From the Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (T.W., N.R.S., Y.X., J.S.B.), New York University School of Medicine.
Department of Surgery (J.S.B.), New York University School of Medicine.
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2002-2006. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024995. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
Background and Purpose- Perioperative stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional cardiovascular risk scores have not been compared to predict acute stroke after noncardiac surgery. Methods- Patients undergoing noncardiac surgery between 2009 and 2010 were identified from the US National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n=540 717). Patients were prospectively followed for 30 days postoperatively for the primary outcome of stroke. Established cardiovascular and perioperative risk scores (CHADS, CHADS-VASc, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, Mashour et al risk score, Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score, and National Quality Improvement Project American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator) were assessed to predict perioperative stroke. Results- Stroke occurred in the perioperative period of 1474 noncardiac surgeries (0.27%). Patients with perioperative stroke were older, more frequently male, had lower body mass index, and were more likely to have undergone vascular surgery or neurosurgery than patients without stroke (P<0.001 for each comparison). All risk prediction models were associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke (C statistic [AUC] range, 0.743-0.836). The Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score (AUC, 0.833) and American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator (AUC, 0.836) had the most favorable test characteristics and a greater ability to discriminate perioperative stroke when compared with Revised Cardiac Risk Index, CHADS, CHADS-VASc, and Mashour risk scores (P for comparison, <0.001; Delong). Risk scores did not provide consistent discriminative ability across surgery types and were least predictive in vascular surgery (AUC range, 0.588-0.672). Conclusions- The Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest risk score and American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator surgical risk scores provide excellent risk discrimination for perioperative stroke in most patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stroke prediction was less optimal in patients undergoing vascular surgery.
背景与目的-围手术期卒中与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。传统的心血管风险评分尚未被比较以预测非心脏手术后的急性卒中。方法-从美国国家手术质量改进计划(National Surgical Quality Improvement Program,NSQIP)中确定了 2009 年至 2010 年间接受非心脏手术的患者(n=540717)。前瞻性随访患者术后 30 天内的主要结局为卒中。评估了既定的心血管和围手术期风险评分(CHADS、CHADS-VASc、修订后的心脏风险指数、Mashour 等风险评分、心肌梗死或心搏骤停风险评分以及国家质量改进计划美国外科医师学会手术风险计算器)以预测围手术期卒中。结果-1474 例非心脏手术中有 1474 例(0.27%)在围手术期发生卒中。围手术期卒中患者年龄较大,男性居多,体重指数较低,更有可能接受血管手术或神经外科手术,而非卒中患者(每项比较均 P<0.001)。所有风险预测模型均与围手术期卒中风险增加相关(C 统计量[AUC]范围,0.743-0.836)。心肌梗死或心搏骤停风险评分(AUC,0.833)和美国外科医师学会手术风险计算器(AUC,0.836)与修订后的心脏风险指数、CHADS、CHADS-VASc 和 Mashour 风险评分相比,具有最佳的检验特征和更大的区分围手术期卒中的能力(P<0.001;Delong)。风险评分在不同手术类型之间并未提供一致的区分能力,在血管手术中预测能力最低(AUC 范围,0.588-0.672)。结论-心肌梗死或心搏骤停风险评分和美国外科医师学会手术风险计算器手术风险评分在大多数接受非心脏手术的患者中为围手术期卒中提供了出色的风险区分能力。在接受血管手术的患者中,卒中预测效果较差。