Suppr超能文献

奶牛口腔微生物组作为其采食量的替代指标。

The oral microbiome as a proxy for feed intake in dairy cattle.

机构信息

Departamento de Producción Agraria, ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria - CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

ICREA, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2024 Aug;107(8):5881-5896. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24014. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

Abstract

Genetic material from rumen microorganisms can be found within the oral cavity, and hence there is potential in using the oral microbiome as a proxy of the ruminal microbiome. Feed intake (FI) influences the composition of rumen microbiota and might directly influence the oral microbiome in dairy cattle. Ruminal content samples (RS) from 29 cows were collected at the beginning of the study and also 42 d later (RS0 and RS42, respectively). Additionally, 18 oral samples were collected through buccal swabbing at d 42 (OS42) from randomly selected cows. Samples were used to characterize and compare the taxonomy and functionality of the oral microbiome using nanopore sequencing and to evaluate the feasibility of using the oral microbiome to estimate FI. Up to 186 taxonomical features were found differentially abundant (DA) between RS and OS42. Similar results were observed when comparing OS42 to RS collected on different days. Microorganisms associated with the liquid fraction of the rumen were less abundant in OS42 because these were probably swallowed after regurgitation. Up to 1,102 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were found to be DA between RS and OS42, and these results differed when comparing time of collection, but DA KEGG pathways were mainly associated with metabolism in both situations. Models based on the oral microbiome and rumen microbiome differed in their selection of microbial groups and biological pathways to predict FI. In the rumen, fiber-associated microorganisms are considered suitable indicators of FI. In contrast, biofilm formers like Gammaproteobacteria or Bacteroidia classes are deemed appropriate proxies for predicting FI from oral samples. Models from RS exhibited some predictive ability to estimate FI, but oral samples substantially outperformed them. The best lineal model to estimate FI was obtained with the relative abundance of taxonomical feature at genera level, achieving an average R = 0.88 within the training data, and a root mean square error of 3.46 ± 0.83 (±SD) kg of DM, as well as a Pearson correlation coefficient between observed and estimated FI of 0.48 ± 0.30 in the test data. The results from this study suggest that oral microbiome has potential to predict FI in dairy cattle, and it encourages validating this potential in other populations.

摘要

瘤胃微生物的遗传物质可在口腔内发现,因此口腔微生物组有可能作为瘤胃微生物组的替代物。采食量(FI)会影响瘤胃微生物群落的组成,并可能直接影响奶牛的口腔微生物组。在研究开始时采集了 29 头奶牛的瘤胃液样本(RS),并在 42 天后(分别为 RS0 和 RS42)再次采集。此外,在第 42 天还通过颊拭子从随机选择的奶牛中采集了 18 个口腔样本(OS42)。使用纳米孔测序对口腔微生物组进行了特征分析和功能比较,并评估了使用口腔微生物组来估计 FI 的可行性。在 RS 和 OS42 之间发现了多达 186 个分类特征存在差异丰度(DA)。当比较 OS42 与在不同时间采集的 RS 时,也观察到了类似的结果。与瘤胃液液体部分相关的微生物在 OS42 中较少,因为这些微生物可能在反刍后被吞咽。在 RS 和 OS42 之间发现了多达 1102 个京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径存在差异,并且当比较采集时间时,这些结果会有所不同,但 DA KEGG 途径主要与两种情况下的代谢有关。基于口腔微生物组和瘤胃微生物组的模型在选择微生物组和生物途径来预测 FI 方面存在差异。在瘤胃中,与纤维相关的微生物被认为是 FI 的合适指标。相比之下,厚壁菌门或拟杆菌门等生物膜形成菌被认为是从口腔样本预测 FI 的合适代表。来自 RS 的模型显示出一定的预测 FI 的能力,但口腔样本的表现要优于它们。通过相对丰度在属水平上的分类特征,获得了最佳的线性模型来估计 FI,在训练数据中平均 R = 0.88,均方根误差为 3.46 ± 0.83(±SD)kg DM,以及在测试数据中观察到的和估计 FI 之间的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.48 ± 0.30。本研究结果表明,口腔微生物组有可能预测奶牛的 FI,并鼓励在其他群体中验证这一潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验