• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光诱导激波作用于大鼠脑组织后的脑膜损伤和界面星形胶质瘢痕形成。

Meningeal Damage and Interface Astroglial Scarring in the Rat Brain Exposed to a Laser-Induced Shock Wave(s).

机构信息

Division of Bioinformation and Therapeutic Systems, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.

Defence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2024 Aug;41(15-16):e2039-e2053. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0572. Epub 2024 May 8.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0572
PMID:38534205
Abstract

In the past decade, signature clinical neuropathology of blast-induced traumatic brain injury has been under intense debate, but interface astroglial scarring (IAS) seems to be convincing. In this study, we examined whether IAS could be replicated in the rat brain exposed to a laser-induced shock wave(s) (LISW[s]), a tool that can produce a pure shock wave (primary mechanism) without dynamic pressure (tertiary mechanism). Under certain conditions, we observed astroglial scarring in the subpial glial plate (SGP), gray-white matter junctions (GM-WM), ventricular wall (VW), and regions surrounding cortical blood vessels, accurately reproducing clinical IAS. We also observed shock wave impulse-dependent meningeal damage (dural microhemorrhage) by transcranial near-infrared (NIR) reflectance imaging. Importantly, there were significant correlations between the degree of dural microhemorrhage and the extent of astroglial scarring more than 7 days post-exposure, suggesting an association of meningeal damage with astroglial scarring. The results demonstrated that the primary mechanism alone caused the IAS and meningeal damage, both of which are attributable to acoustic impedance mismatching at multi-layered tissue boundaries. The time course of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunoreactivity depended not only on the LISW conditions but also on the regions. In the SGP, significant increases in GFAP immunoreactivity were observed at 3 days post-exposure, whereas in the GM-WM and VW, GFAP immunoreactivity was not significantly increased before 28 days post-exposure, suggesting different pathological mechanisms. With the high-impulse single exposure or the multiple exposure (low impulse), fibrotic reaction or fibrotic scar formation was observed, in addition to astroglial scarring, in the cortical surface region. Although there are some limitations, this seems to be the first report on the shock-wave-induced IAS rodent model. The model may be useful to explore potential therapeutic approaches for IAS.

摘要

在过去的十年中,爆炸引起的创伤性脑损伤的特征性临床神经病理学一直存在激烈的争论,但界面星形胶质瘢痕(IAS)似乎令人信服。在这项研究中,我们研究了激光诱导冲击波(LISW)暴露的大鼠脑中是否可以复制 IAS,这种工具可以产生纯冲击波(主要机制)而没有动压(三级机制)。在某些条件下,我们观察到在软脑膜下胶质层(SGP)、灰质-白质交界处(GM-WM)、脑室壁(VW)和皮质血管周围区域出现星形胶质瘢痕,准确地再现了临床 IAS。我们还通过颅穿透近红外(NIR)反射成像观察到冲击波脉冲依赖性脑膜损伤(硬脑膜微出血)。重要的是,暴露后 7 天以上,脑膜微出血的程度与星形胶质瘢痕的程度之间存在显著相关性,表明脑膜损伤与星形胶质瘢痕有关。结果表明,仅主要机制就会导致 IAS 和脑膜损伤,这两者都是由于多层组织边界的声阻抗不匹配引起的。胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)免疫反应的时间进程不仅取决于 LISW 条件,还取决于区域。在 SGP 中,暴露后 3 天观察到 GFAP 免疫反应显著增加,而在 GM-WM 和 VW 中,暴露后 28 天前 GFAP 免疫反应没有明显增加,这表明存在不同的病理机制。高脉冲单次暴露或多次(低脉冲)暴露除了星形胶质瘢痕外,在皮质表面区域还观察到纤维反应或纤维瘢痕形成。虽然存在一些限制,但这似乎是第一个关于冲击波诱导的 IAS 啮齿动物模型的报告。该模型可能有助于探索 IAS 的潜在治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Meningeal Damage and Interface Astroglial Scarring in the Rat Brain Exposed to a Laser-Induced Shock Wave(s).激光诱导激波作用于大鼠脑组织后的脑膜损伤和界面星形胶质瘢痕形成。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Aug;41(15-16):e2039-e2053. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0572. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Characterisation of interface astroglial scarring in the human brain after blast exposure: a post-mortem case series.爆震暴露后人脑界面星形胶质瘢痕的特征:一项尸检病例系列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Aug;15(9):944-953. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30057-6. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Mild neurotrauma indicates a range-specific pressure response to low level shock wave exposure.轻度神经外伤表明在特定范围内,压力对低水平冲击波暴露的反应。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Jan;40(1):227-36. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0420-4. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
Characteristics of laser-induced shock wave injury to the inner ear of rats.激光诱导大鼠内耳冲击波损伤的特征
J Biomed Opt. 2014 Dec;19(12):125001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.12.125001.
5
Effects of Isolated and Combined Exposure of the Brain and Lungs to a Laser-Induced Shock Wave(s) on Physiological and Neurological Responses in Rats.脑和肺单独及联合暴露于激光诱导冲击波对大鼠生理和神经反应的影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Nov;39(21-22):1533-1546. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0101. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Behavioral and Histopathological Impairments Caused by Topical Exposure of the Rat Brain to Mild-Impulse Laser-Induced Shock Waves: Impulse Dependency.大鼠脑部局部暴露于弱脉冲激光诱导的冲击波所引起的行为和组织病理学损伤:脉冲依赖性
Front Neurol. 2021 May 21;12:621546. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.621546. eCollection 2021.
7
A multi-mode shock tube for investigation of blast-induced traumatic brain injury.一种用于研究爆炸致颅脑创伤的多模式激波管。
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jan;28(1):95-104. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1513.
8
RNAi-mediated ephrin-B2 silencing attenuates astroglial-fibrotic scar formation and improves spinal cord axon growth.RNAi 介导的 Ephrin-B2 沉默减弱星形胶质细胞-纤维瘢痕形成并促进脊髓轴突生长。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2017 Oct;23(10):779-789. doi: 10.1111/cns.12723. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
9
Axonal damage and behavioral deficits in rats with repetitive exposure of the brain to laser-induced shock waves: Effects of inter-exposure time.脑重复激光冲击波暴露致轴索损伤及行为学缺陷:暴露间隔时间的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Apr 1;749:135722. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135722. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
10
Relationship between orientation to a blast and pressure wave propagation inside the rat brain.大鼠脑内定向冲击波与压力波传播的关系。
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 30;195(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.11.019. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroinflammation at the Gray-White Matter Interface in Active-Duty U.S. Special Operations Forces.美国现役特种作战部队灰白质交界处的神经炎症
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 Dec 16;5(1):1205-1211. doi: 10.1089/neur.2024.0116. eCollection 2024.