Suppr超能文献

大多数骨科富血小板血浆研究未报告方案和成分:一项更新的系统评价。

Most Orthopaedic Platelet-Rich Plasma Investigations Don't Report Protocols and Composition: An Updated Systematic Review.

作者信息

Lim Joseph J, Belk John W, Wharton Benjamin R, McCarthy Timothy P, McCarty Eric C, Dragoo Jason L, Frank Rachel M

机构信息

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A..

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2025 Mar;41(3):821-834. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.021. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to assess the heterogeneity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition reporting for the treatment of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic pathologies.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify Level I and Level II studies from 2016 to 2022 that evaluated the use of PRP therapy for musculoskeletal pathologies. The search phrase used was "platelet-rich plasma clinical studies." Studies were assessed based on their reporting of the PRP preparation methods and reporting of PRP composition.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four studies (in 120 articles) met inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, 15 (12.1%) provided comprehensive reporting, including a clear, well-described, and reproducible preparation protocol that future investigators can follow. Thirty-three studies (26.6%) quantitatively reported the final PRP product composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the studies using PRP for the treatment of musculoskeletal/orthopaedic pathologies, less than 20% provided a clear, well-described, and reproducible PRP preparation protocol, and only one-fourth of studies reported on the final PRP product composition.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A diverse current reporting of PRP composition between studies provides a high heterogeneity of the term "PRP," which becomes a limitation for a comparison of studies using PRP.

摘要

目的

系统回顾文献,评估用于治疗肌肉骨骼/骨科疾病的富血小板血浆(PRP)制备和成分报告的异质性。

方法

通过检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase进行系统回顾,以识别2016年至2022年评估PRP疗法用于肌肉骨骼疾病的I级和II级研究。使用的检索词为“富血小板血浆临床研究”。根据研究对PRP制备方法的报告和PRP成分的报告进行评估。

结果

124项研究(120篇文章)符合纳入分析标准。在这些研究中,15项(12.1%)提供了全面报告,包括清晰、详细描述且可重复的制备方案,可供未来研究人员遵循。33项研究(26.6%)定量报告了最终PRP产品成分。

结论

在使用PRP治疗肌肉骨骼/骨科疾病的研究中,不到20%提供了清晰、详细描述且可重复的PRP制备方案,只有四分之一的研究报告了最终PRP产品成分。

临床意义

目前各研究间PRP成分报告多样,使得“PRP”一词存在高度异质性,这成为比较使用PRP的研究的一个限制因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验