• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响后牙复合树脂修复体寿命的因素:一项牙科大学诊所研究。

Factors influencing the longevity of posterior composite restorations: A dental university clinic study.

作者信息

Ulku Sultan Gizem, Unlu Nimet

机构信息

Konya Meram Oral and Dental Health Hospital, Konya, Turkey.

Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Mar 8;10(6):e27735. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27735. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27735
PMID:38509902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10950679/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study aimed to assess the performance of posterior composite resin restorations (PCRRs) and evaluate the influence of patient-specific factors on restoration outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 189 PCRRs were examined in 54 patients, with evaluations based on Modified USPHS criteria. Patient-specific factors were analyzed. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests, and ANOVA tests, were conducted.

RESULTS

Patients aged over 50 exhibited higher DMFT averages and a higher rate of unsuccessful restorations. Despite higher DMFT scores in females, gender doesn't significantly impact restoration outcomes. Secondary caries correlated with.plaque scores, significantly affecting restoration survival. Marginal adaptation, retention deficiencies, and secondary caries were primary causes of failure. Multi-surface restorations faced higher failure risk due to elevated plaque scores. Class-V restorations showed a higher failure rate, challenging the number of surfaces and longevity correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified key factors influencing posterior composite resin restorations-(PCRRs) in patients over 50, including higher DMFT averages and more unsuccessful restorations. No significant difference was found between brushing; frequency and DMFT rates, possibly due to the absence of non-brushers. Secondary caries; correlated with elevated plaque scores, impacting restoration survival. Primary causes of; failure included marginal adaptation issues, retention deficiencies, and secondary caries, with multi-surface restorations facing a higher risk. However, tooth vitality, beverage and acidic food consumption, and oral hygiene habits did not significantly affect PCRR outcomes.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Patient-specific factors significantly impact PCRRs' long-term performance. Dentists must tailor strategies, emphasizing regular monitoring and preventive measures for extended survival.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估后牙复合树脂修复体(PCRRs)的性能,并评估患者特异性因素对修复结果的影响。

方法

对54例患者的189个PCRRs进行检查,根据改良的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准进行评估。分析患者特异性因素。进行了包括卡方检验、独立样本t检验和方差分析在内的统计分析。

结果

50岁以上患者的龋失补牙面(DMFT)平均值较高,修复失败率也较高。尽管女性的DMFT评分较高,但性别对修复结果没有显著影响。继发龋与菌斑评分相关,显著影响修复体的存留率。边缘适应性、固位不足和继发龋是失败的主要原因。多面修复体由于菌斑评分升高面临更高的失败风险。V类修复体显示出更高的失败率,对修复面数量与修复体寿命之间的相关性提出了挑战。

结论

本研究确定了影响50岁以上患者后牙复合树脂修复体(PCRRs)的关键因素,包括较高的DMFT平均值和更多的修复失败。刷牙频率与DMFT率之间未发现显著差异,可能是因为没有不刷牙的患者。继发龋与菌斑评分升高相关,影响修复体的存留率。失败的主要原因包括边缘适应性问题、固位不足和继发龋,多面修复体面临更高的风险。然而,牙齿活力、饮料和酸性食物的摄入以及口腔卫生习惯对PCRRs的结果没有显著影响。

临床意义

患者特异性因素显著影响PCRRs的长期性能。牙医必须制定相应策略,强调定期监测和预防措施以延长修复体使用寿命。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing the longevity of posterior composite restorations: A dental university clinic study.影响后牙复合树脂修复体寿命的因素:一项牙科大学诊所研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 8;10(6):e27735. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27735. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
2
Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.直接光激活复合树脂修复后牙的质量和存活率:一项 5 至 20 年的回顾性纵向研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e195-e203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.龋病体验较高和收入轨迹较低会影响修复体的质量:出生队列的多层次分析。
J Dent. 2018 Jan;68:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.回顾性临床研究的颈椎修复体:长期效果和失败预后变量。
Oper Dent. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):376-85. doi: 10.2341/11-416-C. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
5
Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.年轻恒牙龋病完全和选择性去除后粘结修复体的长期存留情况及相关危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Apr;21(3):847-855. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1832-1. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
6
Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.直接树脂复合材料嵌体/高嵌体:11年随访
J Dent. 2000 Jul;28(5):299-306. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00010-5.
7
Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies.后牙直接树脂修复体在19年期间(1996 - 2015年)的存留情况:前瞻性研究的荟萃分析
Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):958-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.后牙直接复合树脂修复体的回顾性评估:10年随访结果
Dent Mater. 2015 Feb;31(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
9
A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.一项关于三种传统树脂复合材料在 II 类修复体中 30 年随机对照研究的长期随访。
Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1232-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.146. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.后牙复合树脂修复体的临床评估:十年报告
J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):185-94.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten-Year Survival of Class II Restorations Placed by General Practitioners.全科医生进行的II类修复体的十年留存率
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016 Oct;1(3):292-299. doi: 10.1177/2380084416663192.
2
Treatment Outcome of Posterior Composite Indirect Restorations: A Retrospective 20-Year Analysis of 525 Cases with a Mean Follow-up of 87 Months.后牙复合树脂间接修复体的治疗效果:525例患者的20年回顾性分析,平均随访87个月
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;38(5):655-663. doi: 10.11607/prd.3471.
3
Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?我的复合树脂修复体应该能永久使用吗?它们为什么会失败?
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 28;31(suppl 1):e56. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0056.
4
Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.直接光激活复合树脂修复后牙的质量和存活率:一项 5 至 20 年的回顾性纵向研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e195-e203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
[A PhD completed 5. Restoration survival in the composite resin age].[一名博士完成了5. 复合树脂时代的修复体存留率]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2016 Sep;123(9):429-31. doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2016.09.16182.
6
Prevalence of Dental Caries in Kosovar Adult Population.科索沃成年人口中龋齿的患病率。
Int J Dent. 2016;2016:4290291. doi: 10.1155/2016/4290291. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.对三种树脂复合材料用于Ⅱ类洞修复进行的27年随机对照随访研究。
J Dent. 2015 Dec;43(12):1547-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
8
A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.一项关于三种传统树脂复合材料在 II 类修复体中 30 年随机对照研究的长期随访。
Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1232-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.146. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.后牙直接复合树脂修复体的回顾性评估:10年随访结果
Dent Mater. 2015 Feb;31(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.乳牙后牙修复体的使用寿命:一家儿科牙科诊所的结果
J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 20.