• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦公众对健康数据再利用的态度调查。

Survey of attitudes in a Danish public towards reuse of health data.

作者信息

Skovgaard Lea, Ekstrøm Claus Thorn, Svendsen Mette N, Hoeyer Klaus

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0312558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312558. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312558
PMID:39724084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671018/
Abstract

Everyday clinical care generates vast amounts of digital data. A broad range of actors are interested in reusing these data for various purposes. Such reuse of health data could support medical research, healthcare planning, technological innovation, and lead to increased financial revenue. Yet, reuse also raises questions about what data subjects think about the use of health data for various different purposes. Based on a survey with 1071 respondents conducted in 2021 in Denmark, this article explores attitudes to health data reuse. Denmark is renowned for its advanced integration of data infrastructures, facilitating data reuse. This is therefore a relevant setting from which to explore public attitudes to reuse, both as authorities around the globe are currently working to facilitate data reuse opportunities, and in the light of the recent agreement on the establishment in 2024 of the European Health Data Space (EHDS) within the European Union (EU). Our study suggests that there are certain forms of health data reuse-namely transnational data sharing, commercial involvement, and use of data as national economic assets-which risk undermining public support for health data reuse. However, some of the purposes that the EHDS is supposed to facilitate are these three controversial purposes. Failure to address these public concerns could well challenge the long-term legitimacy and sustainability of the data infrastructures currently under construction.

摘要

日常临床护理会产生大量数字数据。众多行为主体都有意出于各种目的重新利用这些数据。这种对健康数据的再利用能够支持医学研究、医疗规划、技术创新,并带来财政收入的增加。然而,再利用也引发了一些问题,比如数据主体对于将健康数据用于各种不同目的的看法。基于2021年在丹麦对1071名受访者进行的一项调查,本文探讨了对健康数据再利用的态度。丹麦以其先进的数据基础设施整合而闻名,这有助于数据再利用。因此,鉴于全球各国政府目前都在努力创造数据再利用机会,并且鉴于欧盟近期就2024年建立欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)达成了协议,丹麦是一个探讨公众对再利用态度的相关背景。我们的研究表明,存在某些形式的健康数据再利用——即跨国数据共享、商业参与以及将数据用作国家经济资产——这些存在破坏公众对健康数据再利用支持的风险。然而,EHDS旨在推动的一些目的正是这三个有争议的目的。如果不能解决这些公众关切,很可能会对当前正在建设的数据基础设施的长期合法性和可持续性构成挑战。

相似文献

1
Survey of attitudes in a Danish public towards reuse of health data.丹麦公众对健康数据再利用的态度调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0312558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312558. eCollection 2024.
2
A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good.欧盟民众对健康数据再利用态度的综述:目的至上和共同利益。
Health Policy. 2019 Jun;123(6):564-571. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide.数据共享、管理、使用和再利用:全球科学家的实践和看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229003. eCollection 2020.
4
Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.公众对数字健康研究知识库的态度:国际横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 29;23(10):e31294. doi: 10.2196/31294.
5
Factors influencing the reuse of reclaimed water as a management option to augment water supplies.影响再生水再利用作为增加水资源管理选择的因素。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Aug 18;190(9):531. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6905-y.
6
The European health data space: Too big to succeed?欧洲健康数据空间:太大而难以成功?
Health Policy. 2023 Sep;135:104861. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104861. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
7
Unlocking renewable energy potential: Overcoming knowledge sharing hurdles in rural EU regions on example of poland, sweden and france.释放可再生能源潜力:以波兰、瑞典和法国为例,克服欧盟农村地区的知识共享障碍。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 10;20(4):e0320965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320965. eCollection 2025.
8
Who tweets what about personalised medicine? Promises and concerns from Twitter discussions in Denmark.谁在推特上发布了关于个性化医疗的哪些内容?丹麦推特讨论中的承诺与担忧。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231169832. doi: 10.1177/20552076231169832. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Public willingness to participate in personalized health research and biobanking: A large-scale Swiss survey.公众参与个性化健康研究和生物库的意愿:一项大规模的瑞士调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249141. eCollection 2021.
10
European Health Information Portal: a one-stop shop for health information.欧洲健康信息门户:一站式健康信息服务。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i29-i34. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad172.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitude towards consent-free research use of personal medical data in the general German population.德国普通民众对个人医疗数据无同意使用研究的态度。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 11;10(6):e27933. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27933. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
2
Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.患者和公众对个人健康数据用于第三方或二次使用的意愿:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e50421. doi: 10.2196/50421.
3
Ethical and social reflections on the proposed European Health Data Space.关于拟议的欧洲健康数据空间的伦理和社会思考。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):498-505. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01543-9. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Public Preferences for Digital Health Data Sharing: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in 12 European Countries.公众对数字健康数据共享的偏好:12 个欧洲国家的离散选择实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e47066. doi: 10.2196/47066.
5
Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.
6
Who tweets what about personalised medicine? Promises and concerns from Twitter discussions in Denmark.谁在推特上发布了关于个性化医疗的哪些内容?丹麦推特讨论中的承诺与担忧。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231169832. doi: 10.1177/20552076231169832. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
7
Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment.公众对共享健康数据的偏好:离散选择实验
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 5;9(7):e29614. doi: 10.2196/29614.
8
Data authority: Public debate about personalized medicine in Denmark.数据来源:丹麦关于个性化医学的公共辩论。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jul;31(5):590-607. doi: 10.1177/09636625221080535. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Willingness to Share yet Maintain Influence: A Cross-Sectional Study on Attitudes in Sweden to the Use of Electronic Health Data.分享意愿与保持影响力:瑞典对电子健康数据使用态度的横断面研究
Public Health Ethics. 2020 Nov 27;14(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa035. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录进行生物医学研究中的伦理问题:系统评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):633-658. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10031-6. Epub 2021 Jun 19.