Suppr超能文献

中枢性眼球震颤加 ABCD 评分可识别急性头晕患者的脑卒中。

Central nystagmus plus ABCD identifying stroke in acute dizziness presentations.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Neurology, Chongqing Renji Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;28(10):1118-1123. doi: 10.1111/acem.14295. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to explore the ability of head impulse-nystagmus-test of skew (HINTS) combined with ABCD  score to identify cerebrovascular causes of dizziness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively recruited 85 patients with acute onset of dizziness from September 2016 to December 2018 and analyzed their clinical characteristics, ABCD  scores, HINTS, and neuroimages data.

RESULTS

Acute stroke was identified by MRI in 21 of 85 patients. The mean ± SD ABCD  scores were significantly higher among patients with acute stroke than those without acute stroke (4.0 ± 0.8 h vs. 2.5 ± 0.7 h, p < 0.01). The majority (71.4%) of patients with cerebrovascular causes had central pattern of nystagmus at the initial 48 h from symptoms onset. The sensitivity and specificity of HINTS were 100% and 87% for the presence of stroke in patients with nystagmus. When combined central pattern of nystagmus and ABCD  ≥ 4, the sensitivity increased to 100% for identifying cerebrovascular causes. Nystagmus were absence at time of examination in 16.5% of our patients, and ABCD  scores in patients who had cerebrovascular diagnoses were all ≥ 4.

CONCLUSION

HINTS examinations could efficiently differentiate stroke from nonstroke under the condition that patients remaining symptomatic, including spontaneous or gaze-evoked nystagmus. It is more practical to apply the combination of central pattern of nystagmus and ABCD  ≥ 4 in ED setting. If patients were absence of central nystagmus at admission, cerebrovascular event should be a priority diagnosis when their ABCD  ≥ 4.

摘要

目的

旨在探讨头部脉冲-眼震试验(HINTS)联合 ABCD 评分对识别头晕的脑血管原因的能力。

材料和方法

我们前瞻性地招募了 2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月期间急性起病的头晕患者 85 例,分析了他们的临床特征、ABCD 评分、HINTS 和神经影像学数据。

结果

85 例患者中,MRI 确诊急性脑卒中 21 例。急性脑卒中患者的平均 ABCD 评分明显高于非急性脑卒中患者(4.0±0.8 小时 vs. 2.5±0.7 小时,p<0.01)。大多数(71.4%)脑血管疾病患者在症状出现后 48 小时内出现中央型眼震。对于有眼震的患者,HINTS 的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 87%。当联合中央型眼震和 ABCD 评分≥4 时,对识别脑血管病的敏感性提高到 100%。我们的患者中有 16.5%在检查时无眼震,而有脑血管病诊断的患者的 ABCD 评分均≥4。

结论

在患者仍有症状的情况下,包括自发性或凝视诱发的眼震,HINTS 检查可以有效地将中风与非中风区分开来。在 ED 环境中,更实用的是联合中央型眼震和 ABCD 评分≥4。如果患者入院时无中央型眼震,当 ABCD 评分≥4 时,应优先考虑脑血管事件的诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验