Suppr超能文献

比较有无鼻塞患者梨状孔前后鼻腔气道的 CT 表现。

CT comparison of the nasal airway anterior and posterior to the piriform aperture in patients with and without nasal obstruction.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, 6020, +435050423141, Austria.

Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2024 Mar 27;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00420-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasal airway stenosis may lie anterior and/or posterior to the piriform aperture. We intended to compare the nasal airway anterior and posterior to the piriform aperture in patients with and without nasal obstruction.

METHODS

Segmented computed tomography cross-sectional areas of the nasal airway anterior (CT-CSA) and posterior to the piriform aperture (at the level of the head of the inferior turbinate; CT-CSA) were compared between patients with nasal obstruction (cases) and trauma controls. CT-CSA were approximately perpendicular to the direction of the nasal airflow. Anterior to the piriform aperture, they were tilted about 30, 60 and 90 to the nasal floor. Posterior to the piriform aperture, they were tilted about 50, 80 and 100 to the nasal floor. In cases, we examined the Pearson's correlation of active anterior rhinomanometry with CT-CSA and CT-CSA.

RESULTS

Narrow and bilateral CT-CSA were similarly large between 56 cases and 56 controls (all p > 0.2). On the contrary, narrow and bilateral CT-CSA were significantly smaller in cases than in controls (all p < 0.001). The ratio of the size of CT-CSA to that of CT-CSA was significantly lower in cases (median: 0.84; lower to upper quartile: 0.55-1.13) than in controls (1.0; 0.88-1.16; Mann-Whitney U test; p = 0.006). Bilateral CT-CSA correlated significantly with total inspiratory flow (all p < 0.026) in contrast to bilateral CT-CSA (all p > 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

The nasal airway anterior to the piriform aperture was smaller in patients with nasal obstruction due to skeletal nasal stenosis than that in controls. On the contrary, the nasal airway posterior to the piriform aperture was similarly large between patients with and without nasal obstruction. Furthermore, in patients with nasal obstruction, the anterior nasal airway was narrower compared to that located posterior to it. On the contrary, control patients' anterior nasal airway was as large as the posterior one.

摘要

背景

鼻气道狭窄可能位于梨状孔的前方和/或后方。我们旨在比较有和无鼻塞患者梨状孔前后的鼻气道。

方法

比较有鼻塞(病例)和创伤对照组患者梨状孔前后的鼻气道(梨状孔水平下鼻甲头部;CT-CSA)的分段 CT 横断面面积。CT-CSA 大致垂直于鼻气流方向。在梨状孔前方,它们相对于鼻底倾斜约 30、60 和 90。在梨状孔后方,它们相对于鼻底倾斜约 50、80 和 100。在病例中,我们检查了主动前鼻测压术与 CT-CSA 和 CT-CSA 的 Pearson 相关性。

结果

56 例病例和 56 例对照的狭窄且双侧 CT-CSA 大小相似(均 p>0.2)。相反,病例的狭窄且双侧 CT-CSA明显小于对照组(均 p<0.001)。病例的 CT-CSA 大小与 CT-CSA 大小的比值明显低于对照组(中位数:0.84;下四分位数到上四分位数:0.55-1.13)(Mann-Whitney U 检验;p=0.006)。双侧 CT-CSA 与总吸气流量显著相关(均 p<0.026),而双侧 CT-CSA 则相反(均 p>0.056)。

结论

由于骨骼性鼻狭窄,有鼻塞的患者梨状孔前方的鼻气道比对照组小。相反,有和无鼻塞患者的梨状孔后方的鼻气道大小相似。此外,在有鼻塞的患者中,前鼻气道比位于其后的气道更窄。相反,对照组患者的前鼻气道与后鼻气道一样大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13dd/10967109/b5e4cc664b3c/13005_2024_420_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验