Suppr超能文献

电子干预对尼日利亚和肯尼亚互联网用户智力残疾污名化的影响:一项比较随机对照试验。

The effect of an e-intervention on intellectual disability stigma among Nigerian and Kenyan internet users: a comparative randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Odukoya Deborah, Chege Winfred, Scior Katrina

机构信息

Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 5;15:1331107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1331107. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The negative consequences of stigma for the wellbeing of people with disabilities have raised public and global health concerns. This study assessed the impact of an e-intervention to reduce intellectual disability (ID) stigma among Nigerian and Kenyan internet-users.

METHOD

Participants aged 18+ and citizens of Nigeria and Kenya were recruited through online advertising. Qualtrics, a web survey platform, randomly assigned (1:1) participants to watch either a short experimental or control film, while masked to their assignment. The experimental film featured education about ID and indirect contact. The control film was on an unrelated topic. Their attitudes were measured on three dimensions (affect, cognitions and behaviour) at three time points (baseline, post intervention and one-month follow-up). Between October 2016 and April 2017, 933 participants were randomised, 469 to the experimental condition and 464 to the control condition. Of these, 827 (89%) provided pre-and post-intervention data but only 287 (31%) were retained at follow-up.

RESULTS

An intent-to-treat analysis revealed that participants in the experimental but not the control condition showed a positive shift in their attitudes towards people with ID over time. Their willingness to interact with people with ID increased post-intervention.

DISCUSSION

A brief intervention that integrates education and indirect contact can make an effective contribution to efforts to reduce stigma faced by people with ID in Africa. Trial registered with the ISRCTN trial registry (number ISRCTN92574712).

摘要

引言

污名化对残疾人福祉产生的负面影响引发了公众和全球健康领域的关注。本研究评估了一项电子干预措施对减少尼日利亚和肯尼亚互联网用户中智力残疾(ID)污名化现象的影响。

方法

通过在线广告招募年龄在18岁及以上的尼日利亚和肯尼亚公民作为参与者。使用网络调查平台Qualtrics将参与者随机(1:1)分配观看一部简短的实验性影片或对照影片,同时对其分组情况保密。实验性影片内容为关于智力残疾的教育及间接接触。对照影片则是关于一个不相关的主题。在三个时间点(基线、干预后和1个月随访)从三个维度(情感、认知和行为)测量他们的态度。2016年10月至2017年4月期间,933名参与者被随机分组,469人进入实验组,464人进入对照组。其中,827人(89%)提供了干预前后的数据,但随访时仅保留了287人(31%)。

结果

意向性分析显示,随着时间推移,实验组成员而非对照组成员对智力残疾者的态度出现了积极转变。干预后他们与智力残疾者互动的意愿有所增加。

讨论

一项整合教育与间接接触的简短干预措施能够有效助力减少非洲智力残疾者所面临的污名化现象。该试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(编号ISRCTN92574712)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd06/10948596/223fc9bb363b/fpsyt-15-1331107-g001.jpg

相似文献

5
Tackling stigma associated with intellectual disability among the general public: a study of two indirect contact interventions.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jul;34(7):2200-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 3.
6
A randomised controlled trial of repeated filmed social contact on reducing mental illness-related stigma in young adults.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Apr;27(2):199-208. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001050. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
7
Online interventions to reduce stigma towards population groups affected by blood borne viruses in Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Oct;96:103292. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103292. Epub 2021 May 27.
8
Mainstream health professionals' stigmatising attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 May;61(5):411-434. doi: 10.1111/jir.12353. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
The effect of brief digital interventions on attitudes to intellectual disability: Results from a pilot study.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):106-113. doi: 10.1111/jar.12366. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Stigma, public awareness about intellectual disability and attitudes to inclusion among different ethnic groups.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Nov;57(11):1014-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01597.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Stigma, Acceptance and Belonging for People with IDD Across Cultures.
Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2020;7(3):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s40474-020-00206-w. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Development and psychometric properties of the Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire - Short Form.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Jun;63(6):539-547. doi: 10.1111/jir.12591. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
4
Consigned to the margins: a call for global action to challenge intellectual disability stigma.
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 May;4(5):e294-5. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)00060-7.
5
Changing teachers' negative attitudes toward persons with intellectual disabilities.
Behav Modif. 2015 May;39(3):367-89. doi: 10.1177/0145445514559929. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
6
Competing perspectives on erasing the stigma of illness: what says the dodo bird?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;103:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.027. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
7
Tackling stigma associated with intellectual disability among the general public: a study of two indirect contact interventions.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jul;34(7):2200-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 3.
8
Intellectual disability in Africa: implications for research and service development.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Sep;35(20):1750-5. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.751461. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
9
Public attitudes towards intellectual disability: a multidimensional perspective.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Mar;57(3):279-92. doi: 10.1111/jir.12008. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies.
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Oct;63(10):963-73. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100529.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验