• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗老年结直肠恶性肿瘤的疗效评价:单中心回顾性分析。

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Among Elderly Individuals With Colorectal Malignancy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Jun 1;34(3):281-289. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001281.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001281
PMID:38533893
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to statistically clarify the precise risk age in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal resection in these patients.

METHODS

Patients' clinical variables were extracted from the database of the Gastrointestinal Surgery Centre, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, from 2015 to 2019. Logistic regression was conducted to identify independent risk factors of postoperative complications and ORs for each age. Curves of odds ratios (ORs) and CIs for each age were fitted by using a locally weighted scatterplot smoother, and a structural breakpoint was determined by the Chow test to identify a precise cutoff risk age for elderly patients. Comparison and subgroup analysis were conducted between surgical approach groups using the Student t test and χ 2 analysis.

RESULTS

Locally weighted scatterplot smoother OR analysis manifested that patients aged 69 years old or older suffered a higher possibility of postoperative complications and should be defined as high-risk age. Comparison according to the high-risk age revealed laparoscopic colorectal surgery is better than laparotomic surgery for elderly individuals in terms of hospital stay (9.46 ± 5.96 vs 15.01 ± 6.34, P < 0.05), the incidence of intensive care unit transfer (4 vs 20, P < 0.05), and incidence of surgical site infection (15 vs 20, P < 0.05). Patients who underwent laparotomic surgery had a greater prevalence of Clavien-Dindo II/III complications ( P < 0.05). These findings remained stable even after propensity matching. Furthermore, such superiority was proved especially significant for patients who underwent left-side colorectal resection. In addition, overall survival was improved in the laparoscopic surgery group, whereas no differences were observed in disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

In our study population, age 69 or older was a cutoff point age suggests a higher possibility of postoperative morbidity after colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic colorectal resection should be regarded as a superior therapeutic choice for these elderly individuals, especially for left-side colorectal surgeries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过统计学方法明确行结直肠手术的老年患者的确切风险年龄,并评估腹腔镜结直肠切除术在这些患者中的安全性和疗效。

方法

从中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科中心数据库中提取 2015 年至 2019 年患者的临床变量。采用 logistic 回归分析识别术后并发症的独立危险因素,以及各年龄组的优势比(OR)。采用局部加权散点平滑法拟合优势比(OR)和置信区间(CI)曲线,通过 Chow 检验确定老年患者的精确风险年龄分界点。采用 t 检验和 χ 2 分析比较手术方式组之间的差异和亚组分析。

结果

局部加权散点平滑法 OR 分析显示,年龄 69 岁或以上的患者术后并发症的可能性更高,应定义为高危年龄。根据高危年龄进行比较显示,腹腔镜结直肠手术在住院时间(9.46 ± 5.96 比 15.01 ± 6.34,P < 0.05)、重症监护病房转移发生率(4 比 20,P < 0.05)和手术部位感染发生率(15 比 20,P < 0.05)方面优于剖腹手术。行剖腹手术的患者更易发生 Clavien-Dindo II/III 级并发症(P < 0.05)。即使在倾向评分匹配后,这些发现仍然稳定。此外,这种优势在接受左侧结直肠切除术的患者中更为显著。此外,腹腔镜手术组的总生存率得到提高,而无病生存率无差异。

结论

在本研究人群中,年龄 69 岁或以上是结直肠手术后发生术后发病率较高的截点年龄。对于这些老年患者,腹腔镜结直肠切除术应作为一种更好的治疗选择,尤其是对于左侧结直肠手术。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Among Elderly Individuals With Colorectal Malignancy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗老年结直肠恶性肿瘤的疗效评价:单中心回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Jun 1;34(3):281-289. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001281.
2
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术的短期益处。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.子宫肌瘤的微创手术技术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 21;2014(10):CD004638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Surgical Procedures as Predictors of Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-Emergency Colorectal Cancer Surgery.手术方式作为老年非急诊结直肠癌手术患者术后结局的预测因素
Ann Ital Chir. 2025;96(6):800-810. doi: 10.62713/aic.3919.