California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jun;242:105896. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105896. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
Decisions about how to divide resources have profound social and practical consequences. Do explanations regarding the source of existing inequalities influence how children and adults allocate new resources? When 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 201) learned that inequalities were caused by structural forces (stable external constraints affecting access to resources) as opposed to internal forces (effort), they rectified inequalities, overriding previously documented tendencies to perpetuate inequality or divide resources equally. Adults (N = 201) were more likely than children to rectify inequality spontaneously; this was further strengthened by a structural explanation but reversed by an effort-based explanation. Allocation behaviors were mirrored in judgments of which allocation choices by others were appropriate. These findings reveal how explanations powerfully guide social reasoning and action from childhood through adulthood.
关于如何分配资源的决策具有深远的社会和实际影响。关于现有不平等现象根源的解释是否会影响儿童和成人分配新资源的方式?当 3 至 6 岁的儿童(N=201)了解到不平等是由结构性力量(影响资源获取的稳定外部限制)造成的,而不是由内部力量(努力)造成的时,他们纠正了不平等现象,推翻了之前记录的使不平等现象永久化或平均分配资源的倾向。成年人(N=201)比儿童更有可能自发地纠正不平等现象;这一现象因结构性解释而得到进一步加强,但因基于努力的解释而被逆转。分配行为反映在对他人分配选择的判断上,这些选择是合适的。这些发现揭示了解释是如何从儿童时期到成年时期有力地指导社会推理和行动的。