Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Intensive Care, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001 9700 RB, Groningen, CA 62, the Netherlands.
Critical Care, Anesthesia, Peri-operative medicine & Emergency Medicine (CAPE), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Respir Res. 2024 Mar 25;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02749-7.
The underlying pathophysiological pathways how reverse triggering is being caused are not fully understood. Respiratory entrainment may be one of these mechanisms, but both terms are used interchangeably. We sought to characterize reverse triggering and the relationship with respiratory entrainment among mechanically ventilated children with and without acute lung injury.
We performed a secondary phyiology analysis of two previously published data sets of invasively mechanically ventilated children < 18 years with and without lung injury mechanically ventilated in a continuous or intermittent mandatory ventilation mode. Ventilator waveforms, electrical activity of the diaphragm measured with surface electromyography and oesophageal tracings were analyzed for entrained and non-entrained reverse triggered breaths.
In total 102 measurements (3110 min) from 67 patients (median age 4.9 [1.8 ; 19,1] months) were analyzed. Entrained RT was identified in 12 (12%) and non-entrained RT in 39 (38%) recordings. Breathing variability for entrained RT breaths was lower compared to non-entrained RT breaths. We did not observe breath stacking during entrained RT. Double triggering often occurred during non-entrained RT and led to an increased tidal volume. Patients with respiratory entrainment related RT had a shorter duration of MV and length of PICU stay.
Reverse triggering is not one entity but a clinical spectrum with different mechanisms and consequences.
Not applicable.
目前尚未完全了解反向触发是如何产生的潜在病理生理途径。呼吸同步可能是其中的一种机制,但这两个术语经常交替使用。我们试图描述机械通气的儿童中反向触发的特征及其与呼吸同步的关系,这些儿童患有或不患有急性肺损伤。
我们对两个先前发表的数据集进行了二次生理学分析,这两个数据集包含了接受连续或间歇强制通气模式通气的患有或不患有肺损伤的机械通气的儿童。分析了通气机波形、膈肌表面肌电图和食管描记图的电活动,以确定同步和非同步反向触发呼吸。
共分析了 67 名患者(中位数年龄 4.9 [1.8;19,1] 个月)的 102 次测量(3110 分钟)。在 12 次(12%)记录中发现了同步 RT,在 39 次(38%)记录中发现了非同步 RT。与非同步 RT 相比,同步 RT 呼吸的呼吸变异性较低。在同步 RT 期间没有观察到呼吸叠加。在非同步 RT 期间,经常发生双重触发,导致潮气量增加。与呼吸同步相关的 RT 患者的 MV 时间和 PICU 住院时间更短。
反向触发不是一种单一的实体,而是具有不同机制和后果的临床谱。
不适用。