Sazdovski Ilija, Batlle-Bayer Laura, Bala Alba, Margallo Maria, Azarkamand Sahar, Aldaco Ruben, Fullana-I-Palmer Pere
UNESCO Chair in Life Cycle and Climate Change ESCI-UPF, Passeig Pujades 1, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
University of Cantabria, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Avda, De los Castros. s.n, 39005, Santander, Spain.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 12;10(6):e27922. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27922. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
Sustainable packaging is a crucial focus in the context of circular economy efforts. This study evaluates the circularity of two secondary packaging systems used in Spanish fresh food produces: Reusable Plastic Crates and Single-use Cardboard Boxes. A Mass Flow Analysis was performed to assess the material flows in the production and use phases of both systems and two circular indicators were applied: the Material Circularity Indicator and Product Circular Indicator. While most previous studies for single-use packaging use these indicators at the product level, this study applies a system approach since the Reusable Plastic Crates can be reused 100 times. The functional unit was defined as the distribution of 1000 tonnes of fresh products, resulting in the distribution of 6,666,700 packages with 15 kg of products. The Material Circularity Indicator and Product Circular Indicator results show that Reusable Plastic Crates are more circular than Single-use Cardboard Boxes. The Product Circular Indicator provides a more comprehensive assessment of circularity by considering multiple life cycle stages, efficiency, and unrecoverable waste, resulting in a difference in circularity evaluations. The indicators used have limitations as they do not consider the resource stock. Further research is needed to explore this aspect.
在循环经济努力的背景下,可持续包装是一个关键重点。本研究评估了西班牙新鲜食品生产中使用的两种二级包装系统的循环性:可重复使用塑料箱和一次性纸板箱。进行了质量流分析,以评估两种系统在生产和使用阶段的物质流,并应用了两个循环指标:材料循环指标和产品循环指标。虽然之前大多数关于一次性包装的研究在产品层面使用这些指标,但本研究采用系统方法,因为可重复使用塑料箱可重复使用100次。功能单元被定义为1000吨新鲜产品的配送,这导致配送6,666,700个装有15千克产品的包装。材料循环指标和产品循环指标的结果表明,可重复使用塑料箱比一次性纸板箱更具循环性。产品循环指标通过考虑多个生命周期阶段、效率和不可回收废物,对循环性提供了更全面的评估,从而导致循环性评估存在差异。所使用的指标存在局限性,因为它们没有考虑资源存量。需要进一步研究来探索这一方面。