• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和治疗结果:居住性 PTSD 项目中现役人员的潜在剖面分析。

PTSD, depression, and treatment outcomes: A latent profile analysis among active duty personnel in a residential PTSD program.

机构信息

Psychological Health and Readiness, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA; Leidos, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2024 May;173:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.010
PMID:38508035
Abstract

Depression frequently co-occurs with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including among active duty service members. However, symptom heterogeneity of this comorbidity is complex and its association with treatment outcomes is poorly understood, particularly among active duty service members in residential treatment. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify symptom-based subgroups of PTSD and depression among 282 male service members in a 10-week, residential PTSD treatment program with evidence-based PTSD psychotherapies and adjunctive interventions. The PTSD Checklist-Military Version and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 were completed by service members at pre- and posttreatment and weekly during treatment. Multilevel models compared subgroups on PTSD and depression symptom change across treatment. LPA indicated four subgroups provided optimal fit: Depressive (high depression severity, low PTSD avoidance; n = 33, 11.7%), Avoidant (high PTSD avoidance, moderate depression severity; n = 89, 31.6%), Moderate (moderate PTSD and depression severity; n = 27, 9.6%), and Distressed (high PTSD and depression severity; n = 133, 47.2%). Treatment response differed across classes for both PTSD and depression outcomes (time × LPA class interaction ps < 0.001). In PTSD models, post-hoc comparisons indicated the Moderate class was associated with less PTSD symptom improvement relative to the other classes (ps < 0.006). In depression models, symptom reduction was greatest for the Distressed and Depressive subgroups relative to the other two classes (ps < 0.009). Study results provide an initial model for two prevalent, impairing disorders among service members and show how these symptom-based subgroups may differentially respond to residential PTSD treatment.

摘要

抑郁经常与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)共病,包括现役军人。然而,这种共病的症状异质性复杂,其与治疗结果的关系尚不清楚,尤其是在现役军人的住院治疗中。本研究使用潜在剖面分析(LPA),对 282 名男性现役军人在为期 10 周的 PTSD 住院治疗计划中的 PTSD 和抑郁症状进行基于症状的亚组分析,该计划采用基于循证的 PTSD 心理治疗和辅助干预措施。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗期间每周,服务人员使用 PTSD 检查表-军事版和患者健康问卷-8 进行评估。多水平模型比较了亚组在治疗过程中 PTSD 和抑郁症状的变化。LPA 表明四个亚组具有最佳拟合度:抑郁型(高抑郁严重程度,低 PTSD 回避;n=33,11.7%)、回避型(高 PTSD 回避,中等抑郁严重程度;n=89,31.6%)、中等型(中等 PTSD 和抑郁严重程度;n=27,9.6%)和痛苦型(高 PTSD 和抑郁严重程度;n=133,47.2%)。对于 PTSD 和抑郁结果,不同的亚组在治疗过程中表现出不同的反应(时间×LPA 类别的交互作用 p 值<0.001)。在 PTSD 模型中,事后比较表明,中等组与其他组相比,PTSD 症状改善程度较低(p 值<0.006)。在抑郁模型中,痛苦和抑郁亚组的症状减轻程度相对于其他两个亚组最大(p 值<0.009)。研究结果为现役军人中两种常见的、致残的疾病提供了一个初步模型,并表明这些基于症状的亚组可能对住院 PTSD 治疗有不同的反应。

相似文献

1
PTSD, depression, and treatment outcomes: A latent profile analysis among active duty personnel in a residential PTSD program.创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和治疗结果:居住性 PTSD 项目中现役人员的潜在剖面分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 May;173:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Overcoming Adversity and Stress Injury Support (OASIS): Evaluation of Residential Treatment Outcomes for U.S. Service Members with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.克服逆境和应激损伤支持(OASIS):对美国创伤后应激障碍军人的住院治疗结果评估。
J Trauma Stress. 2021 Jun;34(3):551-562. doi: 10.1002/jts.22652. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Residual posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms following a residential posttraumatic stress disorder treatment program for U.S. active duty service members.美国现役军人在接受创伤后应激障碍住院治疗项目后残留的创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 3):S502-S510. doi: 10.1037/tra0001621. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Latent Profiles of Comorbid Depression as Predictors of PTSD Treatment Outcome.共病抑郁的潜在特征对 PTSD 治疗结果的预测。
Behav Ther. 2021 Jul;52(4):970-981. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Prospective post-traumatic stress disorder symptom trajectories in active duty and separated military personnel.现役和退役军人创伤后应激障碍症状的前瞻性轨迹
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jun;89:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
6
Latent Neuropsychological Profiles to Discriminate Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Active-Duty Service Members.潜伏性神经心理学特征可区分现役军人中的轻度创伤性脑损伤和创伤后应激障碍。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(6):E438-E448. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000779. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Qualitative examination of cognitive change during PTSD treatment for active duty service members.现役军人创伤后应激障碍治疗期间认知变化的定性研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Apr;79:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
Depression Suppresses Treatment Response for Traumatic Loss-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Active Duty Military Personnel.抑郁会抑制现役军人创伤相关创伤后应激障碍的治疗反应。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Oct;32(5):774-783. doi: 10.1002/jts.22441. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
A randomized clinical trial of group cognitive processing therapy compared with group present-centered therapy for PTSD among active duty military personnel.一项针对现役军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验:团体认知加工疗法与团体以当下为中心疗法的比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1058-1068. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000016. Epub 2015 May 4.
10
Typologies of Combat Exposure and Their Effects on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression Symptoms.战斗暴露的类型及其对创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的影响。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Dec;32(6):946-956. doi: 10.1002/jts.22459. Epub 2019 Oct 25.