State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Jul;51(7):1166-1174. doi: 10.1111/joor.13688. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
The objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between types of disc displacement (DD) diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the risk (presence or absence) and severity of condylar erosion (CE) graded using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in adult Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients.
A total of 353 TMD patients (283 females, 70 males) underwent MRI scans to categorise DD as normal (NA), anterior displacement with reduction (ADDR), or anterior displacement without reduction (ADDNR). CE severity was graded on a scale of 0-3 (absence, mild, moderate or severe) using CBCT. To establish the plausibility and cut-off points for CE diagnosis, the severity of CE was then further divided into three classifications: Grade 0 versus 1 + 2 + 3; Grades 0 + 1 versus 2 + 3; Grades 0 + 1 + 2 versus 3. Logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for age, gender and joint correlation.
ADDNR significantly increased the risk of CE compared with NA (OR = 10.04, 95% CI: [6.41, 15.73]) and showed a significant increase in CE severity across all classifications (ORs = 10.04-18.95). The effects of ADDNR were significant in both genders (p < .001) and had a greater impact in females. ADDR was predominantly associated with mild CE.
ADDNR significantly increased the risk and severity of CE independent of gender when compared to NA, whereas ADDR was mainly associated with mild CE. Slight cortical discontinuity may represent a subclinical diagnosis requiring further investigation.
本研究旨在探讨磁共振成像(MRI)诊断的盘移位(DD)类型与成人颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者锥形束 CT(CBCT)分级的髁突侵蚀(CE)风险(有无)和严重程度之间的关系。
共有 353 名 TMD 患者(283 名女性,70 名男性)接受 MRI 扫描,将 DD 分类为正常(NA)、前移位伴复位(ADDR)或前移位不伴复位(ADDNR)。使用 CBCT 将 CE 严重程度分为 0-3 级(无、轻度、中度或重度)。为了确定 CE 诊断的合理性和临界点,CE 严重程度进一步分为 3 个分类:0 级与 1+2+3 级;0 级与 2+3 级;0 级+1 级+2 级与 3 级。进行逻辑回归分析,调整年龄、性别和关节相关性。
与 NA 相比,ADDNR 显著增加了 CE 的风险(OR=10.04,95%CI:[6.41,15.73]),并在所有分类中均显示出 CE 严重程度的显著增加(ORs=10.04-18.95)。ADDNR 的影响在两性中均显著(p<.001),在女性中影响更大。ADDR 主要与轻度 CE 相关。
与 NA 相比,ADDNR 显著增加了 CE 的风险和严重程度,而 ADDR 主要与轻度 CE 相关。轻微的皮质连续性中断可能代表需要进一步研究的亚临床诊断。