Jepsen Karl J, Bigelow Erin M R, Goulet Robert W, Nolan Bonnie T, Casden Michael A, Kennedy Kathryn, Hertz Samantha, Kadur Chandan, Clines Gregory A, Leis Aleda M, Karvonen-Gutierrez Carrie A, Bredbenner Todd L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 United States.
Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201 United States.
JBMR Plus. 2024 Jan 30;8(4):ziae013. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae013. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Hip areal BMD (aBMD) is widely used to identify individuals with increased fracture risk. Low aBMD indicates low strength, but this association differs by sex with men showing greater strength for a given aBMD than women. To better understand the structural basis giving rise to this sex-specific discrepancy, cadaveric proximal femurs from White female and male donors were imaged using nano-CT and loaded in a sideways fall configuration to assess strength. FN pseudoDXA images were generated to identify associations among structure, aBMD, and strength that differ by sex. Strength correlated significantly with pseudoDXA aBMD for females ( = 0.468, < .001) and males ( = 0.393, < .001), but the elevations (-intercepts) of the linear regressions differed between sexes ( < .001). Male proximal femurs were 1045 N stronger than females for a given pseudoDXA aBMD. However, strength correlated with pseudoDXA BMC for females ( = 0.433, < .001) and males ( = 0.443, < .001) but without significant slope ( = .431) or elevation ( = .058) differences. Dividing pseudoDXA BMC by FN-width, total cross-sectional area, or FN-volume led to significantly different associations between strength and the size-adjusted BMC measures for women and men. Three structural differences were identified that differentially affected aBMD and strength for women and men: First, men had more bone mass per unit volume than women; second, different cross-sectional shapes resulted in larger proportions of bone mass orthogonal to the DXA image for men than women; and third, men and women had different proportions of cortical and trabecular bone relative to BMC. Thus, the proximal femurs of women were not smaller versions of men but were constructed in fundamentally different manners. Dividing BMC by a bone size measure was responsible for the sex-specific associations between hip aBMD and strength. Thus, a new approach for adjusting measures of bone mass for bone size and stature is warranted.
髋部面积骨密度(aBMD)被广泛用于识别骨折风险增加的个体。低aBMD表明骨强度低,但这种关联因性别而异,在给定的aBMD水平下,男性比女性表现出更大的骨强度。为了更好地理解导致这种性别差异的结构基础,对来自白人女性和男性捐赠者的尸体近端股骨进行了纳米CT成像,并以侧方跌倒的姿势加载以评估骨强度。生成了股骨颈(FN)伪双能X线吸收法(pseudoDXA)图像,以确定结构、aBMD和骨强度之间因性别而异的关联。女性(r = 0.468,P <.001)和男性(r = 0.393,P <.001)的骨强度与伪DXA aBMD显著相关,但线性回归的截距在性别之间存在差异(P <.001)。在给定的伪DXA aBMD水平下,男性近端股骨比女性强1045 N。然而,女性(r = 0.433,P <.001)和男性(r = 0.443,P <.001)的骨强度与伪DXA骨矿含量(BMC)相关,但斜率(P =.431)或截距(P =.058)无显著差异。将伪DXA BMC除以FN宽度、总横截面积或FN体积,导致女性和男性的骨强度与尺寸调整后的BMC测量值之间的关联存在显著差异。确定了三个结构差异,它们对女性和男性的aBMD和骨强度有不同影响:第一,男性每单位体积的骨量比女性多;第二,不同的横截面形状导致男性与DXA图像正交的骨量比例大于女性;第三,相对于BMC,男性和女性的皮质骨和小梁骨比例不同。因此,女性的近端股骨不是男性的缩小版,而是以根本不同方式构建的。将BMC除以骨尺寸测量值导致髋部aBMD与骨强度之间存在性别特异性关联。因此,有必要采用一种新方法来根据骨尺寸和身高调整骨量测量值。