Young Edward, Lawson James, Karatassas Alex, Hensman Chrys
Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The Basil Hetzel Institute, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia.
Hernia. 2025 Sep 1;29(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03434-4.
PURPOSE: Abdominal wall hernias account for a substantial operative caseload in general surgery globally. Optimal hernia care should be tailored to individual circumstances. To repair the three-dimensional (3D) abdominal wall, 3D-printed patient-specific implants may be superior to current mesh products. The aim was to review the current state of 3D printing technology in custom hernia mesh production, and its safety and efficacy for tailored hernia care. METHODS: A literature search within PubMed and Scopus databases were performed in March 2025, in accordance to PRISMA-ScR framework, using keyword combinations of printing, mesh, hernia, safety, efficacy and their derivatives. Full-text papers relevant to the study aim in all formats and languages were included, and risk of bias assessment was performed. The review was not eligible for registration with PROSPERO. Papers were grouped by general theme, and a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Thirty relevant papers were identified from 14,210 abstracts. Literature on 3D-printed hernia mesh was sparse, with majority of papers being preclinical. General focus of the literature was production, cellular toxicity, performance of adjuncts and short-term tolerance in small animals. Risk of bias was globally high to critical, due to underreporting of in vitro and in vivo methodology. Safety and clinical efficacy of 3D-printed mesh remained unknown. Numerous issues, including production, sterilisation and regulations, were identified and discussed. CONCLUSION: 3D-printed hernia mesh is the next step towards tailored hernia care, with significant potential not otherwise available with traditional mesh products. Substantial research is still required to clarify its safety and efficacy.
目的:腹壁疝在全球普通外科手术病例中占相当大的比例。最佳的疝治疗应根据个体情况进行定制。为修复三维腹壁,3D打印的个性化植入物可能优于目前的网片产品。本研究旨在综述3D打印技术在定制疝修补网片生产中的现状及其在个性化疝治疗中的安全性和有效性。 方法:按照PRISMA-ScR框架,于2025年3月在PubMed和Scopus数据库中进行文献检索,使用“打印”“网片”“疝”“安全性”“有效性”及其衍生词的关键词组合。纳入所有格式和语言的与研究目的相关的全文论文,并进行偏倚风险评估。本综述不符合在PROSPERO注册的条件。论文按一般主题分组,并进行叙述性综合分析。 结果:从14210篇摘要中筛选出30篇相关论文。关于3D打印疝修补网片的文献稀少,大多数论文为临床前研究。文献的总体重点是生产、细胞毒性、辅助材料的性能以及小动物的短期耐受性。由于体外和体内方法报告不足,全球偏倚风险较高至严重。3D打印网片的安全性和临床疗效仍不明确。识别并讨论了许多问题,包括生产、灭菌和法规等。 结论:3D打印疝修补网片是迈向个性化疝治疗的下一步,具有传统网片产品无法比拟的巨大潜力。仍需要大量研究来阐明其安全性和有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-7-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-9-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-2-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-11-27
J Hand Microsurg. 2025-5-19
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025-8-1
Bioinformation. 2024-11-30
J Minim Access Surg. 2025-1-1