Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Psych J. 2024 Oct;13(5):813-823. doi: 10.1002/pchj.743. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Empirical research using the Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) has suggested that schizophrenia patients and people with schizotypal personality disorder exhibit lower empathic accuracy than healthy people. However, empathic accuracy in a subclinical sample with high levels of schizotypy has seldom been studied. Our study aimed to investigate empathy in a subclinical sample using the Chinese version of the EAT and a self-report empathy measure. Forty participants with high levels of schizotypy (HS participants) and 40 with low levels of schizotypy (LS participants), as measured by the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), were recruited. All participants completed the Chinese version of the EAT and the self-report Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Empathic accuracy (EA) scores and the intra-individual variability of EA scores were calculated. Independent samples t tests and Pearson correlation analyses were performed to examine group differences in empathy and the relationship between empathy and schizotypy respectively. HS participants exhibited reduced EA for both positive and negative videos, and larger intra-individual variability of EA for negative videos than LS participants. However, HS and LS participants did not differ in self-report cognitive empathy. Moreover, the interpersonal dimension of the SPQ was negatively correlated with EAT performance and self-report cognitive empathy in LS participants. Individuals with HS show poorer performance-based EA but relatively intact self-report cognitive empathy. This study provides empirical evidence for the ontogeny of empathy deficits in subclinical populations at risk of developing schizophrenia, supporting early interventions for social cognitive deficits.
使用共情准确性任务(EAT)进行的实证研究表明,精神分裂症患者和分裂型人格障碍患者的共情准确性低于健康人群。然而,对于具有高水平分裂型特质的亚临床样本中的共情准确性却很少有研究。本研究旨在使用 EAT 的中文版和自我报告的共情测量来研究亚临床样本中的共情。我们招募了 40 名具有高水平分裂型特质(HS 参与者)和 40 名具有低水平分裂型特质(LS 参与者)的参与者,这些特质是通过 Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire(SPQ)测量的。所有参与者都完成了 EAT 的中文版和自我报告的认知和情感共情问卷。计算了共情准确性(EA)得分和 EA 得分的个体内变异性。进行了独立样本 t 检验和 Pearson 相关分析,以分别检查共情的组间差异以及共情与分裂型特质之间的关系。HS 参与者在观看正性和负性视频时的 EA 得分均降低,并且在观看负性视频时的 EA 得分个体内变异性更大。然而,HS 和 LS 参与者在自我报告的认知共情方面没有差异。此外,SPQ 的人际维度与 LS 参与者的 EAT 表现和自我报告的认知共情呈负相关。具有 HS 的个体表现出较差的基于表现的 EA,但自我报告的认知共情相对完整。这项研究为亚临床人群中共情缺陷的发生提供了实证证据,支持对社交认知缺陷进行早期干预。