John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
University of Hawaii at Manoa, Office of Public Health Studies, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2365-2372. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05239-z. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Extended offset (EO) stems are commonly used in posterior approach (PA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), but usage rates and complications are not well studied with anterior approach (AA) THA. This study evaluated usage rates, radiographic outcomes and complications following AA THA between patients receiving EO stems and a matched cohort receiving standard offset (SO) stems.
This retrospective review evaluated 1515 consecutive AA THA performed between 2014 and 2021. The recent 100 EO were included in radiographic and complication analysis and were matched to 100 SO stems based on stem size, procedure (unilateral/bilateral), sex, body mass index (BMI), and age. Data collection included patient demographics; pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements of leg length difference (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHOD); and complications within 1 year. Independent t-tests and Chi-squared analyses compared EO and SO groups.
EO was utilized in 8% of all AA THA. Despite matching procedures, the distribution of racial groups was different between EO and SO groups, respectively: Caucasian (75% vs. 43%), Asian (12% vs. 35%), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) (9% vs. 13%), and other (4% vs. 9%) (p < 0.001). No fractures, dislocations, or revisions occurred within 1 year after surgery in either group. One deep infection was noted in the SO group. The proportions of patients following surgery who had a GHOD < 6 mm (76% vs. 82%; p = 0.193) and LLD < 6 mm (81% vs. 86%; p = 0.223) were not significantly different between EO and SO groups, respectively.
Prioritizing hip symmetry over stability results in a high proportion of patients achieving hip symmetry without high usage of EO stems in AA THA. Furthermore, low use of EO stems did not result in increased dislocations. Due to racial anatomical differences, Caucasian patients required EO stems to achieve hip symmetry more frequently than Asian and NHPI patients.
在后路(PA)全髋关节置换术(THA)中,常使用延长偏心距(EO)柄,但在经前路(AA)THA 中,EO 柄的使用情况和相关并发症尚未得到充分研究。本研究评估了接受 EO 柄和匹配的接受标准偏心距(SO)柄的患者在 AA-THA 后的使用情况、影像学结果和并发症。
本回顾性研究评估了 2014 年至 2021 年间进行的 1515 例连续 AA-THA。对最近的 100 例 EO 进行了影像学和并发症分析,并根据柄的大小、手术(单侧/双侧)、性别、体质量指数(BMI)和年龄与 100 例 SO 进行了匹配。数据收集包括患者的人口统计学资料;术前和术后下肢长度差异(LLD)和整体髋关节偏心距差异(GHOD)的影像学测量值;以及 1 年内的并发症。独立 t 检验和卡方检验比较了 EO 和 SO 组。
EO 在所有 AA-THA 中的使用率为 8%。尽管进行了匹配,但 EO 和 SO 组的种族分布不同:白种人(75% vs. 43%)、亚洲人(12% vs. 35%)、原住民夏威夷/太平洋岛民(9% vs. 13%)和其他(4% vs. 9%)(p<0.001)。两组术后 1 年内均无骨折、脱位或翻修。SO 组发生 1 例深部感染。术后 GHOD<6mm 的患者比例(76% vs. 82%;p=0.193)和 LLD<6mm 的患者比例(81% vs. 86%;p=0.223)在 EO 和 SO 组之间无显著差异。
优先考虑髋关节对称性而不是稳定性会导致很大一部分患者在 AA-THA 中实现髋关节对称性,而无需大量使用 EO 柄。此外,EO 柄的低使用率并未导致脱位增加。由于种族解剖学差异,白种人患者比亚洲人和原住民夏威夷/太平洋岛民患者更频繁地需要 EO 柄才能实现髋关节对称性。