The Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermia Intravesical Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION

The current treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is suboptimal. However, in recent years, hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) has emerged as a more effective alternative to conventional bladder perfusion. This novel treatment approach appears to have a similar therapeutic effect as Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) perfusion. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HIVEC compared to conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Additionally, it aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HIVEC in comparison to BCG perfusion therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to gather relevant studies on HIVEC for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The analysis of the collected data was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis, involving 1,203 patients. Among them, 629 cases received HIVEC, 419 cases received conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy with mitomycin C, and 155 cases received BCG. The combined analysis revealed that the recurrence rate of bladder hyperthermic perfusion was significantly lower than that of conventional perfusion chemotherapy (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.82, p = 0.0003). However, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate between HIVEC and BCG perfusion (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.09, p = 0.14). Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the progression rate between the HIVEC group and either the conventional bladder chemotherapy group (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.52, 2.26, p = 0.83) and the BCG perfusion group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.25, p = 0.13). However, compared with the conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy group, there was no significant statistical difference in adverse events between the bladder hyperthermia chemotherapy group and the conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy group (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.45, p = 0.63). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between HIVEC and BCG perfusion (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.29, p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

The existing results indicate that HIVEC, when compared to conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy, can lower the recurrence rate of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, it does not significantly affect the progression rate. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the incidence of adverse events between the use of HIVEC and conventional chemotherapy. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate, progression rate, and incidence of adverse events when compared to BCG.