The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Aug;58(6):685-686. doi: 10.1177/15385744241241856. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
In this letter, we discussed the selection of patients undergoing Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We examined a previous study using CPT code 37215 to identify TCAR cases using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. As an ACS-NSQIP participating site, we have complete access to the ACS-NSQIP database, and we performed a more in-depth examination of the method. We found significant discrepancies in the method described and conclude that it is methodologically flawed to use CPT code 37215 to differentiate TCAR cases. This study not only re-evaluates the validity of the previous study but also has the potential to prevent other researchers from employing the erroneous methodology for TCAR selection using the CPT code, which is one of the most widely used standardizations of medical communication for surgical procedures. This is particularly pertinent given the recent "TCAR revolution", where significant attention has been focused on TCAR.
在这封信中,我们讨论了使用当前程序术语 (CPT) 代码选择接受经颈动脉血管重建术 (TCAR) 的患者。我们研究了一项先前使用 CPT 代码 37215 来使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划 (ACS-NSQIP) 数据库识别 TCAR 病例的研究。作为 ACS-NSQIP 参与站点,我们可以完全访问 ACS-NSQIP 数据库,并对该方法进行了更深入的检查。我们发现所描述的方法存在显著差异,并得出结论,使用 CPT 代码 37215 来区分 TCAR 病例在方法学上存在缺陷。这项研究不仅重新评估了先前研究的有效性,还有可能防止其他研究人员在使用 CPT 代码选择 TCAR 时采用错误的方法,CPT 代码是手术程序中最广泛使用的医疗沟通标准化之一。鉴于最近 TCAR 的“革命”,这一点尤其重要,人们对 TCAR 给予了极大的关注。