Suppr超能文献

挪威养老院和急诊护理机构之间不必要和必要转移的共识领域:一项德尔菲研究。

Areas of consensus on unwarranted and warranted transfers between nursing homes and emergency care facilities in Norway: a Delphi study.

机构信息

Centre for Care Research, West. Western, Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10879-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transferring residents from nursing homes (NHs) to emergency care facilities (ECFs) is often questioned as many are terminally ill and have access to onsite care. While some NH to ECF transfers have merit, avoiding other transfers may benefit residents and reduce healthcare system costs and provider burden. Despite many years of research in this area, differentiating warranted (i.e., appropriate) from unwarranted NH to ECF transfers remains challenging. In this article, we report consensus on warranted and unwarranted NH to ECF transfers scenarios.

METHODS

A Delphi study was used to identify consensus regarding warranted and unwarranted NH to ECF transfers. Delphi participants included nurses (RNs) and medical doctors (MDs) from NHs, out-of-hours primary care clinics (OOHs), and hospital-based emergency departments. A list of 12 scenarios and 11 medical conditions was generated from the existing literature on causes and medical conditions leading to transfers, and pilot tested and refined prior to conducting the study. Three Delphi rounds were conducted, and data were analyzed using descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine experts consented to participate, of whom 56 (71%) completed all three Delphi rounds. Participants reached high or very high consensus on when to not transfer residents, except for scenarios regarding delirium, where only moderate consensus was attained. Conversely, except when pain relieving surgery was required, participants reached low agreement on scenarios depicting warranted NH to ECF transfers. Consensus opinions differ significantly between health professionals, participant gender, and rurality, for seven of the 23 transfer scenarios and medical conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfers from nursing homes to emergency care facilities can be defined as warranted, discretionary, and unwarranted. These categories are based on the areas of consensus found in this Delphi study and are intended to operationalize the terms warranted and unwarranted transfers between nursing homes and emergency care facilities.

摘要

背景

将居民从养老院(NH)转移到急诊护理机构(ECF)经常受到质疑,因为许多人患有绝症,并且可以获得现场护理。虽然一些 NH 到 ECF 的转移是有价值的,但避免其他转移可能对居民有益,并降低医疗保健系统的成本和提供者的负担。尽管在这一领域进行了多年的研究,但区分有正当理由(即适当)和无正当理由的 NH 到 ECF 的转移仍然具有挑战性。在本文中,我们报告了对有正当理由和无正当理由的 NH 到 ECF 转移情况的共识。

方法

使用 Delphi 研究来确定对有正当理由和无正当理由的 NH 到 ECF 转移的共识。Delphi 参与者包括来自 NH、非工作时间初级保健诊所(OOH)和医院急诊部的护士(RN)和医生(MD)。从导致转移的原因和医疗状况的现有文献中生成了 12 种情景和 11 种医疗状况的列表,并在进行研究之前进行了试点测试和完善。进行了三轮 Delphi 研究,使用描述性和比较性统计数据对数据进行了分析。

结果

79 名专家同意参与,其中 56 名(71%)完成了所有三轮 Delphi 研究。参与者对何时不转移居民达成了高度或非常高的共识,除了关于谵妄的情景外,仅达成了中度共识。相反,除了需要缓解疼痛的手术外,参与者对描绘有正当理由的 NH 到 ECF 转移的情景达成了低共识。对于 23 个转移情景和医疗状况中的七个,卫生专业人员、参与者的性别和农村性之间的共识意见存在显著差异。

结论

从养老院到急诊护理机构的转移可以定义为有正当理由、自由裁量和无正当理由。这些类别基于 Delphi 研究中发现的共识领域,旨在使养老院和急诊护理机构之间的有正当理由和无正当理由的转移术语具体化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a59/10964583/99c1bdc08de8/12913_2024_10879_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验