• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延长nivolumab 的给药间隔:未选择癌症患者的基于模型的模拟。

Extending the dosing intervals of nivolumab: model-based simulations in unselected cancer patients.

机构信息

Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Pharmacie de Paris, INSERM UMR-S1144, Paris, France.

Biologie du Médicament - Toxicologie, Cochin University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(11):1866-1874. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02659-x. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-024-02659-x
PMID:38532102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11130267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reducing nivolumab dose intensity could increase patients' life quality and decrease the financial burden while maintaining efficacy. The aims of this study were to develop a population PK model of nivolumab based on data from unselected metastatic cancer patients and to simulate extended-interval regimens allowing to maintain minimal effective plasma concentrations (MEPC).

METHODS

Concentration-time data (992 plasma nivolumab concentrations, 364 patients) were modeled using a two-compartment model with linear elimination clearance in Monolix software. Extended-interval regimens allowing to maintain steady-state trough concentrations (C) above the MEPC of 2.5 mg/L or 1.5 mg/L in >90% of patients were simulated.

RESULTS

Increasing 3-times the dosing interval from 240 mg every two weeks (Q2W) to Q6W and 2-times from 480 mg Q4W to Q8W resulted in C above 2.5 mg/L in 95.8% and 95.4% of patients, respectively. 240 mg Q8W and 480 mg Q10W resulted in C above 1.5 mg/L in 91.0% and 91.8% of patients, respectively. Selection of a 240 mg Q6W regimen would decrease by 3-fold the annual treatment costs compared to standard regimen of 240 mg Q2W (from 78,744€ to 26,248€ in France).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials are warranted to confirm the non-inferiority of extended-interval compared to standard regimen.

摘要

背景

降低纳武利尤单抗的剂量强度可以提高患者的生活质量,减轻经济负担,同时保持疗效。本研究旨在建立一个基于未经选择的转移性癌症患者数据的纳武利尤单抗群体药代动力学模型,并模拟延长间隔方案,以维持最小有效血浆浓度(MEPC)。

方法

使用 Monolix 软件中的两室模型和线性消除清除率对浓度-时间数据(992 个纳武利尤单抗血浆浓度,364 名患者)进行建模。模拟了延长间隔方案,使稳态谷浓度(C)维持在 2.5mg/L 或 1.5mg/L 以上,超过 90%的患者。

结果

将每 2 周 240mg 的给药间隔增加 3 倍至 Q6W 和将每 4 周 480mg 的给药间隔增加 2 倍至 Q8W,分别使 95.8%和 95.4%的患者 C 超过 2.5mg/L。240mg Q8W 和 480mg Q10W 分别使 91.0%和 91.8%的患者 C 超过 1.5mg/L。与标准的 240mg Q2W 方案相比,选择 240mg Q6W 方案将使每年的治疗费用降低 3 倍(从法国的 78744 欧元降至 26248 欧元)。

结论

需要进行临床试验以确认延长间隔与标准方案相比的非劣效性。

相似文献

1
Extending the dosing intervals of nivolumab: model-based simulations in unselected cancer patients.延长nivolumab 的给药间隔:未选择癌症患者的基于模型的模拟。
Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(11):1866-1874. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02659-x. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer.评估癌症患者每 4 周使用 480mg nivolumab 平剂量方案的药物暴露情况和临床安全性。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2208-2213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy408.
3
Model-informed drug development approach supporting approval of the 4-week (Q4W) dosing schedule for nivolumab (Opdivo) across multiple indications: a regulatory perspective.基于模型的药物研发方法支持批准纳武利尤单抗(欧狄沃)在多个适应证中采用 4 周(Q4W)给药方案:监管视角。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):644-651. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz037.
4
A six-weekly dosing schedule for pembrolizumab in patients with cancer based on evaluation using modelling and simulation.基于建模和模拟评估的癌症患者每六周一次的帕博利珠单抗给药方案。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;131:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Utilization and toxicity patterns of 2-weekly (Q2W) versus 4-weekly (Q4W) nivolumab for treatment of adjuvant and metastatic melanoma at BC cancer.BC 癌症中心辅助治疗和转移性黑色素瘤采用 2 周(Q2W)和 4 周(Q4W)纳武利尤单抗治疗的应用和毒性模式。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2024 Sep;30(6):1016-1022. doi: 10.1177/10781552231199048. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
Model-based population pharmacokinetic and exposure response analyses for safety and efficacy of nivolumab as adjuvant treatment in subjects with resected oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.纳武利尤单抗作为食管或胃食管交界癌切除术后辅助治疗的安全性和有效性的基于模型的群体药代动力学和暴露反应分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;90(11):2920-2930. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16188. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
7
Population pharmacokinetics analysis of nivolumab in Asian and non-Asian patients with gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancers.亚洲和非亚洲胃癌和胃食管交界处癌患者纳武利尤单抗的群体药代动力学分析。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;83(4):705-715. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03771-z. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Benefit-risk assessment of nivolumab 240 mg flat dose relative to 3 mg/kg Q2W regimen in Japanese patients with advanced cancers.纳武利尤单抗 240mg 固定剂量与 3mg/kgQ2W 方案治疗日本晚期癌症患者的获益-风险评估。
Cancer Sci. 2020 Feb;111(2):528-535. doi: 10.1111/cas.14252. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
Model-based simulation to support the extended dosing regimens of atezolizumab.基于模型的模拟支持阿替利珠单抗的扩展给药方案。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;77(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02980-3. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
10
Therapeutic drug monitoring of nivolumab in routine clinical practice. A pilot study.尼伏单抗在常规临床实践中的治疗药物监测。一项试点研究。
Farm Hosp. 2020 Apr 17;44(3):81-86. doi: 10.7399/fh.11319.

引用本文的文献

1
Eco Friendly and Budget Smart: An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.生态友好且预算明智:替代PD-1和PD-L1抑制剂给药方案的经济与环境评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01535-7.
2
Heterogenous treatment effect of neuromuscular blocking agents for moderate-to-severe ARDS: a post hoc Markov model re-analysis of the ACURASYS trial.神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的异质性治疗效果:ACURASYS试验的事后马尔可夫模型再分析
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08064-z.
3
Does one model fit all mAbs? An evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models.一个模型能适用于所有单克隆抗体吗?群体药代动力学模型评估。
MAbs. 2025 Dec;17(1):2512217. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2512217. Epub 2025 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Killing a fly with a sledgehammer: Atezolizumab exposure in real-world lung cancer patients.大材小用:阿替利珠单抗在真实世界肺癌患者中的暴露情况。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;12(11):1795-1803. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13063.
2
Interventional pharmacoeconomics for immune checkpoint inhibitors through alternative dosing strategies.通过改变给药策略进行免疫检查点抑制剂的介入药物经济学
Br J Cancer. 2023 Oct;129(9):1389-1396. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02367-y. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
A non-inferiority randomized phase III trial of standard immunotherapy by checkpoint inhibitors vs. reduced dose intensity in responding patients with metastatic cancer: the MOIO protocol study.标准免疫疗法(免疫检查点抑制剂)与转移性癌症应答患者的低剂量强度比较的非劣效性随机 III 期试验:MOIO 方案研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 2;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10881-8.
4
In Silico Re-Optimization of Atezolizumab Dosing Using Population Pharmacokinetic Simulation and Exposure-Response Simulation.基于群体药代动力学模拟和暴露-反应模拟的阿替利珠单抗再优化剂量的计算机仿真研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;63(6):672-680. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2203. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
REFINE (REduced Frequency ImmuNE checkpoint inhibition in cancers): A multi-arm phase II basket trial testing reduced intensity immunotherapy across different cancers.REFINE(癌症中降低频率的免疫检查点抑制):一项多臂二期篮子试验,在不同癌症中测试降低强度的免疫治疗。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jan;124:107030. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107030. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
6
Low-Dose Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Study.头颈部癌的低剂量免疫疗法:一项随机研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):222-232. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01015. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
7
Optimizing the dose and schedule of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer to allow global access.优化癌症免疫检查点抑制剂的剂量和给药方案以实现全球可及。
Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2236-2237. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02029-1.
8
Durable disease control and refractory bullous pemphigoid after immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A case report.转移性肾细胞癌患者停用免疫检查点抑制剂后疾病持久控制且并发难治性大疱性类天疱疮:一例报告。
Front Immunol. 2022 Sep 16;13:984132. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.984132. eCollection 2022.
9
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors: long-term implications of toxicity.免疫检查点抑制剂:毒性的长期影响。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr;19(4):254-267. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00600-w. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
10
Dose Optimization of Pembrolizumab: Less May Be More.帕博利珠单抗的剂量优化:少或许更好。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 May;111(5):993. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2490. Epub 2021 Dec 1.