文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Attitude towards consent-free research use of personal medical data in the general German population.

作者信息

Richter Gesine, Trigui Nourane, Caliebe Amke, Krawczak Michael

机构信息

Institute of Experimental Medicine, Division of Biomedical Ethics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Borstel, Germany.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Mar 11;10(6):e27933. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27933. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.


DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27933
PMID:38509969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10951576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The design of appropriate consent procedures for the secondary use of personal health data is a key concern of current medical research. In Germany, the concept of 'data donation' has recently come into focus, defined as a legal entitlement to the research use of personal medical data without prior consent, combined with an easy-to-exercise right of the data subjects to opt-out. METHODS: Standardized online interviews of 3,013 individuals, representative of the German online population, were conducted in August 2022 to determine their attitude towards data donation for medical research. RESULTS: A majority of participants supported a consent-free data donation regulation, both for publicly funded (85.1%) and for private medical research (66.4%). Major predictors of a positive attitude towards data donation included (i) sufficient appreciation of the respective kind of research (i.e. public or private), (ii) a reciprocity attitude that patients who benefit from research have a duty to support research, and (iii) sufficient trust in data protection and data control. CONCLUSION: People's attitude towards data donation to medical research is generally positive in Germany and depends upon factors that can be curbed by legislation and internal rules of procedure. Worthy of note, designing data donation in the form of an opt-out regulation does not necessarily mean that the paradigm of informedness has to be abandoned. Rather the process of information provision must be shifted towards the creation of basic knowledge in the general population about the risks and benefits of data-intensive medical research ('health data literacy').

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Attitude towards consent-free research use of personal medical data in the general German population.

Heliyon. 2024-3-11

[2]
Secondary research use of personal medical data: patient attitudes towards data donation.

BMC Med Ethics. 2021-12-15

[3]
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-10

[4]
[The origin of informed consent].

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005-10

[5]
Awareness of legislation moderates the effect of opt-out consent on organ donation intentions.

Transplantation. 2013-4-27

[6]
Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2021-3

[7]
Opt-Out Consent at Different Levels of Attitude to Organ Donation: A Household Survey in Qatar.

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021-2-18

[8]
How to Elucidate Consent-Free Research Use of Medical Data: A Case for "Health Data Literacy".

JMIR Med Inform. 2024-6-18

[9]
[Presumed consent for organ donation? : A survey among members of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine].

Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020-4

[10]
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.

Health Technol Assess. 2009-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
The Impact of Trust and the Role of the Opt-Out Mechanism in Willingness to Share Health Data via Electronic Health Records in Germany: Telephone Survey Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025-4-15

[2]
Health data sharing in Germany: individual preconditions, trust and motives.

Front Public Health. 2025-2-5

[3]
Broad consent in the emergency department: a cross sectional study.

Arch Public Health. 2025-2-18

[4]
Survey of attitudes in a Danish public towards reuse of health data.

PLoS One. 2024-12-26

[5]
How to Elucidate Consent-Free Research Use of Medical Data: A Case for "Health Data Literacy".

JMIR Med Inform. 2024-6-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
How to Elucidate Consent-Free Research Use of Medical Data: A Case for "Health Data Literacy".

JMIR Med Inform. 2024-6-18

[2]
Deliberation, context, emotion and trust - understanding the dynamics of adults' COVID-19 vaccination decisions in Germany.

BMC Public Health. 2023-1-19

[3]
Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-8-25

[4]
Patient consent preferences on sharing personal health information during the COVID-19 pandemic: "the more informed we are, the more likely we are to help".

BMC Med Ethics. 2022-5-20

[5]
Italian public's views on sharing genetic information and medical information: findings from the 'Your DNA, Your Say' study.

Wellcome Open Res. 2021-7-12

[6]
Secondary research use of personal medical data: patient attitudes towards data donation.

BMC Med Ethics. 2021-12-15

[7]
A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.

Syst Rev. 2021-5-4

[8]
The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution.

BMC Med Ethics. 2021-3-24

[9]
Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2021-3

[10]
Control, trust and the sharing of health information: the limits of trust.

J Med Ethics. 2020-8-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索