Neveu Maëlle, Schwartz Cédric, Rousselle Laurence
Research Unit for a Life-Course Perspective on Health & Education, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium; National Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS), B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Laboratory of Movement Analysis (LAM)-Motion Lab, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jul;243:105909. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105909. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
A limited number of studies have attempted to understand how motor deficits affect numerical abilities in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). The purpose of this study was to explore the functionality of finger-counting (FC) in children with DCD. The participants, 15 children with DCD and 15 typically developing (TD) children matched on school level and fluid reasoning abilities, were asked to use FC to solve an ordinal task with high working memory (WM) load. Behavioral measures supplemented with biomechanical measures, from three-dimensional motion analysis synchronized to a voice recording were used to assess children's performance and FC functionality (total duration, inter-finger [IF] transition, IF variance, finger/voice synchronization, and automatization of FC movements). Children with DCD were less accurate than TD children in using FC to solve ordinal problems with high WM load. This group difference could not be accounted for by poor FC skills given that FC movement turned out to be as functional in children with DCD as in their TD peers. When added to the model as a covariate, WM captured a greater proportion of intergroup variability than manual dexterity, further suggesting that their difficulties would be better accounted for by limited WM resources than by fine motor skills.
少数研究试图了解运动缺陷如何影响发育性协调障碍(DCD)儿童的数字能力。本研究的目的是探讨DCD儿童手指计数(FC)的功能。研究参与者为15名DCD儿童和15名在学校水平和流体推理能力方面相匹配的发育正常(TD)儿童,要求他们使用FC来解决一项具有高工作记忆(WM)负荷的序数任务。通过同步到语音记录的三维运动分析补充行为测量,以评估儿童的表现和FC功能(总持续时间、手指间[IF]转换、IF方差、手指/语音同步以及FC动作的自动化)。在使用FC解决具有高WM负荷的序数问题时,DCD儿童的准确性低于TD儿童。考虑到FC动作在DCD儿童中与在TD同龄人中一样具有功能性,这种组间差异不能用FC技能差来解释。当作为协变量添加到模型中时,WM比手动灵活性捕获了更大比例的组间变异性,这进一步表明,与精细运动技能相比,有限的WM资源更能解释他们的困难。