• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年度对比性腹疝复发率及危险因素。

Year-Over-Year Ventral Hernia Recurrence Rates and Risk Factors.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Jun 1;159(6):651-658. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0233.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0233
PMID:38536183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10974689/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Recurrence is one of the most challenging adverse events after ventral hernia repair as it impacts quality of life, utilization of resources, and subsequent need for re-repair. Rates of recurrence range from 30% to 80% after ventral hernia repair.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the contemporary ventral hernia recurrence rate over time in patients with previous hernia repair and to determine risk factors associated with recurrence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, population-based study used the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry to evaluate year-over-year recurrence rates in patients with prior ventral hernia repair between January 2012 and August 2022. Patients who underwent at least 1 prior ventral hernia repair were included and categorized into 2 groups based on mesh or no-mesh use. There were 43 960 eligible patients; after exclusion criteria (patients with concurrent inguinal hernias as the primary diagnosis, nonstandard hernia procedure categories, American Society of Anesthesiologists class unassigned, or no follow-up), 29 834 patients were analyzed in the mesh group and 5599 in the no-mesh group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Ventral hernia recurrence rates. Risk factors analyzed include age, body mass index, sex, race, insurance type, medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, indication for surgery, concomitant procedure, hernia procedure type, myofascial release, fascial closure, fixation type, number of prior repairs, hernia width, hernia length, mesh width, mesh length, operative approach, prior mesh placement, prior mesh infection, mesh location, mesh type, postoperative surgical site occurrence, postoperative surgical site infection, postoperative seroma, use of drains, and reoperation.

RESULTS

Among 29 834 patients with mesh, the mean (SD) age was 57.17 (13.36) years, and 14 331 participants (48.0%) were female. Among 5599 patients without mesh, the mean (SD) age was 51.9 (15.31) years, and 2458 participants (43.9%) were female. When comparing year-over-year hernia recurrence rates in patients with and without prior mesh repair, respectively, the Kaplan Meier analysis showed a recurrence rate of 201 cumulative events with 13 872 at risk (2.8%) vs 104 cumulative events with 1707 at risk (4.0%) at 6 months; 411 cumulative events with 4732 at risk (8.0%) vs 184 cumulative events with 427 at risk (32.6%) at 1 year; 640 cumulative events with 1518 at risk (19.7%) vs 243 cumulative events with 146 at risk (52.4%) at 2 years; 731 cumulative events with 670 at risk (29.3%) vs 258 cumulative events with 73 at risk (61.4%) at 3 years; 777 cumulative events with 337 at risk (38.5%) vs 267 cumulative events with 29 at risk (71.2%) at 4 years; and 798 cumulative events with 171 at risk (44.9%) vs 269 cumulative events with 19 at risk (73.7%) at 5 years. Higher body mass index; immunosuppressants; incisional and parastomal hernias; a robotic approach; greater hernia width; use of a biologic or resorbable synthetic mesh; and complications, such as surgical site infections and reoperation, were associated with higher odds of hernia recurrence. Conversely, greater mesh width, myofascial release, and fascial closure had lower odds of recurrence. Hernia type was the most important variable associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the 5-year recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair was greater than 40% and 70% in patients with and without mesh, respectively. Rates of ventral hernia recurrence increased over time, underscoring the importance of close, long-term follow up in this population.

摘要

重要性

腹疝修补术后复发是最具挑战性的不良事件之一,因为它会影响生活质量、资源利用以及随后再次修复的需要。腹疝修补术后复发率为 30%至 80%。

目的

确定既往疝修补术后患者腹疝复发的当代复发率,并确定与复发相关的风险因素。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性、基于人群的研究使用腹部核心健康质量协作登记处,评估 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间既往腹疝修补术后患者逐年复发率。纳入至少有 1 次既往腹疝修补术的患者,并根据使用网片或不使用网片将患者分为两组。共纳入 43960 例符合条件的患者;排除标准为(同期腹股沟疝为主要诊断、非标准疝手术类别、美国麻醉医师协会分类未指定或无随访)后,29834 例患者纳入网片组,5599 例患者纳入无网片组。

主要结局和措施

腹疝复发率。分析的风险因素包括年龄、体重指数、性别、种族、保险类型、合并症、美国麻醉医师协会分类、吸烟、手术指征、同时进行的手术、疝手术类型、筋膜松解术、筋膜闭合术、固定类型、既往修复次数、疝宽度、疝长度、网片宽度、网片长度、手术入路、既往网片放置、既往网片感染、网片位置、网片类型、术后手术部位并发症、术后手术部位感染、术后血清肿、引流管使用和再次手术。

结果

在 29834 例网片组患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 57.17(13.36)岁,14331 例(48.0%)为女性。在 5599 例无网片组患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 51.9(15.31)岁,2458 例(43.9%)为女性。分别比较有和无既往网片修补术患者的年复发性疝发生率,Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,在 6 个月时,分别有 13872 例(2.8%)和 1707 例(4.0%)患者有 201 例累计事件和 104 例累计事件发生复发;在 1 年时,分别有 4732 例(8.0%)和 427 例(32.6%)患者有 411 例累计事件和 184 例累计事件发生复发;在 2 年时,分别有 1518 例(19.7%)和 427 例(52.4%)患者有 640 例累计事件和 243 例累计事件发生复发;在 3 年时,分别有 670 例(29.3%)和 427 例(61.4%)患者有 731 例累计事件和 258 例累计事件发生复发;在 4 年时,分别有 337 例(38.5%)和 427 例(71.2%)患者有 777 例累计事件和 267 例累计事件发生复发;在 5 年时,分别有 171 例(44.9%)和 427 例(73.7%)患者有 798 例累计事件和 269 例累计事件发生复发。更高的体重指数;免疫抑制剂;切口疝和造口旁疝;机器人手术方法;更大的疝宽度;使用生物或可吸收合成网片;以及手术部位感染和再次手术等并发症与更高的疝复发几率相关。相反,更大的网片宽度、筋膜松解术和筋膜闭合术降低了复发的几率。疝类型是与复发最相关的最重要变量。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,腹疝修补术后 5 年复发率在有网片和无网片的患者中分别大于 40%和 70%。腹疝复发率随时间增加,突出了在该人群中进行密切、长期随访的重要性。

相似文献

1
Year-Over-Year Ventral Hernia Recurrence Rates and Risk Factors.年度对比性腹疝复发率及危险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jun 1;159(6):651-658. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0233.
2
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Ten-year outcomes following ventral hernia repair: making the case for better post-market surveillance in the USA.腹外疝修补术后 10 年的结果:呼吁更好地进行美国上市后监测。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5612-5622. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09725-6. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
4
Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Single-stage Repair of Contaminated Ventral Hernias: A Randomized Clinical Trial.生物补片与合成补片一期修复污染性腹壁切口疝的随机对照临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2022 Apr 1;157(4):293-301. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6902.
5
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair With Intraperitoneal Mesh: The PROVE-IT Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术治疗腹壁疝的患者报告结局:PROVE-IT 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):22-29. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4569.
7
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
8
Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.择期原发性腹疝修补术采用合成网片与缝线修复的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2014 May;149(5):415-21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014.
9
A comparison of outcomes and cost in VHWG grade II hernias between Rives-Stoppa synthetic mesh hernia repair versus underlay biologic mesh repair.Rives-Stoppa合成网片疝修补术与底层生物网片修补术治疗VHWG II级疝的疗效及成本比较。
Hernia. 2014;18(6):781-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1309-6. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
10
Evaluation of port site hernias, chronic pain and recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a monocentric long-term study.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术后切口疝、慢性疼痛及复发率的评估:一项单中心长期研究
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):917-923. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1663-2. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
To infinity and beyond: the promise of data-driven 3D printing of hernia mesh - a primer for surgeons.飞向无限,超越想象:数据驱动的疝修补网片3D打印的前景——外科医生入门指南
Hernia. 2025 Sep 1;29(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03434-4.
2
A novel classification system for hernia recurrence after hernia repair: A call to standardize hernia recurrence nomenclature and severity classification.一种用于疝修补术后疝复发的新型分类系统:呼吁规范疝复发的命名和严重程度分类。
Hernia. 2025 Aug 29;29(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03432-6.
3
Evaluating the impact of diastasis recti on ipom plus ventral hernia repair.评估腹直肌分离对IPOM加腹疝修补术的影响。
Hernia. 2025 Aug 14;29(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03451-3.
4
Evaluating the Impact of Diabetes on Hernia Management by Exploring Pathologies and Comorbidities in High-Risk Patients.通过探究高危患者的病理情况和合并症来评估糖尿病对疝气治疗的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 19;17(6):e86329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86329. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Does BMI Impact Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体重指数对接受开放性腹壁重建手术患者的预后有影响吗?一项系统评价与Meta分析
World J Surg. 2025 Jul;49(7):1777-1786. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12649. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
6
Comparing robotic ventral transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rvTAPP) and laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP): a multicentre observational study.机器人经腹腹膜前修补术(rvTAPP)与腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外修补术(eTEP)的比较:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(1):282. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02443-w.
7
Risk factors for recurrence after open neonatal hernia repair: A single-center, retrospective study.新生儿开放性疝修补术后复发的危险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):103151. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103151.
8
Biomechanics of the abdominal wall before and after ventral hernia repair using dynamic MRI.使用动态磁共振成像评估腹疝修补术前和术后腹壁的生物力学
Hernia. 2025 May 24;29(1):185. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03337-4.
9
Effectiveness of pre-operative chemical component separation with computed tomography-guided intramuscular injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA in outcomes of large complex incisional ventral abdominal hernia repair: a propensity score-weighted comparative analysis.计算机断层扫描引导下肌内注射奥曲肽毒素A进行术前化学成分分离对大型复杂切口疝修补术结局的有效性:倾向评分加权比较分析
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03369-w.
10
Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.网状缝线植入后的结果:1111例患者的登记研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 May 20;13(5):e6766. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006766. eCollection 2025 May.