School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China.
The First Hospital of Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Changchun 130021, China.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jun;154:104755. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104755. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
The aims of this systematic review were to explore the pooled prevalence of multidimensional frailty assessed by the Tilburg Frailty Indicator among community-dwelling older adults.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and three Chinese databases. Two independent researchers selected the literatures, extracted the data and evaluated the quality. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 16.0.
There were 66 studies with a total of 40,597 individuals that were eligible for the meta-analysis. Data from the meta-analysis revealed the pooled prevalence of 42 % for multidimensional frailty (95 % CI: 38 %-45 %, I = 98.9 %, T = 0.024, p < 0.001). Among the six studies that provided data for different age groups, the results demonstrated an increasing trend in the prevalence of multidimensional frailty with advancing age. The results of gender-stratified analysis proved that the pooled prevalence of multidimensional frailty in women (45 %, 95 % CI: 39 %-51 %, p < 0.001) was higher than that in men (33 %, 95 % CI: 28 %-39 %, p < 0.001). Based on different education levels, the prevalence of multidimensional frailty is highest in the primary elementary or illiterate group (41 %, 95 % CI: 30 %-52 %, p < 0.001). According to different marital status types, the pooled prevalence of multidimensional frailty in the married group was significantly lower (36 %, 95 % CI: 28 %-43 %) than that in the unmarried, divorced or widowed group (51 %, 95 % CI: 37 %-65 %).
Through a comprehensive review, we identified that 42 % of elderly individuals living in communities exhibit multidimensional frailty, indicating that multidimensional frailty is relatively common in this population. Stratified analysis revealed that advanced age, female gender, lower education level and unmarried status were associated with higher rates of multidimensional frailty.
本系统评价旨在探讨使用蒂尔堡虚弱指标评估的多维虚弱在社区居住的老年人中的总患病率。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
全面检索了多个数据库,包括 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和三个中文数据库。两名独立研究人员选择文献、提取数据并评估质量。所有统计分析均使用 STATA 版本 16.0 进行。
有 66 项研究共纳入 40597 名符合条件的个体进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析数据显示,多维虚弱的总患病率为 42%(95%CI:38%-45%,I=98.9%,T=0.024,p<0.001)。在提供不同年龄组数据的 6 项研究中,结果表明多维虚弱的患病率随着年龄的增长呈上升趋势。性别分层分析的结果证明,女性多维虚弱的总患病率(45%,95%CI:39%-51%,p<0.001)高于男性(33%,95%CI:28%-39%,p<0.001)。根据不同的教育水平,多维虚弱的患病率在小学或文盲组最高(41%,95%CI:30%-52%,p<0.001)。根据不同的婚姻状况类型,已婚组多维虚弱的总患病率(36%,95%CI:28%-43%)明显低于未婚、离婚或丧偶组(51%,95%CI:37%-65%)。
通过全面审查,我们发现 42%的社区居住老年人存在多维虚弱,表明社区老年人中多维虚弱较为常见。分层分析显示,年龄较大、女性、较低的教育水平和未婚状态与多维虚弱的发生率较高相关。