Arráez-Aybar Luis-A, Arias-Diaz Javier, Paredes Sergio D, Zuluaga-Arias Pilar, Chevalier Margarita, Salobrar-Garcia Elena, Collado Luis, Hurtado Olivia, Fernández-Mateos Pilar
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 7;10(6):e27283. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27283. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
Several curricular initiatives have been developed to improve the acquisition of research competencies by Health Science students.
To know how students self-perceived of whether their participation in the XIV National Research Congress for Undergraduate Students of Health Sciences had helped them in the acquisition of 36 research-related transferable competencies (TCs) common to Health Science degrees.
A survey design (Cronbach's alpha = 0.924), using a self-administered questionnaire, was conducted among undergraduate students who voluntarily participated in the Congress. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25 and Statgraphics 19. Statistical significance was considered for P < 0.05.
Eighty-one students from 12 Health Science degree programs responded. Key findings are presented in a structured manner, using a Likert-5 scale. Twenty-five of the competencies surveyed obtained an average ≥ 4 highlighting: "Critically evaluate and know how to use sources of clinical and biomedical information to obtain, organize, interpret, and communicate scientific and health information"; "To be able to formulate hypotheses, collect and critically evaluate information for problem solving, following the scientific method", "Critical analysis and research" and "Communicate effectively and clearly, orally and in writing with other professionals". Significance was found in 15 competencies. The development of the competencies "Teamwork", "Critical reasoning" and "Analysis and synthesis abilities" was considered to be of greater "personal utility" by the respondents.
Participation in this event contributed to the development of research-related TCs, critical analysis and information management and communication, especially in relation to learning the sources of clinical and biomedical information, to know, following the scientific method, how to formulate hypotheses that allow students to solve problems in their professional activity. The experience was significantly influenced by the respondents' year, the type of participation in the event and the gender of the students. Limitations and suggestions regarding future research are discussed to encourage further exploration of the topic.
已经开展了多项课程倡议,以提高健康科学专业学生的研究能力。
了解学生对参与第十四届健康科学专业本科生全国研究大会是否有助于他们获得健康科学学位共有的36项与研究相关的可转移能力(TCs)的自我认知。
采用问卷调查设计(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.924),对自愿参加大会的本科生进行了一项自填式问卷调查。使用SPSS 25和Statgraphics 19进行数据分析。P < 0.05时具有统计学意义。
来自12个健康科学学位课程的81名学生做出了回应。主要研究结果采用李克特5级量表进行结构化呈现。所调查的25项能力平均得分≥4,突出表现为:“批判性评估并知道如何使用临床和生物医学信息来源来获取、组织、解释和交流科学与健康信息”;“能够按照科学方法提出假设、收集并批判性评估信息以解决问题”、“批判性分析与研究”以及“与其他专业人员进行有效且清晰的口头和书面沟通”。在15项能力中发现了显著性差异。受访者认为“团队合作”、“批判性推理”和“分析与综合能力”的发展具有更大的“个人效用”。
参与该活动有助于与研究相关的可转移能力、批判性分析以及信息管理与交流的发展,特别是在学习临床和生物医学信息来源、按照科学方法了解如何提出假设以使学生能够解决其专业活动中的问题方面。受访者的年级、参与活动的类型以及学生的性别对该经历有显著影响。讨论了关于未来研究的局限性和建议,以鼓励对该主题进行进一步探索。