Suppr超能文献

为英式英语使用者开发用于临床听力学的新型开放集语音材料。

Development of New Open-Set Speech Material for Use in Clinical Audiology with Speakers of British English.

作者信息

Keshavarzi Mahmoud, Salorio-Corbetto Marina, Reichenbach Tobias, Marriage Josephine, Moore Brian C J

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering and Centre for Neurotechnology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Cambridge Hearing Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2024 Feb 26;14(2):264-279. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14020024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chear open-set performance test (COPT), which uses a carrier phrase followed by a monosyllabic test word, is intended for clinical assessment of speech recognition, evaluation of hearing-device performance, and the fine-tuning of hearing devices for speakers of British English. This paper assesses practice effects, test-retest reliability, and the variability across lists of the COPT.

METHOD

In experiment 1, 16 normal-hearing participants were tested using an initial version of the COPT, at three speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Experiment 2 used revised COPT lists, with items swapped between lists to reduce differences in difficulty across lists. In experiment 3, test-retest repeatability was assessed for stimuli presented in quiet, using 15 participants with sensorineural hearing loss.

RESULTS

After administration of a single practice list, no practice effects were evident. The critical difference between scores for two lists was about 2 words (out of 15) or 5 phonemes (out of 50). The mean estimated SNR required for 74% words correct was -0.56 dB, with a standard deviation across lists of 0.16 dB. For the participants with hearing loss tested in quiet, the critical difference between scores for two lists was about 3 words (out of 15) or 6 phonemes (out of 50).

摘要

背景

Chear开放集性能测试(COPT)使用一个载体短语后跟一个单音节测试词,旨在用于语音识别的临床评估、听力设备性能评估以及为英式英语使用者微调听力设备。本文评估了COPT的练习效应、重测信度以及不同测试列表间的变异性。

方法

在实验1中,16名听力正常的参与者使用COPT的初始版本,在三种信噪比(SNR)条件下进行测试。实验2使用修订后的COPT列表,各列表间的项目进行了互换以减少列表间难度差异。在实验3中,使用15名感音神经性听力损失患者,评估了安静环境中呈现刺激时的重测重复性。

结果

在给予一个练习列表后,未观察到明显的练习效应。两个列表分数的临界差异约为2个单词(共15个)或5个音素(共50个)。正确识别74%单词所需的平均估计信噪比为-0.56 dB,各列表间的标准差为0.16 dB。对于在安静环境中测试的听力损失患者,两个列表分数的临界差异约为3个单词(共15个)或6个音素(共50个)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a15/10961685/1c855e4cf728/audiolres-14-00024-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验