Ho Patrick, Al-Chami Farouk, Caroline Mara, Gnall Eric, Bonn Joseph, Greenspon Lee
Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, United States of America.
Division of Internal Medicine, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, United States of America.
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Sep 2;34:100320. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100320. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Early data on use of catheter-directed therapies (CDT) for treatment of Intermediate or High-Risk pulmonary embolism (PE) show improvement in pulmonary artery systolic pressures (PAsP) and RV/LV ratios. Occasionally a paradoxical rise in PAsP was observed with CDT utilizing ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT). It is unclear whether this pattern is seen with CDT utilizing mechanical aspiration.
To investigate and compare the changes in PAsP between those who underwent CDT with USAT to those with mechanical aspiration.
A retrospective analysis of those diagnosed with Intermediate or High-Risk PE who underwent CDT using USAT or mechanical aspiration from 7/2013 to 3/2023. The primary outcome was comparison of PAsP changes between the two modalities. Secondary outcomes include length of stay, mortality, and bleeding complications.
A total of 142 patients were analyzed, of which 93 underwent USAT and 49 underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The mechanical thrombectomy group had significantly lower post-intervention PAsP than the USAT group (42.2 ± 13.4 mmHg vs 54.5 ± 15.2 mmHg, < 0.0001) and a greater adjusted mean reduction (-16.5 ± 2.7 vs. -7.7 ± 3.2 mmHg. p < 0.0001). A higher frequency of a paradoxical rise in PAsP was observed in the USAT group (22 % vs 4.1 %, < 0.001).
CDT utilizing mechanical thrombectomy was associated with lower post-interventional PAsP and greater mean negative change compared to USAT. Occasional paradoxical rises in PAsP were observed with both types of CDT, but they were more frequent with USAT. Hemodynamic monitoring should be considered after CDT.
We report a retrospective comparison of changes to pulmonary artery systolic pressures (PAsPs) between catheter-directed ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) and catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy in Intermediate and High-Risk pulmonary embolism. Those treated with mechanical thrombectomy compared to USAT had significantly lower post-interventional PAsP (42.2 ± 13.4 mmHg vs 54.5 ± 15.2 mmHg, < 0.0001) and a greater adjusted mean reduction (-16.2 ± 2.7 vs. -7.5 ± 3.2 mmHg, p < 0.0001). A paradoxical rise in PAsP was observed more frequently in the USAT group than the mechanical thrombectomy group (22 % vs 4.1 %, < 0.001).
关于导管直接治疗(CDT)用于治疗中高危肺栓塞(PE)的早期数据显示,肺动脉收缩压(PAsP)和右心室/左心室比值有所改善。偶尔会观察到,在使用超声辅助溶栓(USAT)的CDT治疗中,PAsP出现反常升高。目前尚不清楚在使用机械抽吸的CDT治疗中是否也会出现这种情况。
研究并比较接受USAT的CDT治疗者与接受机械抽吸的CDT治疗者之间PAsP的变化。
对2013年7月至2023年3月期间被诊断为中高危PE并接受USAT或机械抽吸的CDT治疗者进行回顾性分析。主要结局是比较两种治疗方式之间PAsP的变化。次要结局包括住院时间、死亡率和出血并发症。
共分析了142例患者,其中93例接受了USAT治疗,49例接受了机械血栓切除术。机械血栓切除术组干预后的PAsP显著低于USAT组(42.2±13.4mmHg对54.5±15.2mmHg,<0.0001),调整后的平均降低幅度更大(-16.5±2.7对-7.7±3.2mmHg,p<0.0001)。USAT组中观察到PAsP反常升高的频率更高(22%对4.1%,<0.001)。
与USAT相比,使用机械血栓切除术的CDT治疗后PAsP更低,平均负向变化更大。两种类型的CDT治疗均偶尔会观察到PAsP反常升高,但在USAT治疗中更频繁。CDT治疗后应考虑进行血流动力学监测。
我们报告了在中高危肺栓塞中,导管直接超声辅助溶栓(USAT)与导管直接机械血栓切除术之间肺动脉收缩压(PAsP)变化的回顾性比较。与接受USAT治疗的患者相比,接受机械血栓切除术治疗的患者干预后的PAsP显著更低(42.2±13.4mmHg对54.5±15.2mmHg,<0.0001),调整后的平均降低幅度更大(-16.2±2.7对-7.5±3.2mmHg,p<0.0001)。USAT组中观察到PAsP反常升高的频率高于机械血栓切除术组(22%对4.1%,<0.001)。