Liu Xinmin, Li Zhaoxia, Ju Yi, Zhao Xingquan
Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Dec 30;9(6):685-692. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002779.
Acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) typically manifests as isolated dizziness or vertigo with no apparent neurological impairments. However, distinguishing life-threatening stroke from innocuous peripheral vestibular lesions in the emergency room (ER) remains challenging. This study aimed to explore the ability of the head impulse-nystagmus-test of skew (HINTS) combined with truncal ataxia or ABCD score to differentiate stroke from peripheral vestibular disease in patients with AVS in the ER.
We prospectively recruited 121 patients with AVS from December 2022 to June 2023, 69 of whom presented with vestibular neuritis (VN) and the remaining with posterior circulation stroke (PCS). We analysed the HINTS results, truncal ataxia and ABCD score and compared the sensitivity and specificity among HINTS, truncal ataxia, ABCD score and their combinations using the McNemar test for paired samples.
HINTS combined with grade 2-3 truncal ataxia achieved significantly higher sensitivity than that of isolated HINTS in differentiating PCS from VN (100% vs 88.5%, p=0.031). The specificity of HINTS plus grade 2-3 truncal ataxia did not significantly differ from that of isolated HINTS (p=0.125); however, the combination of ABCD score and HINTS did not improve the diagnostic accuracy. The sensitivity of ABCD score ≥4 plus grade 2-3 truncal ataxia was significantly higher than those of isolated ABCD score ≥4 or isolated grade 2-3 truncal ataxia (p=0.016 and p<0.001, respectively) and not significantly lower than that of isolated HINTS (p=0.508).
Compared with the ABCD score, the truncal ataxia is of more valuable assistance to HINTS in differentiating PCS. Although the combination of ABCD score and truncal ataxia has a significant implication, it is not a replacement for HINTS.
急性前庭综合征(AVS)通常表现为孤立性头晕或眩晕,无明显神经功能缺损。然而,在急诊室(ER)中区分危及生命的中风与无害的外周前庭病变仍具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨头部脉冲-眼震-斜视试验(HINTS)联合躯干共济失调或ABCD评分在急诊室中区分急性前庭综合征患者中风与外周前庭疾病的能力。
我们前瞻性招募了2022年12月至2023年6月期间的121例急性前庭综合征患者,其中69例表现为前庭神经炎(VN),其余为后循环卒中(PCS)。我们分析了HINTS结果、躯干共济失调和ABCD评分,并使用配对样本的McNemar检验比较了HINTS、躯干共济失调、ABCD评分及其组合之间的敏感性和特异性。
在区分后循环卒中与前庭神经炎方面,HINTS联合2-3级躯干共济失调的敏感性显著高于单独使用HINTS(100%对88.5%,p=0.031)。HINTS加2-3级躯干共济失调的特异性与单独使用HINTS无显著差异(p=0.125);然而,ABCD评分与HINTS的组合并未提高诊断准确性。ABCD评分≥4加2-3级躯干共济失调的敏感性显著高于单独的ABCD评分≥4或单独的2-3级躯干共济失调(分别为p=0.016和p<0.001),且不显著低于单独使用HINTS(p=0.508)。
与ABCD评分相比,躯干共济失调在辅助HINTS区分后循环卒中方面更具价值。虽然ABCD评分与躯干共济失调的组合具有重要意义,但它不能替代HINTS。