• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能源安全与碳霾协同治理的增效作用:基于偏向性技术进步视角。

The synergy effect of energy security and carbon-haze collaborative management: From the perspective of biased technological progress.

机构信息

School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.

China Center for Energy Economics Research, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 1):118741. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118741. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2024.118741
PMID:38522744
Abstract

It is important to ensure energy security and achieve carbon-haze collaborative management for sustainable development. Reducing imported energy dependence is necessary to maintain energy security, while its impact on environmental quality remains unclear. From the perspective of biased technological progress, this paper estimates the level of biased technological progress towards self-sufficient energy by a heterogeneous stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) function, and then empirically examines whether self-sufficient energy biased technological progress has a dampening effect on haze pollution and carbon emissions. It is found that: (1) Self-sufficient energy biased technological progress can effectively reduce haze pollution and carbon emissions, achieving a synergistic effect between energy security and carbon-haze collaborative management. (2) "Efficiency enhancement" and "quality improvement" are the essential mechanisms for the synergistic effect. (3) Environmental regulation, abundant resource and technology endowments can enhance the haze reduction effect. And the lower dependence on foreign trade and stable global economic policy environment are more conducive to achieving carbon-haze collaborative control. (4) In the Eastern and Western regions, self-sufficient energy biased technology can be sped up to alleviate haze pollution. The findings can enrich the research exploring pollution control from the perspective of biased technological progress, and provide policy recommendations for promoting high-quality development.

摘要

确保能源安全并实现碳霾协同管理对于可持续发展至关重要。为了维护能源安全,减少对进口能源的依赖是必要的,但它对环境质量的影响尚不清楚。从偏向性技术进步的角度出发,本文利用异质随机前沿分析(SFA)函数估计了自给能源偏向性技术进步的水平,然后实证检验了自给能源偏向性技术进步对雾霾污染和碳排放是否具有抑制作用。研究结果表明:(1)自给能源偏向性技术进步可以有效降低雾霾污染和碳排放,实现能源安全与碳霾协同管理的协同效应;(2)“效率提升”和“质量改善”是协同效应的本质机制;(3)环境规制、丰富的资源和技术禀赋可以增强减排效果,较低的对外贸易依存度和稳定的全球经济政策环境更有利于实现碳霾协同控制;(4)在东部和西部地区,加快自给能源偏向性技术进步可以缓解雾霾污染。研究结果丰富了从偏向性技术进步角度探索污染控制的研究,并为促进高质量发展提供了政策建议。

相似文献

1
The synergy effect of energy security and carbon-haze collaborative management: From the perspective of biased technological progress.能源安全与碳霾协同治理的增效作用:基于偏向性技术进步视角。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 1):118741. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118741. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
2
How does carbon biased technological progress promote carbon haze collaborative Governance?Evidence from Chinese cities.碳偏向型技术进步如何促进碳霾协同治理?来自中国城市的证据。
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119312. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119312. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
3
The impact of carbon-biased technological progress on carbon haze coordinated governance: insights from China.碳偏向型技术进步对碳霾协同治理的影响:来自中国的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(25):36329-36348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28614-6. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
How does biased technological progress affect haze pollution? Evidence from APEC economies.偏向性技术进步如何影响雾霾污染?来自 APEC 经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):54543-54560. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19568-2. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
The role of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization in promoting synergistic carbon and haze governance: insights from technological innovation.中国式财政分权在促进碳与雾霾协同治理中的作用:来自技术创新的见解
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(25):36417-36439. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30660-z. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Does Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Alleviate Urban Haze Pollution? Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China.低碳城市试点政策能缓解城市雾霾污染吗?来自中国准自然实验的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111287.
7
Central vertical regulation and urban environment-biased technological progress: evidence from China.中心垂直调控与城市环境偏向型技术进步:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(25):36440-36453. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31088-1. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
8
Environmental regulation, green technology progress and haze reduction and carbon reduction.环境规制、绿色技术进步与降污减排。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(25):36367-36383. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29903-w. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
9
Innovating from the ground up: the impact of key technological advancements on collaborative carbon and haze governance.从基础创新:关键技术进步对协同碳和雾霾治理的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(25):36474-36491. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31611-4. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
10
The impact of technological progress on China's haze pollution-based on decomposition and rebound research.技术进步对中国雾霾污染的影响——基于分解和回弹研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22306-22324. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16895-8. Epub 2021 Nov 16.