们还通过鲨鱼系统发育来估计过去SSD方向/强度的宏观进化转变。我们在早期鲨鱼中未能找到显著SSD的证据,并推测SSD在这个类群中是一种衍生状态,其进化独立于在其他脊椎动物中观察到的SSD。此外,鲨鱼的SSD与繁殖力、睾丸质量或海洋深度之间没有显著关系。然而,有证据支持先前的推测,即繁殖模式是鲨鱼种间SSD差异的重要决定因素。这很重要,因为在大多数脊椎动物中,性选择被认为是SSD趋势的主要驱动因素,而在其他类群中繁殖力选择作用的证据充其量也不一致。虽然鲨鱼中SSD的系统发育分布表面上与在其他脊椎动物类群中观察到的相似,但其进化背后选择压力的相对重要性似乎有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10944705/058a88c71326/ECE3-14-e11163-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10944705/8cdd54595044/ECE3-14-e11163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10944705/058a88c71326/ECE3-14-e11163-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10944705/8cdd54595044/ECE3-14-e11163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730e/10944705/058a88c71326/ECE3-14-e11163-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The origins and drivers of sexual size dimorphism in sharks.鲨鱼两性体型差异的起源与驱动因素。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 17;14(3):e11163. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11163. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Selection for increased male size predicts variation in sexual size dimorphism among fish species.选择增大雄性体型可预测鱼类种间性二型性大小变异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 15;287(1918):20192640. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2640.
3
Sharks Violate Rensch's Rule for Sexual Size Dimorphism.鲨鱼违反了伦施性大小二态性法则。
Integr Org Biol. 2024 Jul 4;6(1):obae025. doi: 10.1093/iob/obae025. eCollection 2024.
4
A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards.蜥蜴两性异形适应性假说的比较试验
Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1653-69. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00371.x.
5
Revisiting niche divergence hypothesis in sexually dimorphic birds: Is diet overlap correlated with sexual size dimorphism?重新审视性二态鸟类的生态位特化假说:饮食重叠与性二型性大小有关吗?
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Apr;93(4):460-474. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14058. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
6
The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.在青蛙中,繁殖力的进化与雌性体型有关,但与雌性偏向的两性体型差异无关。
J Evol Biol. 2015 Oct;28(10):1793-803. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12695. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
7
Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).生态分歧和性选择驱动新世界响尾蛇(蛇目:蝰蛇科)的性二型性。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Apr;27(4):760-71. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12349. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
Influence of microhabitat, fecundity, and parental care on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Caribbean Eleutherodactylus frogs.微生境、繁殖力和亲代照顾对加勒比海 Eleutherodactylus 蛙类性二型性进化的影响。
Evolution. 2022 Dec;76(12):3041-3053. doi: 10.1111/evo.14642. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development.对雄性体型的性选择通过延长雄性发育过程推动了雄性偏向的两性体型差异的进化。
Evolution. 2016 Jun;70(6):1189-99. doi: 10.1111/evo.12944. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10
The macroevolutionary dynamics of mammalian sexual size dimorphism.哺乳动物性二型大小的宏观进化动态。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 29;290(2011):20231211. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1211. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual Size Dimorphism in Rays and Skates (Elasmobranchii: Batoidea).鳐和魟(板鳃亚纲:鲼形目)的两性体型差异
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 21;15(7):e71858. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71858. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The adaptability of facultative parthenogenesis and 'multiple embryos per eggcase' as alternative reproductive strategies in Chondrichthyes.在软骨鱼类中,兼性孤雌生殖和“每个卵鞘多个胚胎”作为替代生殖策略的适应性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 30;12(4):242030. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242030. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Sharks Violate Rensch's Rule for Sexual Size Dimorphism.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of reproductive modes in sharks and rays.鲨鱼和鳐鱼生殖方式的演化。
J Evol Biol. 2023 Nov;36(11):1630-1640. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14231. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Shark mandible evolution reveals patterns of trophic and habitat-mediated diversification.鲨鱼下颚的进化揭示了营养和栖息介导的多样化模式。
Commun Biol. 2023 May 8;6(1):496. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04882-3.
3
First evidence of multiple paternity in the blue shark (Prionace glauca).蓝鲨(Prionace glauca)存在多重父权的首个证据。
鲨鱼违反了伦施性大小二态性法则。
Integr Org Biol. 2024 Jul 4;6(1):obae025. doi: 10.1093/iob/obae025. eCollection 2024.
J Fish Biol. 2023 Feb;102(2):528-531. doi: 10.1111/jfb.15272. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
Alternating regimes of shallow and deep-sea diversification explain a species-richness paradox in marine fishes.浅海和深海交替的多样化阶段解释了海洋鱼类丰富物种的悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2123544119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123544119. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Factors affecting gestation periods in elasmobranch fishes.影响软骨鱼类妊娠期的因素。
Biol Open. 2022 Jun 15;11(6). doi: 10.1242/bio.059270. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
6
Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals.动物中的性选择和性体型二型性。
Biol Lett. 2021 Sep;17(9):20210251. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0251. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
The deep sea is a hot spot of fish body shape evolution.深海是鱼类体型演化的热点地区。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Sep;24(9):1788-1799. doi: 10.1111/ele.13785. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
Body forms in sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) and their functional, ecological, and evolutionary implications.鲨鱼的身体形态(软骨鱼纲:板鳃亚纲)及其功能、生态和进化意义。
Zoology (Jena). 2020 Jun;140:125799. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2020.125799. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
9
Selection for increased male size predicts variation in sexual size dimorphism among fish species.选择增大雄性体型可预测鱼类种间性二型性大小变异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 15;287(1918):20192640. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2640.
10
Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm morphology in sharks.鲨鱼的性选择与精子形态的进化
J Evol Biol. 2019 Oct;32(10):1027-1035. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13501. Epub 2019 Aug 19.