The FDA in the Crosshairs-Science, Politics, and Abortion.
作者信息
Fernandez Lynch Holly, Kesselheim Aaron S
机构信息
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
出版信息
JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1269-1270. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2229.
PMID:38526475
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The FDA in the Crosshairs-Science, Politics, and Abortion.
JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1269-1270. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2229.
2
Understanding the Impacts of the Supreme Court Case FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.
JAMA. 2024 May 14;331(18):1529-1530. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5376.
3
A Physician Attack on the FDA - Will the Supreme Court Reduce Access to Mifepristone?
N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 8;390(6):563-567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2312012. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
The Supreme Court's Abortion Exceptionalism - Judicial Deference, Medical Science, and Mifepristone Access.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):e94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2104461. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
Requests for Abortion Medications for Future Use Surged Post-Dobbs.
JAMA. 2024 Feb 6;331(5):385. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27438.
6
Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1768-1770. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18865.
7
Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
JAMA. 2024 May 14;331(18):1558-1564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4266.
8
Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
Loyola Univ Chic Law J. 2000 Summer;31(4):693-736.
9
Food and Drug Administration v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine-A Cautious Win for Reproductive Health Care and FDA Authority.
JAMA. 2024 Aug 13;332(6):453-454. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13161.
10
US Supreme Court to review "partial birth abortion" law.
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):506. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7540.506-a.
Zotero 插件