• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植后受者性别与超额死亡率的差异:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。

Differences in excess mortality by recipient sex after heart transplant: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Nephrology Division, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jul;43(7):1162-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.016. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.016
PMID:38522764
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of differences in mortality risk between female and male heart transplant recipients may prompt sex-specific management strategies. Because worldwide, males of all ages have higher absolute mortality rates than females, we aimed to compare the excess risk of mortality (risk above the general population) in female vs male heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

We used relative survival models conducted separately in SRTR and CTS cohorts from 1988-2019, and subsequently combined using 2-stage individual patient data meta-analysis, to compare the excess risk of mortality in female vs male first heart transplant recipients, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient current age.

RESULTS

We analyzed 108,918 patients. When the donor was male, female recipients 0-12 years (Relative excess risk (RER) 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.26), 13-44 years (RER 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.25), and ≥45 years (RER 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27) showed higher excess mortality risks than male recipients of the same age. When the donor was female, only female recipients 13-44 years showed higher excess risks of mortality than males (RER 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.20), though not significantly (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a male donor, female recipients of all ages had significantly higher excess mortality than males. When the donor was female, female recipients of reproductive age had higher excess risks of mortality than male recipients of the same age, though this was not statistically significant. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons underlying these differences.

摘要

背景

确定女性和男性心脏移植受者死亡率风险的差异可能会促使制定针对特定性别的管理策略。由于全球范围内,所有年龄段的男性死亡率绝对高于女性,因此我们旨在比较女性和男性心脏移植受者的死亡率超额风险(高于普通人群的风险)。

方法

我们分别使用来自 1988 年至 2019 年 SRTR 和 CTS 队列的相对生存模型,并使用 2 阶段个体患者数据荟萃分析进行联合,以比较女性和男性首次心脏移植受者的死亡率超额风险,同时考虑供体性别和受体当前年龄的调节作用。

结果

我们分析了 108918 名患者。当供体为男性时,0-12 岁(相对超额风险(RER)1.13,95%置信区间(CI)1.00-1.26)、13-44 岁(RER 1.17,95%CI 1.10-1.25)和≥45 岁(RER 1.14,95%CI 1.02-1.27)的女性受者的超额死亡风险高于同年龄的男性受者。当供体为女性时,只有 13-44 岁的女性受者的超额死亡风险高于男性(RER 1.09,95%CI 1.00-1.20),尽管差异不显著(p=0.05)。

结论

在男性供体的情况下,所有年龄段的女性受者的超额死亡风险明显高于男性。当供体为女性时,生殖年龄的女性受者的死亡率超额风险高于同年龄的男性受者,但这在统计学上并不显著。需要进一步调查以确定这些差异的原因。

相似文献

1
Differences in excess mortality by recipient sex after heart transplant: An individual patient data meta-analysis.心脏移植后受者性别与超额死亡率的差异:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jul;43(7):1162-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.016. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
2
Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.性别作为肾移植后同种异体移植及患者相关预后的预测因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD014966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014966.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Donor History of Drug Use and Graft Survival in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients.小儿心脏移植受者的供体药物使用史与移植物存活情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e257766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7766.
5
Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients.心脏移植受者的免疫抑制性T细胞抗体诱导治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 2;2013(12):CD008842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008842.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Increasing Trends of Pediatric Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures in the United States from 2004 to 2023: A 20-year National Injury Review Depicting Shifts in Mechanisms of Injury.2004年至2023年美国儿童胸腰椎骨折的增长趋势:一项为期20年的全国性损伤回顾,描绘损伤机制的变化
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003421.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex- and Age-based Comparison of Key Clinical Markers of Immunity After Heart and Kidney Transplantation.心脏和肾脏移植后免疫关键临床标志物的性别和年龄比较
Transplant Direct. 2025 Aug 22;11(9):e1846. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001846. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Sex Differences in Excess Mortality Among Waitlisted Kidney, Heart, and Liver Transplant Candidates.等待肾、心脏和肝脏移植的候选者中过高死亡率的性别差异。
Transplant Direct. 2025 Aug 22;11(9):e1856. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001856. eCollection 2025 Sep.