• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Update of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Role and Timing of Decompressive Surgery.急性脊髓损伤患者管理临床实践指南更新:关于减压手术的作用及时机的建议
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):174S-186S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231181883.
2
Timing of Decompressive Surgery in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review Update.急性脊髓损伤患者减压手术的时机:系统评价更新
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):38S-57S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231197404.
3
A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on Hemodynamic Management.急性脊髓损伤患者管理临床实践指南:血流动力学管理建议
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):187S-211S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231202348.
4
An Overview of the Methodology Used to Develop Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Acute and Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury.急性和术中脊髓损伤管理临床实践指南制定方法概述
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):25S-37S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231215266.
5
The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.急性脊髓损伤手术减压时机的影响:一项个体患者数据的汇总分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Feb;20(2):117-126. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30406-3. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
6
A Clinical Practice Guideline on the Timing of Surgical Decompression and Hemodynamic Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury and the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury: Introduction, Rationale, and Scope.急性脊髓损伤手术减压时机与血流动力学管理以及术中脊髓损伤的预防、诊断和管理临床实践指南:引言、理论依据和范围
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):10S-24S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231183969.
7
The 2023 AO Spine-Praxis Guidelines in Acute Spinal Cord Injury: What Have We Learned? What Are the Critical Knowledge Gaps and Barriers to Implementation?2023年AO脊柱-实践急性脊髓损伤指南:我们学到了什么?实施过程中的关键知识空白和障碍是什么?
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):223S-230S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231196825.
8
AO Spine/Praxis Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: An Introduction to a Focus Issue.AO脊柱/实践急性脊髓损伤管理临床实践指南:聚焦问题介绍
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):5S-9S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231189928.
9
Timing of Decompression in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.急性脊髓损伤患者减压的时机:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):95S-115S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701716. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Ultra-early Spinal Decompression Surgery Can Improve Neurological Outcome of Complete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.超早期脊髓减压手术可改善完全性颈脊髓损伤的神经功能预后;一项系统评价与Meta分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 31;10(1):e11. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1471. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining Pediatric SCIWORA: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Clinical Patterns, Imaging Profiles, and Management Insights.重新定义儿童无放射影像异常的脊髓损伤:关于临床模式、影像学特征及管理见解的文献系统综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):6338. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176338.
2
Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.脊髓肿胀和硬膜内压迫可预测急性颈髓创伤性脊髓损伤后的神经功能恢复。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0325827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325827. eCollection 2025.
3
Emerging advances in spinal cord injury: An introductory overview.脊髓损伤的新进展:概述
Brain Spine. 2025 Jun 25;5:104307. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104307. eCollection 2025.
4
Design and protocol for the decompression-plus trial: a phase 1 clinical study of dorsal myelotomy and expansive duroplasty with or without autologous nerve grafting in acute traumatic spinal cord injury.减压加试验的设计与方案:急性创伤性脊髓损伤中背侧脊髓切开术和扩大硬脊膜成形术联合或不联合自体神经移植的1期临床研究
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 8;48(1):547. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03701-z.
5
The Pathological Role and Therapeutic potential of ALDH2 in acrolein detoxification Following Spinal Cord Injury in Mice.乙醛脱氢酶2在小鼠脊髓损伤后丙烯醛解毒中的病理作用及治疗潜力
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 8:2025.06.08.658505. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.08.658505.
6
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Surgical Management of Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Contemporary Concepts.AO脊柱急性创伤性脊髓损伤外科治疗的临床实践推荐:当代概念
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 8:21925682251350941. doi: 10.1177/21925682251350941.
7
Spinal cord injury in severely injured patients: results from the Swiss Trauma Registry.重伤患者的脊髓损伤:来自瑞士创伤登记处的结果。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 5;33(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01420-4.
8
Traumatic spinal cord injury: a review of the current state of art and future directions - what do we know and where are we going?创伤性脊髓损伤:当前技术水平与未来方向综述——我们知道什么,又将走向何方?
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Mar 5;22:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100601. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Advances and New Therapies in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性脊髓损伤的进展与新疗法
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):2203. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072203.
10
Duraplasty in acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review.急性脊髓损伤中的硬脊膜成形术:一项系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08811-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurological recovery after early versus delayed surgical decompression for acute traumatic spinal cord injury.急性创伤性脊髓损伤早期与延迟手术减压后的神经恢复。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Mar 15;105-B(4):400-411. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B4.BJJ-2022-0947.R2.
2
Early vs Late Surgical Decompression for Central Cord Syndrome.颈脊髓中央综合征的早期与晚期手术减压。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Nov 1;157(11):1024-1032. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4454.
3
Impact of Surgical Timing on Motor Level Lowering in Motor Complete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Patients.手术时机对运动完全性外伤性脊髓损伤患者运动平面降低的影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 May;39(9-10):651-657. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0428. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Effect of Early vs Delayed Surgical Treatment on Motor Recovery in Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury With Preexisting Cervical Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.早期与延迟手术治疗对伴有先前颈椎狭窄的不完全性颈椎脊髓损伤患者运动功能恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33604.
5
Direct Cost of Illness for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.脊髓损伤疾病的直接成本:一项系统评价。
Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1267-1281. doi: 10.1177/21925682211031190. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Surgical Decompression for Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury in 73 Patients.73例胸段及胸腰段脊髓损伤早期与晚期手术减压的随机对照试验
Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Sep 18;1(1):78-87. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0027. eCollection 2020.
7
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:2019年修订版》
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):1-22. doi: 10.46292/sci2702-1.
8
Efficacy of Early (≤ 24 Hours), Late (25-72 Hours), and Delayed (>72 Hours) Surgery with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Confirmed Decompression in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades C and D Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome Caused by Spinal Stenosis.磁共振成像证实减压的急性创伤性中央索综合征在脊柱狭窄导致的美国脊柱损伤协会损伤分级 C 和 D 中的早期(≤24 小时)、晚期(25-72 小时)和延迟(>72 小时)手术的疗效。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Aug 1;38(15):2073-2083. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0040. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.急性脊髓损伤手术减压时机的影响:一项个体患者数据的汇总分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Feb;20(2):117-126. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30406-3. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
10
Comparison of Early Surgical Treatment With Conservative Treatment of Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Major Fracture or Dislocation in Patients With Pre-existing Cervical Spinal Stenosis.比较伴有颈椎狭窄症的无主要骨折或脱位的不完全性颈脊髓损伤患者的早期手术治疗与保守治疗。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Apr 1;34(3):E141-E146. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001065.

急性脊髓损伤患者管理临床实践指南更新:关于减压手术的作用及时机的建议

An Update of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Role and Timing of Decompressive Surgery.

作者信息

Fehlings Michael G, Tetreault Lindsay A, Hachem Laureen, Evaniew Nathan, Ganau Mario, McKenna Stephen L, Neal Chris J, Nagoshi Narihito, Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa, Aarabi Bizhan, Hofstetter Christoph P, Wengel Valerie Ter, Nakashima Hiroaki, Martin Allan R, Kirshblum Steven, Rodrigues Pinto Ricardo, Marco Rex A W, Wilson Jefferson R, Kahn David E, Newcombe Virginia F J, Zipser Carl M, Douglas Sam, Kurpad Shekar N, Lu Yi, Saigal Rajiv, Samadani Uzma, Arnold Paul M, Hawryluk Gregory W J, Skelly Andrea C, Kwon Brian K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):174S-186S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231181883.

DOI:10.1177/21925682231181883
PMID:38526922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10964895/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical practice guideline development.

OBJECTIVES

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in devastating motor, sensory, and autonomic impairment; loss of independence; and reduced quality of life. Preclinical evidence suggests that early decompression of the spinal cord may help to limit secondary injury, reduce damage to the neural tissue, and improve functional outcomes. Emerging evidence indicates that "early" surgical decompression completed within 24 hours of injury also improves neurological recovery in patients with acute SCI. The objective of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to update the 2017 recommendations on the timing of surgical decompression and to evaluate the evidence with respect to ultra-early surgery (in particular, but not limited to, <12 hours after acute SCI).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary, international, guideline development group (GDG) was formed that consisted of spine surgeons, neurologists, critical care specialists, emergency medicine doctors, physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals, as well as individuals living with SCI. A systematic review was conducted based on accepted methodological standards to evaluate the impact of early (within 24 hours of acute SCI) or ultra-early (in particular, but not limited to, within 12 hours of acute SCI) surgery on neurological recovery, functional outcomes, administrative outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness. The GRADE approach was used to rate the overall strength of evidence across studies for each primary outcome. Using the "evidence-to-recommendation" framework, recommendations were then developed that considered the balance of benefits and harms, financial impact, patient values, acceptability, and feasibility. The guideline was internally appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.

RESULTS

The GDG recommended that early surgery (≤24 hours after injury) be offered as the preferred option for adult patients with acute SCI regardless of level. This recommendation was based on moderate evidence suggesting that patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) grades at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, patients undergoing early surgery improved by an additional 4.50 (95% 1.70 to 7.29) points on the ASIA Motor Score compared to patients undergoing surgery after 24 hours post-injury. The GDG also agreed that a recommendation for ultra-early surgery could not be made on the basis of the current evidence because of the small sample sizes, variable definitions of what constituted ultra-early in the literature, and the inconsistency of the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that patients with an acute SCI, regardless of level, undergo surgery within 24 hours after injury when medically feasible. Future research is required to determine the differential effectiveness of early surgery in different subpopulations and the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological recovery. Moreover, further work is required to define what constitutes effective spinal cord decompression and to individualize care. It is also recognized that a concerted international effort will be required to translate these recommendations into policy.

摘要

研究设计

临床实践指南制定。

目的

急性脊髓损伤(SCI)可导致严重的运动、感觉和自主神经功能障碍;丧失独立性;以及生活质量下降。临床前证据表明,脊髓早期减压可能有助于限制继发性损伤,减少神经组织损伤,并改善功能结局。新出现的证据表明,在损伤后24小时内完成的“早期”手术减压也可改善急性SCI患者的神经功能恢复。本临床实践指南(CPG)的目的是更新2017年关于手术减压时机的建议,并评估关于超早期手术(特别是但不限于急性SCI后<12小时)的证据。

方法

组建了一个多学科的国际指南制定小组(GDG),成员包括脊柱外科医生、神经科医生、重症监护专家、急诊医生、物理医学与康复专业人员以及脊髓损伤患者。根据公认的方法标准进行系统评价,以评估早期(急性SCI后24小时内)或超早期(特别是但不限于急性SCI后12小时内)手术对神经功能恢复、功能结局、管理结局、安全性和成本效益的影响。采用GRADE方法对每项主要结局的各项研究证据的总体强度进行评级。然后,使用“证据到推荐”框架,在考虑利弊平衡、财务影响、患者价值观、可接受性和可行性的基础上制定建议。该指南使用《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE)II工具进行内部评估。

结果

GDG建议,对于成年急性SCI患者,无论损伤节段如何,早期手术(损伤后≤24小时)应作为首选方案。该建议基于中等强度的证据,表明与24小时后减压的患者相比,在24小时内减压的患者在6个月时(相对危险度:2.76,95%置信区间1.60至4.98)和12个月时(相对危险度:1.95,95%置信区间1.26至3.18)恢复≥2个美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级(AIS)级别的可能性高出2倍。此外,与损伤后24小时后接受手术的患者相比,接受早期手术的患者在亚洲脊髓损伤运动评分上额外提高了4.50(95% 1.70至7.29)分。GDG还一致认为,由于样本量小、文献中超早期的定义不统一以及证据的不一致性,目前的证据无法支持超早期手术的建议。

结论

建议急性SCI患者在医学上可行的情况下,在损伤后24小时内接受手术。未来需要进行研究,以确定早期手术在不同亚组中的差异有效性以及超早期手术对神经功能恢复的影响。此外,还需要进一步开展工作,以明确有效的脊髓减压的构成要素并实现个体化护理。还认识到需要国际社会共同努力,将这些建议转化为政策。