Suppr超能文献

EGFR-TKI 联合化疗与 EGFR-TKI 单药治疗局部晚期 EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌的新辅助治疗比较。

Combination of EGFR-TKI and Chemotherapy Versus EGFR-TKI Monotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage III-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection Management, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2024 Jul 5;29(7):e932-e940. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae052.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy in patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant remains unsatisfactory. This study explored the potential benefits of combining first-generation EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients with III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received neoadjuvant therapy with EGFR-TKI at Shanghai Chest Hospital from October 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-generation TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment were included in the combination group, and those who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy were included in the monotherapy group. The study assessed the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), downstaging rates of pathologic lymph nodes (from stage N2 to N1 or N0), major pathologic response (MPR) rate, pathological complete response (PCR) rate, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 74 631 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were screened, and 60 patients were included, 7 of whom did not undergo surgery after neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Of the remaining 53 patients, 15 received first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 38 received EGFR-TKI monotherapy. The median follow-up time was 44.12 months. The ORR was 50.0% (9/18) in the combination group and 40.5% (17/42) in the monotherapy group (P = .495). The MPR rate was 20.0% (3/15) and 10.5% (4/38) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = .359). No patients achieved PCR in the combination group, while 3 (7.89%) attained PCR in the monotherapy group. The 2 groups did not differ in N2 downstaging rate (P = .459). The median DFS was not reached in the combination group, while it was 23.6 months (95% CI: 8.16-39.02) in the monotherapy group (P = .832). Adverse events observed were consistent with those commonly associated with the 2 treatments.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with first-generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy could be considered a neoadjuvant treatment option for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC, exhibiting acceptable toxicity. However, regarding short-term efficacy, combination therapy did not demonstrate superiority over EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Long-term follow-up is warranted for a more accurate assessment of the DFS and OS.

摘要

背景

表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)单药新辅助治疗 III-N2 期 EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效仍不令人满意。本研究旨在探讨第一代 EGFR-TKI 联合化疗作为 III-N2 期 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 新辅助治疗的潜在益处。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月在上海胸科医院接受 EGFR-TKI 新辅助治疗的 III-N2 期 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 患者的病历。将接受第一代 TKI 联合化疗作为新辅助治疗的 III-N2 期 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 患者纳入联合组,接受 EGFR-TKI 单药治疗的患者纳入单药组。研究根据实体瘤反应评价标准 1.1(RECIST)评估客观缓解率(ORR)、无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)、病理淋巴结降期率(从 N2 期到 N1 期或 N0 期)、主要病理缓解(MPR)率、病理完全缓解(PCR)率和安全性。

结果

共筛选出 74631 例 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 患者,纳入 60 例患者,其中 7 例在新辅助靶向治疗后未行手术。在剩余的 53 例患者中,15 例接受第一代 EGFR-TKI 联合化疗作为新辅助治疗,38 例接受 EGFR-TKI 单药治疗。中位随访时间为 44.12 个月。联合组的 ORR 为 50.0%(9/18),单药组为 40.5%(17/42)(P=0.495)。联合组和单药组的 MPR 率分别为 20.0%(3/15)和 10.5%(4/38)(P=0.359)。联合组无患者达到 PCR,而单药组有 3 例(7.89%)达到 PCR。两组的 N2 淋巴结降期率无差异(P=0.459)。联合组的中位 DFS 未达到,而单药组为 23.6 个月(95%CI:8.16-39.02)(P=0.832)。观察到的不良反应与两种治疗方法常见的不良反应一致。

结论

第一代 EGFR-TKI 联合化疗可作为 III-N2 期 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 的新辅助治疗选择,具有可接受的毒性。然而,就短期疗效而言,联合治疗并未显示优于 EGFR-TKI 单药治疗。需要进行长期随访以更准确评估 DFS 和 OS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be4d/11224993/878ae2e37a58/oyae052_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验