• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有终末期慢性健康状况的非癌症患者实际死亡地点的决定因素:一项范围综述

The determinants of actual place of death among noncancer patients with end-stage chronic health conditions: a scoping review.

作者信息

Ginggeaw Sangduan, LeBlanc Raeann

机构信息

Elaine Marieb College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 651 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

Elaine Marieb College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Mar 19;18:26323524241236964. doi: 10.1177/26323524241236964. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1177/26323524241236964
PMID:38510469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10953110/
Abstract

A home is a preferred place of death by most people. Nurses play a key role in supporting end-of-life home care, yet less is known about the factors that determine home as a place of death. This scoping review describes the percentage of actual places of death and determines social factors related to home as the place of death among noncancer patients with end-stage chronic health conditions. Inclusion criteria included (1) noncancer chronic illness conditions, (2) outcomes of place of death, and (3) factors that determine home as a place of death. Sources of evidence included PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, which were searched in May 2022, and additional searches from May 2022 to November 2023.The JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension were used. Twenty-eight studies were included in this analysis. The range of percentages is varied within the same place of death among the sample. Two major constructs that determine a home as a place of death were identified: preceding factors and social capital. The results suggest that the place of death among noncancer patients with end-stage chronic health conditions should be continued to be understood. Two constructs determined home as a place of death and are considered as a fundamental to increasing equal accessibility in the initiation of palliative care services to promote home death and meet end-of-life care goals.

摘要

对大多数人来说,家是首选的死亡地点。护士在支持临终家庭护理方面发挥着关键作用,但对于决定家作为死亡地点的因素却知之甚少。本综述描述了实际死亡地点的百分比,并确定了与家作为终末期慢性健康状况非癌症患者死亡地点相关的社会因素。纳入标准包括:(1)非癌症慢性疾病状况;(2)死亡地点的结果;(3)决定家作为死亡地点的因素。证据来源包括2022年5月检索的PubMed、CINAHL和科学网数据库,以及2022年5月至2023年11月的其他检索。使用了JBI综述指南(2020年)和系统评价与Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目。本分析纳入了28项研究。样本中同一死亡地点的百分比范围各不相同。确定家作为死亡地点的两个主要概念:前期因素和社会资本。结果表明,应继续了解终末期慢性健康状况非癌症患者的死亡地点。两个概念决定了家作为死亡地点,并被视为在启动姑息治疗服务时增加平等可及性以促进在家死亡和实现临终护理目标的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e52/10953110/6c0ab62f35a1/10.1177_26323524241236964-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e52/10953110/d336f3f31666/10.1177_26323524241236964-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e52/10953110/6c0ab62f35a1/10.1177_26323524241236964-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e52/10953110/d336f3f31666/10.1177_26323524241236964-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e52/10953110/6c0ab62f35a1/10.1177_26323524241236964-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The determinants of actual place of death among noncancer patients with end-stage chronic health conditions: a scoping review.患有终末期慢性健康状况的非癌症患者实际死亡地点的决定因素:一项范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Mar 19;18:26323524241236964. doi: 10.1177/26323524241236964. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Nursing care to patients who have the home as the preferred place of death: a scoping review.以家为首选死亡地点的患者的护理:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):1302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11757-8.
4
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
5
The determinants of home and nursing home death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.家庭和养老院死亡的决定因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 20;15:8. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0077-8.
6
Children's and parents' experiences of home care provided by hospital staff: A scoping review.医院工作人员提供的家庭护理:儿童和家长的体验:范围综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):3018-3032. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17109. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
7
End of life decisions and preference of place of death among geriatric and chronic disease patients: A scoping review.老年病和慢性病患者的临终决策及死亡地点偏好:一项范围综述
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Nov 24;4:100108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100108. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Place of death in rural palliative care: A systematic review.农村姑息治疗中的死亡地点:一项系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;30(8):745-63. doi: 10.1177/0269216316628779. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
The Determinants of Place of Death: An Evidence-Based Analysis.死亡地点的决定因素:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014 Dec 1;14(16):1-78. eCollection 2014.
10
Patient and Family Preferences About Place of End-of-Life Care and Death: An Umbrella Review.患者及其家属对临终关怀和死亡地点的偏好:伞式综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 May;67(5):e439-e452. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Place of death from dementia as an underlying cause during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a cross-sectional study from national death certificates.日本新冠疫情期间以痴呆症为根本死因的死亡地点:基于国家死亡证明的横断面研究
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Aug 28;17:26323524231193039. doi: 10.1177/26323524231193039. eCollection 2023.
2
Social Vulnerability and Location of Death in Heart Failure in the United States.美国心力衰竭患者的社会脆弱性与死亡地点。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jul;48(7):101689. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101689. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
3
Dying at Home Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019.
因2019冠状病毒病在家中死亡。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 25;9(9):ofac439. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac439. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Where Adults with Congenital Heart Disease Die: Insights from the CDC-WONDER Database.患有先天性心脏病的成年人的死亡地点:来自疾病控制与预防中心-WONDER数据库的见解。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101344. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101344. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
5
The Association Between Race and Place of Death Among Persons With Dementia.种族与痴呆症患者死亡地点之间的关联。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Sep;64(3):e109-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
The Revised Medical Care Act is associated with a decrease in hospital death for the total Japanese older adult population regardless of dementia status: An interrupted time series analysis.《修订版医疗护理法案》与日本所有老年人口(无论是否患有痴呆症)的医院死亡率下降有关:一项中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 3;17(3):e0264624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264624. eCollection 2022.
7
Determinants of Location of Death: A Secondary Analysis Utilizing Multinomial Logistic Regression.死亡地点的决定因素:利用多项逻辑回归进行的二次分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;39(12):1397-1402. doi: 10.1177/10499091221077883. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Site of death among individuals with and without dementia in 2016-2018.2016 - 2018年患有和未患痴呆症个体的死亡地点。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jun;70(6):1865-1867. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17704. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
9
Levels and Determinants of Place-Of-Death Congruence in Palliative Patients: A Systematic Review.姑息治疗患者死亡地点一致性的水平及决定因素:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 13;12:807869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807869. eCollection 2021.
10
End-of-Life Preferences in Older US Adults-Bridging the "What Matters" Chasm.美国老年人的临终偏好——弥合“重要之事”的差距
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142279. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42279.