Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland; Orthopaedic Department, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2159-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.018. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
Computer simulation has indicated a significant effect of scapulothoracic orientation and posture on range of motion (ROM) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We analyzed this putative effect on the clinical and radiologic outcome post-RTSA.
We retrospectively assessed 2-year follow-up data of RTSA patients treated at our clinic between 2008 and 2019. Patients were categorized into posture types A, B, and C based on an established method using scapular internal rotation on preoperative cross-sectional imaging. We compared differences in clinical ROM, pain, Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant Score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level utility index), and radiologic outcomes between posture types using linear regression analyses.
Of 681 included patients, 225 had type A posture, 326 type B, and 130 type C. Baseline group characteristics were comparable, although the type C group had a higher proportion of females (60% [A], 64% [B], 80% [C]) with lower abduction strength (0.7 kg [A], 0.6 kg [B], 0.3 kg [C]) and a slightly higher proportion with a Grammont design RTSA (41% [A], 48% [B], 54% [C]). There were significant adjusted differences in mean (±standard deviation) active flexion (A: 137° ± 21°; B: 136° ± 20°; C: 131° ± 19°) and passive flexion (A: 140° ± 19°; B: 138° ± 19°; C: 134° ± 18°), active (A: 127° ± 26°; B: 125° ± 26°; C: 117° ± 27°) and passive abduction (A: 129° ± 24°; B: 128° ± 25°; C: 121° ± 25°), SPADI (A: 81 ± 18; B: 79 ± 20; C: 73 ± 23), and pain (A: 1.2 ± 1.7; B: 1.6 ± 2.2; C: 1.8 ± 2.4) between posture types at 2 years (P ≤ .035). A higher distalization shoulder angle was associated with better abduction in type C patients (P = .016). Type C patients showed a trend toward a higher complication rate (3.9% vs. 1.1% [A], 3.2% [B]) (P = .067).
Type C posture influences the 2-year clinical outcome of RTSA patients in terms of worse flexion, abduction, SPADI, and pain. Scapulothoracic orientation and posture should be considered during the patient selection process, preoperative planning, and implantation of an RTSA.
计算机模拟表明,反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)后肩胛骨与胸廓的位置和姿势对活动范围(ROM)有显著影响。我们分析了这种假定的对 RTSA 术后临床和影像学结果的影响。
我们回顾性评估了 2008 年至 2019 年在我们诊所接受 RTSA 治疗的患者的 2 年随访数据。根据术前横断面影像学中肩胛骨内旋的既定方法,患者被分为姿势类型 A、B 和 C。我们使用线性回归分析比较了不同姿势类型之间的临床 ROM、疼痛、主观肩部价值、Constant 评分、肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)、生活质量(EuroQol-5 维度-5 级效用指数)和影像学结果的差异。
在纳入的 681 例患者中,225 例为 A 型姿势,326 例为 B 型,130 例为 C 型。基线组特征具有可比性,尽管 C 组女性比例较高(60%[A]、64%[B]、80%[C]),外展力量较低(0.7 kg[A]、0.6 kg[B]、0.3 kg[C]),并且使用 Grammont 设计的 RTSA 稍高(41%[A]、48%[B]、54%[C])。在平均(±标准差)主动屈曲(A:137°±21°;B:136°±20°;C:131°±19°)和被动屈曲(A:140°±19°;B:138°±19°;C:134°±18°)、主动(A:127°±26°;B:125°±26°;C:117°±27°)和被动外展(A:129°±24°;B:128°±25°;C:121°±25°)、SPADI(A:81±18;B:79±20;C:73±23)和疼痛(A:1.2±1.7;B:1.6±2.2;C:1.8±2.4)方面,2 年时姿势类型之间存在显著差异(P≤.035)。C 型患者的远端肩角较高与外展较好相关(P=0.016)。C 型患者的并发症发生率呈升高趋势(3.9%比 1.1%[A]、3.2%[B])(P=0.067)。
C 型姿势会影响 RTSA 患者 2 年的临床结果,表现为屈曲、外展、SPADI 和疼痛较差。在选择患者、术前计划和植入 RTSA 时,应考虑肩胛骨与胸廓的位置和姿势。