• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达巴万星及其他十四种抗菌药物对希腊一家三级护理医院产毒艰难梭菌临床分离株的体外活性

In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin and Fourteen Other Antimicrobial Agents Against Toxigenic Clostridioides Difficile Clinical Isolates in a Greek Tertiary-Care Hospital.

作者信息

Maraki Sofia, Mavromanolaki Viktoria Eirini, Stafylaki Dimitra, Iliaki-Giannakoudaki Evangelia, Kasimati Anna

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2024 Mar 20;33(4):392-8. doi: 10.1159/000538414.

DOI:10.1159/000538414
PMID:38508157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11324207/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea worldwide. For years, metronidazole and vancomycin were considered the standard treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI). However, they are increasingly being associated with treatment failure and recurrence. In this study we investigated the in vitro activity of dalbavancin and fourteen other antimicrobials against 155 toxigenic C. difficile isolates originating from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the MIC Test Strip and the results were interpreted using both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints.

RESULTS

C. difficile isolates were fully susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin, amoxicillin/ clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. All isolates were dalbavancin susceptible by the CLSI breakpoint (≤ 0.25 μg/ml) compared with 97.4% susceptibility by the EUCAST breakpoint (≤ 0.125 μg/ml). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to vancomycin (0.047 vs. 0.38 and 0.125 vs. 0.5, respectively, p < 0.001). Resistance rates to penicillin, ampicilin, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline were 20%, 14.2% , 100%, 75.5%, 0.6%, 51%, 36.1%, 3.2%, and 14.8%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 41.3% of the isolates.

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity against the isolates tested. As C. difficile is an important healthcare-associated pathogen, continued surveillance is required to monitor for development of resistance.

摘要

目的

艰难梭菌是全球医疗保健相关腹泻的主要病因。多年来,甲硝唑和万古霉素一直被视为艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的标准治疗药物。然而,它们与治疗失败和复发的关联日益增加。在本研究中,我们调查了达巴万星和其他十四种抗菌药物对155株源自艰难梭菌相关性腹泻患者的产毒艰难梭菌分离株的体外活性。

材料与方法

采用MIC测试条评估抗菌药物敏感性,并使用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)及欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)的断点解释结果。

结果

艰难梭菌分离株对甲硝唑、万古霉素、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和替加环素完全敏感。根据CLSI断点(≤0.25μg/ml),所有分离株对达巴万星敏感,而根据EUCAST断点(≤0.125μg/ml),敏感性为97.4%。与万古霉素相比,达巴万星的MIC50和MIC90值显著更低(分别为0.047对0.38以及0.125对0.5,p<0.001)。对青霉素、氨苄西林、头孢西丁、亚胺培南、美罗培南、克林霉素、莫西沙星、氯霉素和四环素的耐药率分别为20%、14.2%、100%、75.5%、0.6%、51%、36.1%、3.2%和14.8%。41.3%的分离株检测到多重耐药(MDR)表型。

结论

达巴万星对测试的分离株表现出强大的活性。由于艰难梭菌是一种重要的医疗保健相关病原体,需要持续监测以监测耐药性的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026a/11324207/3362cebd7882/mpp-2024-0033-0004-538414_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026a/11324207/3362cebd7882/mpp-2024-0033-0004-538414_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026a/11324207/3362cebd7882/mpp-2024-0033-0004-538414_F01.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin and Fourteen Other Antimicrobial Agents Against Toxigenic Clostridioides Difficile Clinical Isolates in a Greek Tertiary-Care Hospital.达巴万星及其他十四种抗菌药物对希腊一家三级护理医院产毒艰难梭菌临床分离株的体外活性
Med Princ Pract. 2024 Mar 20;33(4):392-8. doi: 10.1159/000538414.
2
[In Vitro Activities of Antimicrobials Against Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Isolates Obtained in a University Training and Research Hospital in Turkey].[土耳其一家大学培训与研究医院分离出的产毒艰难梭菌分离株对抗菌药物的体外活性]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jul;54(3):368-377. doi: 10.5578/mb.69427.
3
[Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pathogenic Gram-positive Anaerobic Cocci: Data of a University Hospital in Turkey].[致病性革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌的抗菌药敏性:土耳其一家大学医院的数据]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jul;54(3):404-417. doi: 10.5578/mb.69556.
4
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of clinically significant Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria in a Greek tertiary-care hospital, 2017-2019.2017-2019 年希腊一家三级保健医院临床重要革兰阳性厌氧细菌的药敏模式。
Anaerobe. 2020 Aug;64:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102245. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌属)源于人类的抗微生物药物耐药性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Sep 25;9(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00815-5.
6
The emergence of metronidazole and vancomycin reduced susceptibility in Clostridium difficile isolates in Iran.甲硝唑和万古霉素的出现降低了伊朗艰难梭菌分离株的敏感性。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Sep;18:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.01.027. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile isolated from diarrhoeal stool specimens of Canadian patients: summary of results from the Canadian Clostridioides difficile (CAN-DIFF) surveillance study from 2013 to 2017.加拿大患者腹泻粪便标本中分离的艰难梭菌的药敏情况:2013 年至 2017 年加拿大艰难梭菌(CAN-DIFF)监测研究的结果摘要。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Jul 1;75(7):1824-1832. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa118.
8
Antimicrobial resistance progression in the United Kingdom: A temporal comparison of Clostridioides difficile antimicrobial susceptibilities.英国抗菌药物耐药性进展:艰难梭菌抗菌药物敏感性的时间比较。
Anaerobe. 2021 Aug;70:102385. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102385. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Reference Susceptibility Testing and Genomic Surveillance of Clostridioides difficile, United States, 2012-17.美国 2012-2017 年艰难梭菌的药敏试验和基因组监测
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 4;76(5):890-896. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac817.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated in Thailand.泰国分离株的抗菌药敏性。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017 Jun 8;6:58. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0214-z. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic Resistance Profile of RT 027/176 Versus Other Isolates in Silesia, Southern Poland.波兰南部西里西亚地区RT 027/176与其他分离株的抗生素耐药性概况
Pathogens. 2022 Aug 22;11(8):949. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11080949.
2
Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Clostridium difficile among hospitalized diarrheal patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.艰难梭菌在住院腹泻患者中的流行情况及耐药模式:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262597. eCollection 2022.
3
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults.
欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会:成人艰难梭菌感染治疗指南的 2021 年更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27 Suppl 2:S1-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults.美国传染病学会 (IDSA) 和美国医疗保健流行病学学会 (SHEA) 的临床实践指南:2021 年关于成人艰难梭菌感染管理的重点更新指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):755-757. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab718.
5
Antimicrobial resistance progression in the United Kingdom: A temporal comparison of Clostridioides difficile antimicrobial susceptibilities.英国抗菌药物耐药性进展:艰难梭菌抗菌药物敏感性的时间比较。
Anaerobe. 2021 Aug;70:102385. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102385. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Clostridioides difficile in Australia, 2015-18.澳大利亚艰难梭菌的抗菌药物耐药性监测,2015-2018 年。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jun 18;76(7):1815-1821. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab099.
7
Mortality Following Infection in Europe: A Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study.欧洲感染后的死亡率:一项回顾性多中心病例对照研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;10(3):299. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030299.
8
Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌属)源于人类的抗微生物药物耐药性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Sep 25;9(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00815-5.
9
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of clinically significant Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria in a Greek tertiary-care hospital, 2017-2019.2017-2019 年希腊一家三级保健医院临床重要革兰阳性厌氧细菌的药敏模式。
Anaerobe. 2020 Aug;64:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102245. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile Isolates from 12 Asia-Pacific Countries in 2014 and 2015.2014 年和 2015 年来自亚太地区 12 个国家的艰难梭菌分离株的抗菌药敏性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00296-20.