Suppr超能文献

增强肿胀吸脂术的安全性:在异丙酚-氯胺酮方案下深度镇静时管理与镇静相关的呼吸问题和严重并发症。

Enhancing Safety in Tumescent Liposuction: Managing Sedation-Related Respiratory Issues and Serious Complications Under Deep Sedation with the Propofol-Ketamine Protocol.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry Education, Daegu University, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongbuk, 38453, South Korea.

Liposuction Center, 365mc Hospital, Busanjin-gu, Busan, 47286, South Korea.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(10):1964-1976. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03963-w. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past 4 years, aesthetic surgery, notably liposuction, has substantially increased. Tumescent liposuction, a popular technique, has two variants-true tumescent liposuction (TTL) and semi-tumescent liposuction. While TTL reduces risks, it has limitations. There is no literature reported on semi-tumescent liposuction under deep sedation using the propofol-ketamine protocol, which is proposed as a potentially safe alternative.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis covered 8 years and included 3094 patients performed for tumescent liposuction under deep sedation, utilizing the propofol-ketamine protocol. The evaluation of patient safety involved an examination of potential adverse events with a specific focus on respiratory issues related to sedation, including instances of mask ventilation.

RESULTS

Among the 3094 cases, no fatalities were recorded. Noteworthy events included 43 mask ventilation instances, primarily occurring in the initial 10 min. Twelve cases experienced surgery cancellation due to various factors, including respiratory issues. Three patients were transferred to upper-level hospitals, while another three required blood transfusions. Vigilant management prevented significant complications, and other adverse events like venous thromboembolism (VTE), fat embolism, severe lidocaine toxicity, and so on were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of 3094 tumescent liposuction cases highlighted the overall safety profile of the propofol-ketamine protocol under deep sedation. The scarcity of severe complications underscores its viability. The study emphasizes the significance of thorough preoperative assessments, careful patient selection, and awareness of potential complications. Prompt interventions, particularly in addressing sedation-related respiratory issues, further contribute to positive outcomes for patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

在过去的 4 年中,美容手术,特别是吸脂术,大幅增加。肿胀吸脂术是一种流行的技术,有两种变体——真正的肿胀吸脂术(TTL)和半肿胀吸脂术。虽然 TTL 降低了风险,但它也有局限性。目前尚无文献报道在深镇静下使用丙泊酚-氯胺酮方案进行半肿胀吸脂术,该方案被提出作为一种潜在安全的替代方案。

方法

这项回顾性分析涵盖了 8 年时间,包括 3094 例在深镇静下接受肿胀吸脂术的患者,使用丙泊酚-氯胺酮方案。患者安全性评估包括检查潜在的不良事件,特别是与镇静相关的呼吸问题,包括面罩通气的情况。

结果

在 3094 例病例中,没有记录到死亡病例。值得注意的事件包括 43 例面罩通气情况,主要发生在最初的 10 分钟内。由于各种因素,包括呼吸问题,有 12 例手术取消。有 3 例患者被转至上级医院,另有 3 例需要输血。警惕性的管理防止了严重并发症的发生,也没有观察到其他不良事件,如静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)、脂肪栓塞、严重利多卡因毒性等。

结论

对 3094 例肿胀吸脂术的分析突出了深镇静下使用丙泊酚-氯胺酮方案的总体安全性。严重并发症的罕见性突出了其可行性。该研究强调了彻底的术前评估、仔细的患者选择以及对潜在并发症的认识的重要性。及时干预,特别是在解决镇静相关呼吸问题方面,进一步为患者带来积极的结果。

证据水平 IV:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验