• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术中经直接前路和后路入路的术中并发症及早期重返手术室情况。外科医生度过学习曲线后的机构经验。

Intraoperative Complications and Early Return to the Operating Room in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches. An Institutional Experience of Surgeons After Their Learning Curve.

作者信息

Bendich Ilya, Landy David C, Do Huong, Krell Ethan, Diane Alioune, Boettner Friedrich, Rodriguez Jose, Alexiades Michael, Gonzalez Della Valle Alejandro

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Rerplacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2829-2835. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.046
PMID:33865647
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proponents of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) claim a faster recovery, whereas critics claim an increased risk of early femoral complications. This study analyzed intraoperative and postoperative complications requiring reoperation within one year after THA through the DAA and posterior approach (PA).

METHODS

A total of 2348 elective, unilateral DAA THAs in patients with osteoarthritis performed between 2016 and 2019 were matched 1:1 for age (±5 years), gender, body mass index (±5), and femoral fixation with 2348 patients who underwent PA THA during the same period. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used. Odds ratios were reported for the occurrence of intraoperative femoral fracture, postoperative femoral fracture, infection, dislocation, and other etiologies requiring reoperation within one year.

RESULTS

Intraoperative femoral fracture occurred in 12 DAA (0.5%) and 14 PA (0.6%) patients. Twenty-five patients (1.06%) in the DAA and 28 (1.19%) in the PA group underwent reoperation within the first year. Reoperations were due to periprosthetic fracture (40%), infection (28%), dislocation (23%), and other (9%). Regression analysis revealed no difference in intraoperative femoral fracture (odds ratio (OR): 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-1.86, P = .69), postoperative femoral fracture (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.47-2.60, P = .83), infection (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.53-5.23, P = .44), or reoperation within one year for other reasons (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.25-9.00, P = .65). DAA had fewer dislocations requiring reoperation (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.91, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

This comparative study did not find differences in intraoperative or postoperative fracture or infection between DAA and PA. DAA was associated with a lower likelihood of reoperation for dislocation within one year of surgery.

摘要

背景

全髋关节置换术(THA)直接前路入路(DAA)的支持者称其恢复更快,而批评者则称早期股骨并发症风险增加。本研究分析了通过DAA和后路入路(PA)进行THA术后一年内需要再次手术的术中及术后并发症。

方法

对2016年至2019年间进行的2348例骨关节炎患者的择期单侧DAA THA,按照年龄(±5岁)、性别、体重指数(±5)和股骨固定情况与同期进行PA THA的2348例患者进行1:1匹配。采用混合效应逻辑回归分析。报告了术中股骨骨折、术后股骨骨折、感染、脱位及其他需要在一年内再次手术的病因的比值比。

结果

12例(0.5%)DAA患者和14例(0.6%)PA患者发生术中股骨骨折。DAA组25例(1.06%)患者和PA组28例(1.19%)患者在第一年接受了再次手术。再次手术原因包括假体周围骨折(40%)、感染(28%)、脱位(23%)和其他(9%)。回归分析显示,术中股骨骨折(比值比(OR):0.86,95%置信区间(CI):0.40 - 1.86,P = 0.69)、术后股骨骨折(OR:1.10,95% CI:0.47 - 2.60,P = 0.83)、感染(OR:1.50,95% CI:0.53 - 5.23,P = 0.44)或因其他原因在一年内再次手术(OR:1.50,95% CI:0.25 - 9.00,P = 0.65)方面无差异。DAA组需要再次手术的脱位较少(OR:0.20,95% CI:0.04 - 0.91,P = 0.02)。

结论

这项比较研究未发现DAA和PA在术中或术后骨折或感染方面存在差异。DAA与术后一年内因脱位而再次手术的可能性较低有关。

相似文献

1
Intraoperative Complications and Early Return to the Operating Room in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches. An Institutional Experience of Surgeons After Their Learning Curve.全髋关节置换术中经直接前路和后路入路的术中并发症及早期重返手术室情况。外科医生度过学习曲线后的机构经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2829-2835. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Comparisons between Direct Anterior Approach and Lateral Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Postoperative Orthopaedic Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接前入路与外侧入路初次全髋关节置换术后骨科并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Aug;13(6):1707-1720. doi: 10.1111/os.13101. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Reduced 1-Year Mortality and Surgical Complications After Femoral Neck Fracture.直接前入路全髋关节置换术与股骨颈骨折后 1 年死亡率和手术并发症的降低相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Nov;38(11):2347-2354.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.045. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
Total Hip Arthroplasty: Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in the First Year of Practice.全髋关节置换术:在实践的第一年,直接前入路与后入路的比较。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):127-136.
5
Robotic Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation When Compared to Manual Techniques.与手动技术相比,机器人辅助后路全髋关节置换术的脱位翻修风险更低。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1124-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.085. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
6
Reasons for Failure of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Direct Anterior Approach.经直接前方入路进行初次全髋关节置换术失败的原因。
Orthopedics. 2020 Jul 1;43(4):239-244. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200521-01. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
7
A Comparison of Risk of Dislocation and Cause-Specific Revision Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approach Following Elective Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.直接前侧入路与后侧入路在全髋关节置换术后非骨水泥固定假体的脱位风险和特定原因翻修比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1651-1657. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.033. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Comparison Between the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Femoral Neck Fracture.直接前入路与后入路全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):41-48. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001883.
9
The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome.直接前入路全髋关节置换术在股骨颈骨折中的作用及影响疗效的因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
10
Direct Anterior Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Lowers the Risk of Dislocation Compared to the Posterior Approach: A Single Institution Experience.直接前入路与后入路初次全髋关节置换术的脱位风险比较:单中心经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar;37(3):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Total elbow and hip arthroplasties confer greater short-term risk of postoperative complications: a matched cohort analysis of the five major joint arthroplasties.全肘关节和髋关节置换术术后短期并发症风险更高:一项对五种主要关节置换术的配对队列分析。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025 Mar 2;17:129554. doi: 10.52965/001c.129554. eCollection 2025.
2
Should we be concerned when the anterior approach to the hip goes accidentally medial? A retrospective study.当髋关节前路意外进入内侧时,我们是否应该担心?一项回顾性研究。
Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep 1;6(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00269-9.
3
Extended offset stems are infrequently required in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and low usage does not compromise stability.
在前侧入路全髋关节置换术中,通常不需要延长的股骨头颈截骨,并且低使用率不会影响稳定性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2365-2372. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05239-z. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
Clinical outcomes of DAA and related techniques in hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术中直接前路入路(DAA)及相关技术的临床疗效。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Sep 1;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00198-z.
5
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Early Complications Between a Direct Anterior Approach or Posterolateral Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.同期双侧全髋关节置换术中直接前路与后外侧入路的围手术期结果及早期并发症比较:一项回顾性研究
HSS J. 2023 May;19(2):172-179. doi: 10.1177/15563316221145688. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
6
Differences in Infection Rates by Surgical Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty and Patient Sex: A Systematic Review.全髋关节置换术手术入路与患者性别对感染率的影响差异:系统评价。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):60-65.
7
Direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: How to reduce complications - A 10-years single center experience and literature review.直接前路髋关节置换术:如何减少并发症——一项10年单中心经验及文献综述
World J Orthop. 2022 Apr 18;13(4):388-399. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i4.388.