Suppr超能文献

健康教练干预,辅以或不辅以运动伙伴支持,以增加慢性腰痛患者的身体活动量,与常规护理相比:一项可行性和初步随机对照试验。

Health coaching intervention with or without the support of an exercise buddy to increase physical activity of people with chronic low back pain compared to usual care: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Jun;71:102941. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102941. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exercise buddies (people to exercise together with) might support people with low back pain (LBP) to become active. However, involving buddies in randomised controlled trials (RCT) might challenge recruitment, data collection and follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the feasibility of the intervention, recruitment and data collection approaches and potential effects of a health coaching intervention (focused on physical activity) with or without exercise buddies' support on physical activity of people with chronic LBP versus usual discharge care.

DESIGN

Feasibility and pilot RCT.

METHODS

Adults (n = 30) discharged from LBP treatment were randomised to the Buddy-Assisted (health coaching intervention with exercise buddy's support), Individual-Only (health coaching only), or usual care groups. Data were collected at baseline, three and six months. The feasibility of trial's procedures was assessed through recruitment rate (acceptable if >70%), data completion rate (acceptable if ≤ 20% missing data), and follow-up rate (successful if ≥ 85%). The intervention's acceptability was assessed via feedback questionnaires. Preliminary effects on physical activity and other outcomes were also explored.

RESULTS

Recruitment and baseline data completion were acceptable. However, data collection and follow-up rates post-randomisation were not. 85% of the Buddy-Assisted Group believed the buddies helped them to increase physical activity and would recommend the intervention. 70% of the Individual-Only and Control groups believed exercise buddies would help them to become further active.

CONCLUSION

The data collection and follow-up approaches were not successful and need amending before a large-scale RCT. Nonetheless, the buddy-assisted intervention was well-accepted. A future RCT will focus on differences in clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12620001118998).

摘要

背景

运动伙伴(一起运动的人)可以帮助腰痛(LBP)患者变得活跃。然而,在随机对照试验(RCT)中纳入伙伴可能会对招募、数据收集和随访造成挑战。

目的

探索健康教练干预(专注于身体活动)联合或不联合运动伙伴支持对慢性 LBP 患者身体活动的干预效果、招募和数据收集方法的可行性。

设计

可行性和初步 RCT。

方法

从 LBP 治疗中出院的成年人(n=30)被随机分配到伙伴辅助组(健康教练干预+运动伙伴支持)、个体仅组(仅健康教练)或常规护理组。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时收集数据。通过招募率(可接受率>70%)、数据完成率(可接受率≤20%缺失数据)和随访率(成功率≥85%)评估试验程序的可行性。通过反馈问卷评估干预的可接受性。还探讨了初步对身体活动和其他结果的影响。

结果

招募和基线数据完成情况是可以接受的。然而,随机分组后的数据收集和随访率并不理想。85%的伙伴辅助组认为伙伴帮助他们增加了身体活动,并会推荐该干预措施。70%的个体仅组和对照组认为运动伙伴会帮助他们进一步活跃。

结论

数据收集和随访方法并不成功,需要在大规模 RCT 之前进行修改。尽管如此,伙伴辅助干预措施还是很受欢迎的。未来的 RCT 将重点关注临床结局的差异。

试验注册

该研究在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12620001118998)注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验