Suppr超能文献

肩盂前上盂唇前后向撕裂(Type V superior labrum anterior to posterior repair)的系统评价。

Type V superior labrum anterior to posterior repair: a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Aug;33(8):e443-e450. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.054. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to systematically review the evidence in the literature to ascertain the functional outcomes, recurrence rates, and subsequent revision rates following type V superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, utilizing the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library Databases. Studies were included if they had clinical outcomes on the patients undergoing type V SLAP repair. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Our review found 13 studies, including 451 shoulders meeting our inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were males (89.3%), with an average age of 25.9 years (range 15-58) and a mean follow-up of 53.8 months. The Rowe score was the most utilized functional outcome score, with a weighted mean of 88.5. Additionally, the mean Constant score was 91.0, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 88.3, the mean subjective shoulder value score was 85.5%, and the mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.2. The overall rate of return to play was 84.8%, with 80.2% returning to the same level of play. The overall reoperation rate was 6.1%, with a recurrent dislocation rate of 8.2%. In the studies comparing type V SLAP and isolated Bankart repair, there were statistically insignificant differences in visual analog scale pain scores (mean difference; 0.15, 95% confidence interval, -0.13 to 0.44, I = 0%, P = .29) and recurrence rates (risk ratio; 1.38, 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.15, I = 0%, P = .16).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic repair of type V SLAP tears results in excellent functional outcomes, with high return to play rates in athletes. There are low rates of reoperations and recurrent dislocations. Additionally, in comparison to an isolated Bankart repair, SLAP repair does not increase recurrence rates or postoperative pain.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在系统地回顾文献中的证据,以确定 V 型前上盂唇前后撕裂(SLAP)修复后的功能结果、复发率和后续翻修率。

方法

两名独立的审查员根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了文献检索,利用 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。如果研究中有接受 V 型 SLAP 修复的患者的临床结果,则纳入研究。使用 SPSS(IBM,Armonk,NY,USA)进行统计分析。P 值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

我们的综述发现了 13 项研究,包括 451 例符合纳入标准的肩部。大多数患者为男性(89.3%),平均年龄 25.9 岁(15-58 岁),平均随访时间为 53.8 个月。Rowe 评分是最常用的功能结果评分,加权平均值为 88.5。此外,平均 Constant 评分为 91.0,平均美国肩肘外科医生评分为 88.3,平均主观肩部价值评分为 85.5%,平均视觉模拟评分疼痛评分为 1.2。总体重返运动率为 84.8%,80.2%的患者回到相同的运动水平。总体再次手术率为 6.1%,复发性脱位率为 8.2%。在比较 V 型 SLAP 和孤立 Bankart 修复的研究中,视觉模拟评分疼痛(平均差异;0.15,95%置信区间,-0.13 至 0.44,I = 0%,P = 0.29)和复发率(风险比;1.38,95%置信区间,0.88-2.15,I = 0%,P = 0.16)差异无统计学意义。

结论

关节镜修复 V 型 SLAP 撕裂可获得良好的功能结果,运动员重返运动的比例较高。再次手术和复发性脱位的发生率较低。此外,与孤立 Bankart 修复相比,SLAP 修复不会增加复发率或术后疼痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验