Suppr超能文献

超声评估股四头肌参数与血液透析患者蛋白质能量消耗的相关性:一项多中心横断面研究。

Association of Ultrasound-Derived Metrics of the Quadriceps Muscle with Protein Energy Wasting in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Dietetics Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Nov 23;12(11):3597. doi: 10.3390/nu12113597.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess muscle wasting and risk of protein energy wasting (PEW) in hemodialysis (HD) patients using an ultrasound (US) imaging method. PEW was identified using the ISRNM criteria in 351 HD patients. Quadriceps muscle thickness of (RF) and (VI) muscles and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the RF muscle (RF) were measured using US and compared with other physical measures. Associations of US indices with PEW were determined by logistic regression. Irrespective of gender, PEW vs. non-PEW patients had smaller RF, VI muscles, and RF (all < 0.001). US muscle sites (all < 0.001) discriminated PEW from non-PEW patients, but the RF compared to bio-impedance spectroscopy had a greater area under the curve (AUC, 0.686 vs. 0.581), sensitivity (72.8% vs. 65.8%), and specificity (55.6% vs. 53.9%). AUC of the RF was greatest for PEW risk in men (0.74, 95% CI: 0.66-0.82) and women (0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.90) (both < 0.001). Gender-specific RF values (men < 6.00 cm; women < 4.47 cm) indicated HD patients with smaller RF were 8 times more likely to have PEW (AOR = 8.63, 95% CI: 4.80-15.50, < 0.001). The US approach enabled discrimination of muscle wasting in HD patients with PEW. The RF was identified as the best US site with gender-specific RF values to associate with PEW risk, suggesting potential diagnostic criteria for muscle wasting.

摘要

这项研究旨在使用超声(US)成像方法评估血液透析(HD)患者的肌肉减少和蛋白质能量消耗(PEW)风险。在 351 名 HD 患者中,使用 ISRNM 标准确定 PEW。使用 US 测量股四头肌厚度(RF)和 VI 肌肉和 RF 肌肉的横截面积(CSA),并与其他物理测量值进行比较。通过逻辑回归确定 US 指数与 PEW 的关联。无论性别如何,PEW 与非 PEW 患者的 RF、VI 肌肉和 RF 均较小(均<0.001)。US 肌肉部位(均<0.001)可区分 PEW 与非 PEW 患者,但与生物电阻抗光谱法相比,RF 的曲线下面积(AUC,0.686 与 0.581)、灵敏度(72.8%与 65.8%)和特异性(55.6%与 53.9%)更高。RF 的 AUC 对男性(0.74,95%CI:0.66-0.82)和女性(0.80,95%CI:0.70-0.90)的 PEW 风险最大(均<0.001)。特定性别 RF 值(男性<6.00cm;女性<4.47cm)表明,RF 较小的 HD 患者发生 PEW 的可能性高 8 倍(AOR=8.63,95%CI:4.80-15.50,<0.001)。US 方法能够区分 PEW 的 HD 患者的肌肉减少。RF 被确定为具有性别特异性 RF 值的最佳 US 部位,与 PEW 风险相关,提示肌肉减少的潜在诊断标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83d/7700501/254120da1b46/nutrients-12-03597-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验