• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在移植中创建合成人群:一种贝叶斯方法,可实现无需重新抽样的模拟。

Creating synthetic populations in transplantation: A Bayesian approach enabling simulation without registry re-sampling.

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.

Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0296839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296839. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0296839
PMID:38512928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10956776/
Abstract

Computer simulation has played a pivotal role in analyzing alternative organ allocation strategies in transplantation. The current approach to producing cohorts of organ donors and candidates for individual-level simulation requires directly re-sampling retrospective data from a transplant registry. This historical data may reflect outmoded policies and practices as well as systemic inequities in candidate listing, limiting contemporary applicability of simulation results. We describe the development of an alternative approach for generating synthetic donors and candidates using hierarchical Bayesian network probability models. We developed two Bayesian networks to model dependencies among 10 donor and 36 candidate characteristics relevant to waitlist survival, donor-candidate matching, and post-transplant survival. We estimated parameters for each model using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data. For 100 donor and 100 candidate synthetic populations generated, proportions for each categorical donor or candidate attribute, respectively, fell within one percentage point of observed values; the interquartile ranges (IQRs) of each continuous variable contained the corresponding SRTR observed median. Comparisons of synthetic to observed stratified distributions demonstrated the ability of the method to capture complex joint variability among multiple characteristics. We also demonstrated how changing two upstream population parameters can exert cascading effects on multiple relevant clinical variables in a synthetic population. Generating synthetic donor and candidate populations in transplant simulation may help overcome critical limitations related to the re-sampling of historical data, allowing developers and decision makers to customize the parameters of these populations to reflect realistic or hypothetical future states.

摘要

计算机模拟在分析移植中的替代器官分配策略方面发挥了关键作用。目前,产生器官供体和个体模拟候选人群的方法需要直接从移植登记处重新抽样回顾性数据。这些历史数据可能反映了过时的政策和做法,以及候选名单编制方面的系统性不平等,从而限制了模拟结果的当代适用性。我们描述了一种使用层次贝叶斯网络概率模型生成合成供体和候选者的替代方法。我们开发了两个贝叶斯网络来模拟与候补名单生存、供体-候选者匹配和移植后生存相关的 10 个供体和 36 个候选者特征之间的依赖关系。我们使用 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 数据为每个模型估计参数。对于生成的 100 个供体和 100 个候选者合成人群,每个分类供体或候选者属性的比例分别在观察值的一个百分点内;每个连续变量的四分位间距 (IQR) 包含相应的 SRTR 观察中位数。对合成和观察分层分布的比较表明,该方法能够捕捉多个特征之间复杂的联合变异性。我们还展示了如何改变两个上游人群参数如何对合成人群中的多个相关临床变量产生级联效应。在移植模拟中生成合成供体和候选者人群可能有助于克服与重新抽样历史数据相关的关键限制,从而使开发人员和决策者能够定制这些人群的参数,以反映现实或假设的未来状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/6cb06918e9ac/pone.0296839.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/4c79cb85f196/pone.0296839.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/d24ef72938e3/pone.0296839.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/6cb06918e9ac/pone.0296839.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/4c79cb85f196/pone.0296839.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/d24ef72938e3/pone.0296839.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeaa/10956776/6cb06918e9ac/pone.0296839.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Creating synthetic populations in transplantation: A Bayesian approach enabling simulation without registry re-sampling.在移植中创建合成人群:一种贝叶斯方法,可实现无需重新抽样的模拟。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0296839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296839. eCollection 2024.
2
Using Linked Health Service Data in Multimodal Modeling of Kidney Transplant Waitlist Outcomes: Protocol for the Maximizing Organ Donor Utility Systemwide (MODUS) Study.在肾移植等待名单结果的多模态建模中使用关联健康服务数据:全系统最大化器官捐赠者效用系统(MODUS)研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 29;14:e67588. doi: 10.2196/67588.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
The real unmet need: A multifactorial approach for identifying sensitized kidney candidates with low access to transplant.真正未满足的需求:一种多因素方法,用于确定低移植机会的致敏肾脏候选者。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14946. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14946. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation for Older Transplant Candidates: A New Microsimulation Model for Determining Risks and Benefits.已故供体肾移植在老年移植受者中的应用:一种用于确定风险和获益的新的微观模拟模型。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Jul;43(5):576-586. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231172169. Epub 2023 May 12.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.性别作为肾移植后同种异体移植及患者相关预后的预测因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD014966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014966.pub2.
8
The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.接受透析治疗并等待已故捐赠者肾脏移植的成年人的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):169-211. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1973.
9
Racial-ethnic differences in liver transplant waitlist outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before and after recent changes to allocation policy.种族和民族差异在肝癌患者肝移植候补名单结果中的作用:在分配政策最近改变前后。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jun;38(6):e15365. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15365.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A supply-based scoring approach to account for biological disadvantages in accessing lung transplant.一种基于供应情况的评分方法,用于考量肺移植获取过程中的生物学劣势。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Feb;44(2):193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.022. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
A modular simulation framework for organ allocation.器官分配的模块化模拟框架。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Aug;43(8):1326-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.04.063. Epub 2024 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A new method for classifying prognostic risk factors in lung transplant candidates.一种用于分类肺移植候选者预后风险因素的新方法。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Nov;42(11):1569-1577. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report: Lung.美国器官获取与移植网络/器官分配与共享联合网络 2021 年年度数据报告:肺。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Feb;23(2 Suppl 1):S379-S442. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.02.009.
3
Transplant Center Websites: Yet Another Barrier to Equitable Care?移植中心网站:公平医疗的又一障碍?
Am J Transplant. 2023 Mar;23(3):305-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Reducing Racial Disparities in Access to Transplant in the United States: One Step at a Time.减少美国器官移植获取方面的种族差异:一步一个脚印。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Oct;17(10):1439-1441. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09590822. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-ninth adult lung transplantation report-2022; focus on lung transplant recipients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.国际心肺移植学会国际胸科器官移植登记处:2022年第39份成人肺移植报告;聚焦慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺移植受者
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Oct;41(10):1335-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Expected effect of the lung Composite Allocation Score system on US lung transplantation.肺综合分配评分系统对美国肺移植的预期效果。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec;22(12):2971-2980. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17160. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Lung.OPTN/SRTR 2020 年度数据报告:肺。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22 Suppl 2:438-518. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16991.
8
Waiting List Dynamics and Lung Transplantation Outcomes After Introduction of the Lung Allocation Score in The Netherlands.荷兰引入肺分配评分后的等待名单动态变化及肺移植结果
Transplant Direct. 2021 Sep 7;7(10):e760. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001205. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
New Kidney and Pancreas Allocation Policy: Moving to a Circle as the First Unit of Allocation.新的肾脏和胰腺分配政策:转向以循环作为首个分配单位
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jul;32(7):1546-1550. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020121679. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Implementing a Height-Based Rule for the Allocation of Pediatric Donor Livers to Adults: A Liver Simulated Allocation Model Study.实施基于身高的儿科供肝分配给成人的规则:一项肝脏模拟分配模型研究。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Jul;27(7):1058-1060. doi: 10.1002/lt.25986. Epub 2021 Feb 17.