Department of Rehabilitation, Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University.
Circ J. 2024 Apr 25;88(5):713-721. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0925. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Low muscle mass in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor prognosis; however, this is based on a single baseline measurement, with little information on changes in muscle mass during hospitalization and their clinical implications. This study investigated the relationship between changes in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RFCSA) on ultrasound and the prognosis of patients with AHF.
This is a retrospective evaluation of 284 AHF patients (mean [±SD] age 79.1±11.9 years; 116 female). RFCSA assessments at admission (pre-RFCSA), ∆RFCSA (i.e., the percentage change in RFCSA from admission to 2 weeks), and composite prognosis (all-cause death and heart failure-related readmission) within 1 year were determined. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their median pre-RFCSA and ∆RFCSA after sex stratification: Group A, higher pre-RFCSA/better ∆RFCSA; Group B, higher pre-RFCSA/worse ∆RFCSA; Group C, lower pre-RFCSA/better ∆RFCSA; Group D, lower pre-RFCSA/worse ∆RFCSA. In the Cox regression analysis, with Group A as the reference, the cumulative event rate of Group C (hazard ratio [HR] 3.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-16.09; P=0.124) did not differ significantly; however, the cumulative event rates of Group B (HR 7.93; 95% CI 1.99-31.60; P=0.003) and Group D (HR 9.24; 95% CI 2.57-33.26; P<0.001) were significantly higher.
∆RFCSA during hospitalization is useful for risk assessment of prognosis in patients with AHF.
急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的肌肉量低与预后不良相关;然而,这是基于单次基线测量得出的,关于住院期间肌肉量的变化及其临床意义的信息较少。本研究探讨了超声测量股直肌横截面积(RFCSA)变化与 AHF 患者预后的关系。
这是对 284 例 AHF 患者(平均[±SD]年龄 79.1±11.9 岁;116 例女性)的回顾性评估。测定入院时(入院前 RFCSA,即 pre-RFCSA)、ΔRFCSA(即入院至 2 周时 RFCSA 的百分比变化)和 1 年内复合预后(全因死亡和心力衰竭相关再入院)。根据入院时 pre-RFCSA 和性别分层后的 ΔRFCSA 的中位数,将患者分为 4 组:A 组,较高的 pre-RFCSA/更好的 ΔRFCSA;B 组,较高的 pre-RFCSA/更差的 ΔRFCSA;C 组,较低的 pre-RFCSA/更好的 ΔRFCSA;D 组,较低的 pre-RFCSA/更差的 ΔRFCSA。在 Cox 回归分析中,以 A 组为参照,C 组的累积事件发生率(风险比 [HR] 3.39;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.71-16.09;P=0.124)差异无统计学意义;然而,B 组(HR 7.93;95% CI 1.99-31.60;P=0.003)和 D 组(HR 9.24;95% CI 2.57-33.26;P<0.001)的累积事件发生率显著更高。
住院期间的 ΔRFCSA 对评估 AHF 患者的预后风险有用。