Psychological Health and Readiness, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA; Leidos, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 May;173:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Depression frequently co-occurs with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including among active duty service members. However, symptom heterogeneity of this comorbidity is complex and its association with treatment outcomes is poorly understood, particularly among active duty service members in residential treatment. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify symptom-based subgroups of PTSD and depression among 282 male service members in a 10-week, residential PTSD treatment program with evidence-based PTSD psychotherapies and adjunctive interventions. The PTSD Checklist-Military Version and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 were completed by service members at pre- and posttreatment and weekly during treatment. Multilevel models compared subgroups on PTSD and depression symptom change across treatment. LPA indicated four subgroups provided optimal fit: Depressive (high depression severity, low PTSD avoidance; n = 33, 11.7%), Avoidant (high PTSD avoidance, moderate depression severity; n = 89, 31.6%), Moderate (moderate PTSD and depression severity; n = 27, 9.6%), and Distressed (high PTSD and depression severity; n = 133, 47.2%). Treatment response differed across classes for both PTSD and depression outcomes (time × LPA class interaction ps < 0.001). In PTSD models, post-hoc comparisons indicated the Moderate class was associated with less PTSD symptom improvement relative to the other classes (ps < 0.006). In depression models, symptom reduction was greatest for the Distressed and Depressive subgroups relative to the other two classes (ps < 0.009). Study results provide an initial model for two prevalent, impairing disorders among service members and show how these symptom-based subgroups may differentially respond to residential PTSD treatment.
抑郁经常与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)共病,包括现役军人。然而,这种共病的症状异质性复杂,其与治疗结果的关系尚不清楚,尤其是在现役军人的住院治疗中。本研究使用潜在剖面分析(LPA),对 282 名男性现役军人在为期 10 周的 PTSD 住院治疗计划中的 PTSD 和抑郁症状进行基于症状的亚组分析,该计划采用基于循证的 PTSD 心理治疗和辅助干预措施。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗期间每周,服务人员使用 PTSD 检查表-军事版和患者健康问卷-8 进行评估。多水平模型比较了亚组在治疗过程中 PTSD 和抑郁症状的变化。LPA 表明四个亚组具有最佳拟合度:抑郁型(高抑郁严重程度,低 PTSD 回避;n=33,11.7%)、回避型(高 PTSD 回避,中等抑郁严重程度;n=89,31.6%)、中等型(中等 PTSD 和抑郁严重程度;n=27,9.6%)和痛苦型(高 PTSD 和抑郁严重程度;n=133,47.2%)。对于 PTSD 和抑郁结果,不同的亚组在治疗过程中表现出不同的反应(时间×LPA 类别的交互作用 p 值<0.001)。在 PTSD 模型中,事后比较表明,中等组与其他组相比,PTSD 症状改善程度较低(p 值<0.006)。在抑郁模型中,痛苦和抑郁亚组的症状减轻程度相对于其他两个亚组最大(p 值<0.009)。研究结果为现役军人中两种常见的、致残的疾病提供了一个初步模型,并表明这些基于症状的亚组可能对住院 PTSD 治疗有不同的反应。