Suppr超能文献

开发并验证一种新的评分系统,用于预测稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者行非心脏手术围术期主要不良心血管事件。

Development and validation of a novel score for predicting perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Department of Cardiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu 322000, China.

Department of Information Technology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 15;405:131982. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131982. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A model developed specifically for stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) patients to predict perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) has not been previously reported.

METHODS

The derivation cohort consisted of 5780 patients with SCAD undergoing noncardiac surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from January 1, 2013 until May 31, 2021. The validation cohort consisted of 2677 similar patients from June 1, 2021 to May 31, 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of MACEs (death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke) intraoperatively or during hospitalization postoperatively.

RESULTS

Six predictors, including Creatinine >90 μmol/L, Hemoglobin <110 g/L, Albumin <40 g/L, Leukocyte >10 ×10/L, high-risk Surgery (general abdominal or vascular), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (III or IV), were selected in the final model (CHALSA score). Each patient was assigned a CHALSA score of 0, 1, 2, 3, or > 3 according to the number of predictors present. The incidence of perioperative MACEs increased steadily across the CHALSA score groups in both the derivation (0.5%, 1.4%, 2.9%, 6.8%, and 23.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) and validation (0.3%, 1.5%, 4.1%, 9.2%, and 29.2%, respectively; p < 0.001) cohorts. The CHALSA score had a higher discriminatory ability than the revised cardiac risk index (C statistic: 0.827 vs. 0.695 in the validation dataset; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The CHALSA score showed good validity in an external dataset and will be a valuable bedside tool to guide the perioperative management of patients with SCAD undergoing noncardiac surgery.

摘要

背景

目前尚未报道专门针对稳定性冠状动脉疾病(SCAD)患者的预测围手术期主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的模型。

方法

该研究的推导队列包括 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日期间在浙江大学医学院第一附属医院接受非心脏手术的 5780 例 SCAD 患者。验证队列包括 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间的 2677 例类似患者。主要结局是围手术期或术后住院期间发生的 MACE(死亡、复苏性心脏骤停、心肌梗死、心力衰竭和中风)的复合事件。

结果

最终模型(CHALSA 评分)中选择了 6 个预测因素,包括肌酐>90μmol/L、血红蛋白<110g/L、白蛋白<40g/L、白细胞>10×10/L、高危手术(普通腹部或血管)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级(III 或 IV 级)。根据存在的预测因素数量,每位患者被分配 0、1、2、3 或>3 分的 CHALSA 评分。在推导队列(分别为 0.5%、1.4%、2.9%、6.8%和 23.4%;p<0.001)和验证队列(分别为 0.3%、1.5%、4.1%、9.2%和 29.2%;p<0.001)中,围手术期 MACE 的发生率随着 CHALSA 评分组的增加而稳步上升。CHALSA 评分的判别能力高于修正后的心脏风险指数(验证数据集中的 C 统计量:0.827 与 0.695;p<0.001)。

结论

CHALSA 评分在外数据集表现出良好的有效性,将成为指导 SCAD 患者非心脏手术围手术期管理的有价值的床边工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验