Effect of proactive combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis on technique survival and mortality.

PURPOSE

Clinically relevant evidence for the timing of starting combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis remains scarce. We retrospectively examined whether combination therapy during the induction phase of dialysis prolongs peritoneal dialysis duration.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes 160 patients who underwent combination therapy from 20 dialysis facilities. Four groups were categorized: combination at peritoneal dialysis induction (n = 12, Proactive combination group), and combination following peritoneal dialysis durations of < 2 years (n = 65), 2-5 years (n = 70), or > 5 years (n = 13). Differences in technique survival of dialysis, mortality, and hospitalization due to cardiovascular events in the groups were observed.

RESULTS

The Proactive combination group had the longer mean duration of combination therapy (3.18 years) comparing to that of combination therapy following peritoneal dialysis (1.45 years), but total peritoneal dialysis duration was shorter than in control groups (4.02 years). Of the 160 cases in the entire cohort, there were 8 deaths, 18 ischemic heart disease hospitalizations, and 18 stroke hospitalizations. The Proactive group had lower crude mortality rate (0/12 cases, 0.0%) and crude hospitalization rate for ischemic heart disease (1/11, 8.3%) than the other groups. However, this cohort study did not have enough statistical power to adjust for patients' background, and we were unable to fully examine the differences in such clinical outcomes by the timing of initiation of combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Use of combination therapy in the induction phase might prolong the duration of combination therapy, but is not necessarily effective for prolonging peritoneal dialysis technique survival.