• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盖尔模型及其在预防性筛查中的应用:科尔贝利研究的比较

The Gail Model and Its Use in Preventive Screening: A Comparison of the Corbelli Study.

作者信息

Pruitt William R, Samuels Beryl, Cunningham Scott

机构信息

Preventive Medicine, Oceania University of Medicine, Apia, WSM.

Neurosciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):e56290. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56290. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.56290
PMID:38501027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10945157/
Abstract

Background This study aims to determine the usage of the Gail model in screening for breast cancer during physical examinations of women by sampling primary care physicians in two regions of Texas - Hidalgo County and Johnson County. A Gail score of 1.66% or higher indicates increased breast cancer risk. Three specialties are surveyed: internal medicine (IM), family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN). The null hypothesis for this study is that primary care physicians do not use the Gail model in screening for breast cancer during physical examinations of women. Methods A survey was distributed to 100 physicians with specialties in IM, FM, and GYN from May 2022 to July 2022. The survey assessed the physician's frequency of use of the Gail model and chemoprevention. Data were collected by distributing survey questionnaires to physicians in person. Descriptive statistics were used for response distributions. Fisher's exact probability test was used for comparisons across specialties. Results The response rate was 34% (34/100). Thirty-eight percent of the physicians surveyed reported using the Gail model in their practice (IM 46%, FM 23%, and GYN 31%). All 13 of the physicians using the Gail model were open to using chemoprevention. Conclusions Only 38% of the physicians surveyed responded that they use the Gail model in their practice. The study concluded that a minority of primary care physicians used the Gail model to decrease breast cancer risk. Further research would help to define better the Gail model and its use in preventing breast cancer in women. The Gail model appears to be beneficial to breast cancer risk reduction; however, risk reduction medication side effects need to be minimized.

摘要

背景 本研究旨在通过对得克萨斯州两个地区——伊达尔戈县和约翰逊县的初级保健医生进行抽样,确定盖尔模型在女性体检中筛查乳腺癌的使用情况。盖尔评分1.66%或更高表明乳腺癌风险增加。调查了三个专业领域:内科(IM)、家庭医学(FM)和妇科(GYN)。本研究的零假设是初级保健医生在女性体检中不使用盖尔模型进行乳腺癌筛查。方法 在2022年5月至2022年7月期间,向100名具有IM、FM和GYN专业的医生发放了调查问卷。该调查评估了医生使用盖尔模型和化学预防的频率。通过亲自向医生发放调查问卷来收集数据。描述性统计用于反应分布。费舍尔精确概率检验用于跨专业比较。结果 回复率为34%(34/100)。38%的受访医生报告在其执业中使用盖尔模型(IM为46%,FM为23%,GYN为31%)。所有13名使用盖尔模型的医生都愿意使用化学预防。结论 只有38%的受访医生回复说他们在执业中使用盖尔模型。该研究得出结论,少数初级保健医生使用盖尔模型来降低乳腺癌风险。进一步的研究将有助于更好地定义盖尔模型及其在预防女性乳腺癌中的应用。盖尔模型似乎对降低乳腺癌风险有益;然而,需要尽量减少降低风险药物的副作用。

相似文献

1
The Gail Model and Its Use in Preventive Screening: A Comparison of the Corbelli Study.盖尔模型及其在预防性筛查中的应用:科尔贝利研究的比较
Cureus. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):e56290. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56290. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Use of the Gail model and breast cancer preventive therapy among three primary care specialties.盖尔模型在三个初级保健专科中的应用及乳腺癌预防性治疗
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep;23(9):746-52. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4742. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
3
Utilization of a breast cancer risk assessment tool by internal medicine residents in a primary care clinic: impact of an educational program.内科住院医师在初级保健诊所中使用乳腺癌风险评估工具:教育计划的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5418-6.
4
The effectiveness of the Gail model in estimating risk for development of breast cancer in women under 40 years of age.盖尔模型在评估40岁以下女性患乳腺癌风险方面的有效性。
Breast J. 2001 Jan-Feb;7(1):34-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007001034.x.
5
Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.40000 名澳大利亚女性的 NCI 乳腺癌风险评估工具( Gail 模型)前瞻性验证。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1084-x.
6
Gail Model Underestimates Breast Cancer Risk in Thai Population.盖尔模型低估了泰国人群的乳腺癌风险。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):2385-2389. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.8.2385.
7
Assessing Breast Cancer Risk Estimates Based on the Gail Model and Its Predictors in Qatari Women.基于盖尔模型及其预测因素评估卡塔尔女性的乳腺癌风险估计
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jul;8(3):180-187. doi: 10.1177/2150131917696941. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
8
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Chemoprevention Use Among Veterans Affairs Primary Care Providers: A National Online Survey.退伍军人事务部初级保健提供者中乳腺癌风险评估和化学预防用药的使用:一项全国性在线调查。
Mil Med. 2020 Mar 2;185(3-4):512-518. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz291.
9
Nipple aspirate fluid cytology and the Gail model for breast cancer risk assessment in a screening population.筛查人群中乳头抽吸液细胞学检查及盖尔模型用于乳腺癌风险评估
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Feb;14(2):324-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0289.
10
Assessing risk of breast cancer in an ethnically South-East Asia population (results of a multiple ethnic groups study).评估东南亚族群人群的乳腺癌风险(一项多族群研究的结果)。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Nov 19;12:529. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-529.

引用本文的文献

1
Overlap of high-risk individuals across family history, genetic & non-genetic breast cancer risk models: Analysis of 180,398 women from European & Asian ancestries.家族史、遗传和非遗传乳腺癌风险模型中高危个体的重叠:对180398名欧洲和亚洲血统女性的分析。
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 3:2025.02.27.25323002. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.27.25323002.
2
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
2
Breast Cancer-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Prognostic Markers, and Current Treatment Strategies-An Updated Review.乳腺癌——流行病学、危险因素、分类、预后标志物及当前治疗策略——最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;13(17):4287. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174287.
3
Discriminatory Accuracy of the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment among Iranian Women.盖尔模型在伊朗女性乳腺癌风险评估中的判别准确性
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Nov;49(11):2205-2213. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i11.4739.
4
The Application of Gail Model to Predict the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer among Jordanian Women.盖尔模型在预测约旦女性患乳腺癌风险中的应用。
J Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;2020:9608910. doi: 10.1155/2020/9608910. eCollection 2020.
5
Gail Model Underestimates Breast Cancer Risk in Thai Population.盖尔模型低估了泰国人群的乳腺癌风险。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):2385-2389. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.8.2385.
6
Assessment of the Gail Model in Estimating the Risk of Breast Cancer: Effect of Cancer Worry and Risk in Healthy Women.评估盖尔模型在估计乳腺癌风险中的作用:癌症担忧和健康女性风险的影响
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):1765-1771. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1765.
7
Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.40000 名澳大利亚女性的 NCI 乳腺癌风险评估工具( Gail 模型)前瞻性验证。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1084-x.
8
Assessing Breast Cancer Risk Estimates Based on the Gail Model and Its Predictors in Qatari Women.基于盖尔模型及其预测因素评估卡塔尔女性的乳腺癌风险估计
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jul;8(3):180-187. doi: 10.1177/2150131917696941. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
9
Prevalence of chemopreventive agent use among hospitalised women at high risk for breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.乳腺癌高危住院女性中化学预防剂的使用情况:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 16;6(11):e012550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012550.
10
Chemoprevention for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌的化学预防
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3230-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4715-9. Epub 2015 Jul 23.